Literature DB >> 34209404

Machine Assisted Experimentation of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Systems.

Shuyu Tian1, Rory Stevens1, Bridget T McInnes2, Nastassja A Lewinski1.   

Abstract

Optimization of extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB) parameters have been systematically conducted through experimentation. However, the process is time- and resource-intensive and not easily translatable to other laboratories. This study approaches EBB parameter optimization through machine learning (ML) models trained using data collected from the published literature. We investigated regression-based and classification-based ML models and their abilities to predict printing outcomes of cell viability and filament diameter for cell-containing alginate and gelatin composite bioinks. In addition, we interrogated if regression-based models can predict suitable extrusion pressure given the desired cell viability when keeping other experimental parameters constant. We also compared models trained across data from general literature to models trained across data from one literature source that utilized alginate and gelatin bioinks. The results indicate that models trained on large amounts of data can impart physical trends on cell viability, filament diameter, and extrusion pressure seen in past literature. Regression models trained on the larger dataset also predict cell viability closer to experimental values for material concentration combinations not seen in training data of the single-paper-based regression models. While the best performing classification models for cell viability can achieve an average prediction accuracy of 70%, the cell viability predictions remained constant despite altering input parameter combinations. Our trained models on bioprinting literature data show the potential usage of applying ML models to bioprinting experimental design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bioprinting; 3D printing; alginate; artificial intelligence; classification; extrusion-based bioprinting; gelatin; machine learning; random forest; regression

Year:  2021        PMID: 34209404     DOI: 10.3390/mi12070780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-666X            Impact factor:   2.891


  20 in total

1.  Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes.

Authors:  Kalyani Nair; Milind Gandhi; Saif Khalil; Karen Chang Yan; Michele Marcolongo; Kenneth Barbee; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.677

2.  Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels.

Authors:  Yin Yu; Yahui Zhang; James A Martin; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Alginate dependent changes of physical properties in 3D bioprinted cell-laden porous scaffolds affect cell viability and cell morphology.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhang; Esther Wehrle; Jolanda R Vetsch; Graeme R Paul; Marina Rubert; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.715

4.  Automated Robotic Dispensing Technique for Surface Guidance and Bioprinting of Cells.

Authors:  Ramya Bhuthalingam; Pei Q Lim; Scott A Irvine; Subbu S Venkatraman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Machine learning-based design strategy for 3D printable bioink: elastic modulus and yield stress determine printability.

Authors:  Jooyoung Lee; Seung Ja Oh; Sang Hyun An; Wan-Doo Kim; Sang-Heon Kim
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 9.954

6.  Machine Learning-Guided Three-Dimensional Printing of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.

Authors:  Anja Conev; Eleni E Litsa; Marissa R Perez; Mani Diba; Antonios G Mikos; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.

Authors:  Naomi Paxton; Willi Smolan; Thomas Böck; Ferry Melchels; Jürgen Groll; Tomasz Jungst
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 9.954

8.  Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite Laponite-gelatin bioinks.

Authors:  Gianluca Cidonio; Cesar R Alcala-Orozco; Khoon S Lim; Michael Glinka; Isha Mutreja; Yang-Hee Kim; Jonathan I Dawson; Tim B F Woodfield; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  Porous bioprinted constructs in BMP-2 non-viral gene therapy for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Loek D Loozen; Fiona Wegman; F Cumhur Öner; Wouter J A Dhert; Jacqueline Alblas
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 6.331

10.  Occurrence of the potent mutagens 2- nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone in fine airborne particles.

Authors:  Aldenor G Santos; Gisele O da Rocha; Jailson B de Andrade
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Printability and Cell Viability in Extrusion-Based Bioprinting from Experimental, Computational, and Machine Learning Views.

Authors:  Ali Malekpour; Xiongbiao Chen
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2022-04-10

Review 2.  Vascularization in Bioartificial Parenchymal Tissue: Bioink and Bioprinting Strategies.

Authors:  Gabriel Alexander Salg; Andreas Blaeser; Jamina Sofie Gerhardus; Thilo Hackert; Hannes Goetz Kenngott
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.