Literature DB >> 29923501

Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Teng Gao1, Gregory J Gillispie, Joshua S Copus, Anil Kumar Pr, Young-Joon Seol, Anthony Atala, James J Yoo, Sang Jin Lee.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional bioprinting has emerged as a promising technique in tissue engineering applications through the precise deposition of cells and biomaterials in a layer-by-layer fashion. However, the limited availability of hydrogel bioinks is frequently cited as a major issue for the advancement of cell-based extrusion bioprinting technologies. It is well known that highly viscous materials maintain their structure better, but also have decreased cell viability due to the higher forces which are required for extrusion. However, little is known about the effect of the two distinct components of dynamic modulus of viscoelastic materials, storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G″), on the printability of hydrogel-based bioinks. Additionally, 'printability' has been poorly defined in the literature, mostly consisting of gross qualitative measures which do not allow for direct comparison of bioinks. This study developed a framework for evaluating printability and investigated the effect of dynamic modulus, including storage modulus (G'), loss modulus (G″), and loss tangent (G″/G') on the printing outcome. Gelatin and alginate as model hydrogels were mixed at various concentrations to obtain hydrogel formulations with a wide range of storage and loss moduli. These formulations were then evaluated for the quantitatively defined values of extrudability, extrusion uniformity, and structural integrity. For extrudability, increasing either the loss or storage modulus increased the pressure required to extrude the bioink. A mathematical model relating the G' and G″ to the required extrusion pressure was derived based on the data. A lower loss tangent was correlated with increased structural integrity while a higher loss tangent correlated with increased extrusion uniformity. Gelatin-alginate composite hydrogels with a loss tangent in the range of 0.25-0.45 exhibited an excellent compromise between structural integrity and extrusion uniformity. In addition to the characterization of a common bioink, the methodology introduced in this paper could also be used to evaluate the printability of other bioinks in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29923501      PMCID: PMC6040670          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  24 in total

1.  The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Yang Li; Shuangshuang Mao; Wei Sun; Rui Yao
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 2.  Advancing the field of 3D biomaterial printing.

Authors:  Adam E Jakus; Alexandra L Rutz; Ramille N Shah
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 3.  Rheological properties of the tissues of the central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  Shaokoon Cheng; Elizabeth C Clarke; Lynne E Bilston
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 4.  25th anniversary article: Engineering hydrogels for biofabrication.

Authors:  Jos Malda; Jetze Visser; Ferry P Melchels; Tomasz Jüngst; Wim E Hennink; Wouter J A Dhert; Jürgen Groll; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 5.  Advanced Bioinks for 3D Printing: A Materials Science Perspective.

Authors:  David Chimene; Kimberly K Lennox; Roland R Kaunas; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  State-of-the-Art Review of 3D Bioprinting for Cardiovascular Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Bin Duan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: An in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment.

Authors:  Kaile Zhang; Qiang Fu; James Yoo; Xiangxian Chen; Prafulla Chandra; Xiumei Mo; Lujie Song; Anthony Atala; Weixin Zhao
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds.

Authors:  L A Hockaday; K H Kang; N W Colangelo; P Y C Cheung; B Duan; E Malone; J Wu; L N Girardi; L J Bonassar; H Lipson; C C Chu; J T Butcher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  3D bioprinted functional and contractile cardiac tissue constructs.

Authors:  Zhan Wang; Sang Jin Lee; Heng-Jie Cheng; James J Yoo; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  A hydrogel bioink toolkit for mimicking native tissue biochemical and mechanical properties in bioprinted tissue constructs.

Authors:  Aleksander Skardal; Mahesh Devarasetty; Hyun-Wook Kang; Ivy Mead; Colin Bishop; Thomas Shupe; Sang Jin Lee; John Jackson; James Yoo; Shay Soker; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  48 in total

1.  The effect of BMP-mimetic peptide tethering bioinks on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 3D bioprinted dental constructs.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Weibo Zhang; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Pamela C Yelick; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Anja Conev; Eleni E Litsa; Marissa R Perez; Mani Diba; Antonios G Mikos; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Biomaterials for Bioprinting Microvasculature.

Authors:  Ryan W Barrs; Jia Jia; Sophia E Silver; Michael Yost; Ying Mei
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

5.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  3D bioprinting of vascular conduits for pediatric congenital heart repairs.

Authors:  Wenhan Lee; Yi Hong; Guohao Dai
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 7.  Electrobiofabrication: electrically based fabrication with biologically derived materials.

Authors:  Jinyang Li; Si Wu; Eunkyoung Kim; Kun Yan; Huan Liu; Changsheng Liu; Hua Dong; Xue Qu; Xiaowen Shi; Jana Shen; William E Bentley; Gregory F Payne
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 9.954

8.  The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Gillispie; Albert Han; Meryem Uzun-Per; John Fisher; Antonios G Mikos; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  A Comparative Study in the Printability of a Bioink and 3D Models Across Two Bioprinting Platforms.

Authors:  Matthew Alonzo; Erick Dominguez; Fabian Alvarez-Primo; Amado Quinonez; Erik Munoz; Jazmin Puebla; Antonio Barron; Luis Aguirre; Ana Vargas; Jean M Ramirez; Binata Joddar
Journal:  Mater Lett       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.423

Review 10.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.