Literature DB >> 8229682

Targeting the systemic exposure of teniposide in the population and the individual using a stochastic therapeutic objective.

D Z D'Argenio1, J H Rodman.   

Abstract

A stochastic control approach for dose regimen design is developed and applied to the problem of targeting the systemic exposure, defined as the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC), of the anticancer drug teniposide in both the population and individual patients. The control objective involves maximizing the probability that AUC is within a selected target interval given either the population distribution for the kinetic model parameters (a priori control) or the posterior distribution for an individual patient (feedback control). Results of a detailed simulation study are presented, illustrating the feasibility of applying stochastic control principles to the design of dose regimens. The predictive ability of the calculated distributions of AUC for the population and for individuals is evaluated in part by determining the percentage coverage of the computed 95% uncertainty intervals using the simulation results. For the a priori control phase, 94% of the simulated subjects had values of systemic exposure within the computed 95% uncertainty interval, while 93.4% of the simulated subjects had feedback control phase systemic exposure values within their computed 95% uncertainty intervals. Similar evaluation of the uncertainty intervals calculated for plasma concentrations further document the ability of the proposed stochastic control method to predict the uncertainty associated with future therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229682     DOI: 10.1007/bf01059772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  11 in total

1.  Improved computer-assisted digoxin therapy. A method using feedback of measured serum digoxin concentrations.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; H Halkin; C Peck; B Rosenberg; K L Melmon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Incorporating prior parameter uncertainty in the design of sampling schedules for pharmacokinetic parameter estimation experiments.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 3.  Feedback control methods for drug dosage optimisation. Concepts, classification and clinical application.

Authors:  S Vozeh; J L Steimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  A priori lithium dosage regimen using population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  J Gaillot; J L Steimer; A J Mallet; J J Thebault; A Bieder
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1979-12

5.  Methods for evaluating optimal dosage regimens and their application to theophylline.

Authors:  O Richter; D Reinhardt
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1982-12

6.  VM-26 with prednisone and vincristine for treatment of refractory acute lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  G Rivera; W P Bowman; S B Murphy; G V Dahl; R J Aur; D K Kalwinsky; A Wood; S Stagner; T L Avery
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1982

7.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion teniposide: systemic exposure as a determinant of response in a phase I trial.

Authors:  J H Rodman; M Abromowitch; J A Sinkule; F A Hayes; G K Rivera; W E Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The clinical pharmacology of etoposide and teniposide.

Authors:  P I Clark; M L Slevin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Escalating teniposide systemic exposure to increase dose intensity for pediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  J H Rodman; W L Furman; M Sunderland; G Rivera; W E Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion amsacrine and teniposide for the treatment of relapsed childhood acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  W P Petros; J H Rodman; J Mirro; W E Evans
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  5 in total

1.  Use of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to design an optimal dose input profile.

Authors:  K Park; D Verotta; S K Gupta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-08

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  A Nonparametric Method to Optimize Initial Drug Dosing and Attainment of a Target Exposure Interval: Concepts and Application to Busulfan in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Michaël Philippe; Michael Neely; Yves Bertrand; Nathalie Bleyzac; Sylvain Goutelle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Amikacin Initial Dose in Critically Ill Patients: a Nonparametric Approach To Optimize A Priori Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainments in Individual Patients.

Authors:  Clément Boidin; Laurent Bourguignon; Sabine Cohen; Claire Roger; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Jason A Roberts; Bernard Allaouchiche; Alain Lepape; Arnaud Friggeri; Sylvain Goutelle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of some control strategies for three-compartment PK/PD models.

Authors:  C Hu; W S Lovejoy; S L Shafer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.