Literature DB >> 32940144

Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Anja Conev1, Eleni E Litsa1, Marissa R Perez2,3, Mani Diba2,3, Antonios G Mikos2,3, Lydia E Kavraki1.   

Abstract

Various material compositions have been successfully used in 3D printing with promising applications as scaffolds in tissue engineering. However, identifying suitable printing conditions for new materials requires extensive experimentation in a time and resource-demanding process. This study investigates the use of Machine Learning (ML) for distinguishing between printing configurations that are likely to result in low-quality prints and printing configurations that are more promising as a first step toward the development of a recommendation system for identifying suitable printing conditions. The ML-based framework takes as input the printing conditions regarding the material composition and the printing parameters and predicts the quality of the resulting print as either "low" or "high." We investigate two ML-based approaches: a direct classification-based approach that trains a classifier to distinguish between low- and high-quality prints and an indirect approach that uses a regression ML model that approximates the values of a printing quality metric. Both modes are built upon Random Forests. We trained and evaluated the models on a dataset that was generated in a previous study, which investigated fabrication of porous polymer scaffolds by means of extrusion-based 3D printing with a full-factorial design. Our results show that both models were able to correctly label the majority of the tested configurations while a simpler linear ML model was not effective. Additionally, our analysis showed that a full factorial design for data collection can lead to redundancies in the data, in the context of ML, and we propose a more efficient data collection strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; biomaterials; machine learning; printing quality prediction; random forests; tissue engineering

Year:  2020        PMID: 32940144      PMCID: PMC7759288          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  9 in total

1.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Evaluation of hydrogels for bio-printing applications.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Aleksander Skardal; Anthony Atala
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability.

Authors:  Jooyoung Lee; Seung Ja Oh; Sang Hyun An; Wan-Doo Kim; Sang-Heon Kim
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 9.954

4.  Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.

Authors:  Naomi Paxton; Willi Smolan; Thomas Böck; Ferry Melchels; Jürgen Groll; Tomasz Jungst
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  Printability study of hydrogel solution extrusion in nanoclay yield-stress bath during printing-then-gelation biofabrication.

Authors:  Yifei Jin; Wenxuan Chai; Yong Huang
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Correlating rheological properties and printability of collagen bioinks: the effects of riboflavin photocrosslinking and pH.

Authors:  Nicole Diamantides; Louis Wang; Tylar Pruiksma; Joseph Siemiatkoski; Caroline Dugopolski; Sonya Shortkroff; Stephen Kennedy; Lawrence J Bonassar
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.954

7.  Three-dimensional Printing of Multilayered Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Jason L Guo; Anthony Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 8.  'Printability' of Candidate Biomaterials for Extrusion Based 3D Printing: State-of-the-Art.

Authors:  Stuart Kyle; Zita M Jessop; Ayesha Al-Sabah; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  Yong He; FeiFei Yang; HaiMing Zhao; Qing Gao; Bing Xia; JianZhong Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting.

Authors:  Hossein Ravanbakhsh; Vahid Karamzadeh; Guangyu Bao; Luc Mongeau; David Juncker; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 32.086

Review 2.  Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views.

Authors:  Ali Malekpour; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

3.  Three-Dimensional Printing Self-Healing Dynamic/Photocrosslinking Gelatin-Hyaluronic Acid Double-Network Hydrogel for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yunping Wang; Yazhen Chen; Jianuo Zheng; Lingrong Liu; Qiqing Zhang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-03-29

4.  Machine Learning Reveals a General Understanding of Printability in Formulations Based on Rheology Additives.

Authors:  Ali Nadernezhad; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 17.521

5.  Influence of the parameters of the convolutional neural network model in predicting the effective compressive modulus of porous structure.

Authors:  Yongtao Lu; Yi Huo; Zhuoyue Yang; Yibiao Niu; Ming Zhao; Sergei Bosiakov; Lei Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-15

Review 6.  Advances in 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Angelika Zaszczyńska; Maryla Moczulska-Heljak; Arkadiusz Gradys; Paweł Sajkiewicz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems.

Authors:  Shuyu Tian; Rory Stevens; Bridget T McInnes; Nastassja A Lewinski
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  Optimized 3D Bioprinting Technology Based on Machine Learning: A Review of Recent Trends and Advances.

Authors:  Jaemyung Shin; Yoonjung Lee; Zhangkang Li; Jinguang Hu; Simon S Park; Keekyoung Kim
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.