Literature DB >> 32958957

Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells.

Hui Kwon Kim1,2,3,4, Goosang Yu1,2, Jinman Park1,2, Seonwoo Min5, Sungtae Lee1, Sungroh Yoon5,6,7, Hyongbum Henry Kim8,9,10,11,12,13.   

Abstract

Prime editing enables the introduction of virtually any small-sized genetic change without requiring donor DNA or double-strand breaks. However, evaluation of prime editing efficiency requires time-consuming experiments, and the factors that affect efficiency have not been extensively investigated. In this study, we performed high-throughput evaluation of prime editor 2 (PE2) activities in human cells using 54,836 pairs of prime editing guide RNAs (pegRNAs) and their target sequences. The resulting data sets allowed us to identify factors affecting PE2 efficiency and to develop three computational models to predict pegRNA efficiency. For a given target sequence, the computational models predict efficiencies of pegRNAs with different lengths of primer binding sites and reverse transcriptase templates for edits of various types and positions. Testing the accuracy of the predictions using test data sets that were not used for training, we found Spearman's correlations between 0.47 and 0.81. Our computational models and information about factors affecting PE2 efficiency will facilitate practical application of prime editing.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32958957     DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0677-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  42 in total

1.  Precise genome engineering in Drosophila using prime editing.

Authors:  Justin A Bosch; Gabriel Birchak; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Plant synthetic epigenomic engineering for crop improvement.

Authors:  Liwen Yang; Pingxian Zhang; Yifan Wang; Guihua Hu; Weijun Guo; Xiaofeng Gu; Li Pu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 10.372

Review 4.  Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jordan L Doman; Alexander A Sousa; Peyton B Randolph; Peter J Chen; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 5.  Recent advances in CRISPR technologies for genome editing.

Authors:  Myeonghoon Song; Taeyoung Koo
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.946

Review 6.  On the Corner of Models and Cure: Gene Editing in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Marjolein Ensinck; Angélique Mottais; Claire Detry; Teresinha Leal; Marianne S Carlon
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Engineered prime editors with PAM flexibility.

Authors:  Jiyeon Kweon; Jung-Ki Yoon; An-Hee Jang; Ha Rim Shin; Ji-Eun See; Gayoung Jang; Jong-Il Kim; Yongsub Kim
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 12.910

Review 8.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing.

Authors:  Shengyao Zhi; Yuxi Chen; Guanglan Wu; Jinkun Wen; Jinni Wu; Qianyi Liu; Yang Li; Rui Kang; Sihui Hu; Jiahui Wang; Puping Liang; Junjiu Huang
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 10.  Advances in application of genome editing in tomato and recent development of genome editing technology.

Authors:  Xuehan Xia; Xinhua Cheng; Rui Li; Juanni Yao; Zhengguo Li; Yulin Cheng
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.574

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.