Literature DB >> 28866170

Printability study of hydrogel solution extrusion in nanoclay yield-stress bath during printing-then-gelation biofabrication.

Yifei Jin1, Wenxuan Chai1, Yong Huang2.   

Abstract

Yield-stress support bath-enabled extrusion printing is emerging as a promising filament-based direct-write strategy for different applications in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Central to the printing quality of complex three-dimensional structures fabricated by the support bath-enabled fabrication approach is the formation of a continuous filament with well-defined geometry. The objective of this research is to study the printability of hydrogel precursor solutions in a Laponite nanoclay yield-stress bath during extrusion printing where the printed hydrogel precursor solutions remain liquid. The printability herein is mainly evaluated based on the morphology and dimensions of printed liquid filaments. Seven filament types are observed during extrusion in the nanoclay bath: three types of well-defined filaments (swelling, equivalent diameter, and stretched) and four types of irregular filaments (rough surface, over-deposited, compressed, and discontinuous). When the alginate concentration increases, the diameter of filaments made of alginate-gelatin blends decreases. The nanoclay concentration significantly affects the morphology of deposited filaments: low concentration Laponite bath (such as 0.5% (w/v)) may lead to the formation of irregular filaments such as rough surface and over-deposited filaments while high concentration bath (such as 8.0% (w/v)) may result in the formation of compressed filaments. Operating conditions affect the filament diameter and morphology similar to those as observed during conventional extrusion printing. The printability knowledge enables the successful fabrication of cellular vascular constructs in the Laponite nanoclay bath.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Filament formation; Material extrusion; Nanoclay support bath; Printability; Printing-then-gelation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28866170     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  15 in total

Review 1.  2D Nanoclay for Biomedical Applications: Regenerative Medicine, Therapeutic Delivery, and Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Lauren M Cross; Charles W Peak; Karli Gold; James K Carrow; Anna Brokesh; Kanwar Abhay Singh
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Anja Conev; Eleni E Litsa; Marissa R Perez; Mani Diba; Antonios G Mikos; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  Freeform 3D printing of soft matters: recent advances in technology for biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Shengyang Chen; Wen See Tan; Muhammad Aidil Bin Juhari; Qian Shi; Xue Shirley Cheng; Wai Lee Chan; Juha Song
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2020-09-29

4.  Extrusion and Microfluidic-based Bioprinting to Fabricate Biomimetic Tissues and Organs.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Einollah Sarikhani; Hossein Montazerian; Samad Ahadian; Marco Costantini; Wojciech Swieszkowski; Stephanie Willerth; Konrad Walus; Mohammad Mofidfar; Ehsan Toyserkani; Ali Khademhosseini; Nureddin Ashammakhi
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2020-05-26

5.  Study of sacrificial ink-assisted embedded printing for 3D perfusable channel creation for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bing Ren; Kaidong Song; Anil Reddy Sanikommu; Yejun Chai; Matthew A Longmire; Wenxuan Chai; Walter Lee Murfee; Yong Huang
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 19.162

Review 6.  From Shape to Function: The Next Step in Bioprinting.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; Tomasz Jungst; Ruben G Scheuring; Torsten Blunk; Juergen Groll; Jos Malda
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 7.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Printing bone in a gel: using nanocomposite bioink to print functionalised bone scaffolds.

Authors:  G Cidonio; M Cooke; M Glinka; J I Dawson; L Grover; R O C Oreffo
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-09

9.  An intestinal model with a finger-like villus structure fabricated using a bioprinting process and collagen/SIS-based cell-laden bioink.

Authors:  WonJin Kim; Geun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Transparent support media for high resolution 3D printing of volumetric cell-containing ECM structures.

Authors:  Assaf Shapira; Nadav Noor; Hadas Oved; Tal Dvir
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.