Literature DB >> 28930091

Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.

Naomi Paxton1, Willi Smolan, Thomas Böck, Ferry Melchels, Jürgen Groll, Tomasz Jungst.   

Abstract

The development and formulation of printable inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting has been a major challenge in the field of biofabrication. Inks, often polymer solutions with the addition of crosslinking to form hydrogels, must not only display adequate mechanical properties for the chosen application but also show high biocompatibility as well as printability. Here we describe a reproducible two-step method for the assessment of the printability of inks for bioprinting, focussing firstly on screening ink formulations to assess fibre formation and the ability to form 3D constructs before presenting a method for the rheological evaluation of inks to characterise the yield point, shear thinning and recovery behaviour. In conjunction, a mathematical model was formulated to provide a theoretical understanding of the pressure-driven, shear thinning extrusion of inks through needles in a bioprinter. The assessment methods were trialled with a commercially available crème, poloxamer 407, alginate-based inks and an alginate-gelatine composite material. Yield stress was investigated by applying a stress ramp to a number of inks, which demonstrated the necessity of high yield for printable materials. The shear thinning behaviour of the inks was then characterised by quantifying the degree of shear thinning and using the mathematical model to predict the window of printer operating parameters in which the materials could be printed. Furthermore, the model predicted high shear conditions and high residence times for cells at the walls of the needle and effects on cytocompatibility at different printing conditions. Finally, the ability of the materials to recover to their original viscosity after extrusion was examined using rotational recovery rheological measurements. Taken together, these assessment techniques revealed significant insights into the requirements for printable inks and shear conditions present during the extrusion process and allow the rapid and reproducible characterisation of a wide variety of inks for bioprinting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28930091     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8dd8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  75 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular tissue bioprinting: Physical and chemical processes.

Authors:  James B Hu; Martin L Tomov; Jan W Buikema; Caressa Chen; Morteza Mahmoudi; Sean M Wu; Vahid Serpooshan
Journal:  Appl Phys Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.162

2.  3D printed coaxial nozzles for the extrusion of hydrogel tubes toward modeling vascular endothelium.

Authors:  S Cem Millik; Ashley M Dostie; Dylan G Karis; Patrick T Smith; Michael McKenna; Nathan Chan; Chad D Curtis; Elizabeth Nance; Ashleigh B Theberge; Alshakim Nelson
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 3.  Three-dimensional bioprinting of stem-cell derived tissues for human regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Gregor Skeldon; Baltasar Lucendo-Villarin; Wenmiao Shu
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Teng Gao; Gregory J Gillispie; Joshua S Copus; Anil Kumar Pr; Young-Joon Seol; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 9.954

5.  From arteries to capillaries: approaches to engineering human vasculature.

Authors:  Sharon Fleischer; Daniel Naveed Tavakol; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 18.808

6.  3D Bioprinted Highly Elastic Hybrid Constructs for Advanced Fibrocartilaginous Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  João B Costa; Jihoon Park; Adam M Jorgensen; Joana Silva-Correia; Rui L Reis; Joaquim M Oliveira; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 9.811

7.  Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Anja Conev; Eleni E Litsa; Marissa R Perez; Mani Diba; Antonios G Mikos; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

9.  Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.

Authors:  Kaivalya A Deo; Kanwar Abhay Singh; Charles W Peak; Daniel L Alge; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  3D bioprinting of vascular conduits for pediatric congenital heart repairs.

Authors:  Wenhan Lee; Yi Hong; Guohao Dai
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 7.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.