| Literature DB >> 32928297 |
Ibrahim Juma1,2, Mulatu Geleta3, Agnes Nyomora4, Ganapathi Varma Saripella3, Helena Persson Hovmalm3, Anders S Carlsson3, Moneim Fatih3, Rodomiro Ortiz3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Avocado is an important cash crop in Tanzania, however its genetic diversity is not thoroughly investigated. This study was undertaken to explore the genetic diversity of avocado in the southern highlands using microsatellite markers. A total of 226 local avocado trees originating from seeds were sampled in eight districts of the Mbeya, Njombe and Songwe regions. Each district was considered as a population. The diversity at 10 microsatellite loci was investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Breeding; Genetic admixture; Germplasm management; Population structure; SSR markers
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32928297 PMCID: PMC7489003 DOI: 10.1186/s41065-020-00150-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hereditas ISSN: 0018-0661 Impact factor: 3.271
Diversity in avocado trees grown from seeds in eight districts in southern highlands of Tanzania
| Locus name | Repeats | Na | Ne | Ho | He | I | HW | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (AG)10 | 17 | 3.84 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 1.73 | *** | 0.70 | |
| (GA)15 | 23 | 9.59 | 0.71 | 0.90 | 2.59 | *** | 0.89 | |
| (AT)7,(AG)12 | 16 | 8.96 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 2.40 | *** | 0.88 | |
| (TC)20 | 14 | 8.32 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 2.31 | *** | 0.87 | |
| (AC)8(AG)14 | 20 | 6.81 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 2.30 | *** | 0.84 | |
| (AGAGGG)4(AG)3 | 19 | 7.94 | 0.46 | 0.87 | 2.33 | *** | 0.86 | |
| (AG)15 | 11 | 4.34 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 1.79 | * | 0.75 | |
| (CTT)8(CT)11 | 20 | 7.35 | 0.67 | 0.86 | 2.32 | NS | 0.85 | |
| (GA)21 | 17 | 7.02 | 0.82 | 0.86 | 2.20 | NS | 0.84 | |
| (GAA)5(GA)14 | 10 | 3.99 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 1.69 | * | 0.72 | |
| Mean | 16.70 | 6.81 | 0.65 | 0.84 | 2.17 | 0.82 | ||
| Standard error | 1.30 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.02 |
*, ** and *** indicate significance of p value at p < 0.05, ≤0.01 and ≤ 0.001, respectively whereas NS indicates the non-significance of the p value after Bonferroni correction. a = from [24] b = from [25]
Na: Observed number of alleles
Ne: Effective number of alleles [26]
Ho: Observed heterozygosity
He: Nei’s [27] expected heterozygosity
I: Shannon information index [28]
HW: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test
PIC: Polymorphism information content
Diversity information among the eight geographic populations (districts)
| District | Na | Ne | He | Ho | I | Gene diversity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbeya city | 9.60 ± 2.68 | 4.98 ± 0.34 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 1.83 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.10 |
| Mbeya rural | 10.70 ± 2.26 | 5.86 ± 0.68 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.67 ± 0.04 | 1.95 ± 0.10 | 0.65 ± 0.11 |
| Rungwe | 7.20 ± 0.63 | 4.10 ± 0.47 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.08 | 1.54 ± 0.12 | 0.54 ± 0.09 |
| Busokelo | 5.78 ± 0.61 | 3.46 ± 0.48 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 1.29 ± 0.17 | 0.59 ± 0.10 |
| Njombe urban | 4.20 ± 0.36 | 2.96 ± 0.29 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 1.19 ± 0.09 | 0.47 ± 0.09 |
| Njombe rural | 10.70 ± 0.70 | 5.90 ± 0.50 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | 1.96 ± 0.09 | 0.60 ± 0.32 |
| Wanging’ombe | 9.30 ± 0.97 | 5.67 ± 0.76 | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 1.86 ± 0.13 | 0.57 ± 0.10 |
| Mbozi | 9.30 ± 0.75 | 5.93 ± 0.57 | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.10 | 1.92 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.09 |
Analysis of molecular variance using 1000 permutations for 226 avocado trees from eight populations (districts)
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Variance component | Percentage variation | F-Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 115.33 | 0.258 Va | 6.08 | FST = 0.061 | < 0.0001 (Va and FST) |
| Among individuals within populations | 841.00 | 0.722Vb | 17.04 | FIS = 0.181 | < 0.0001 (Vb and FIS) |
| Within individuals | 620.00 | 3.258Vc | 76.87 | FIT = 0.231 | < 0.0001 (Vc and FIT) |
| Total | 1576.33 | 4.239 | |||
| Among groups (regions) | 43.605 | 0.085 Va | 1.98 | FCT = 0.019 | 0.02 (Va and FCT) |
| Among populations (districts) within groups | 71.721 | 0.201 Vb | 4.71 | FSC = 0.048 | < 0.0001 (Vb and FSC) |
| Among individuals within populations (districts) | 841.004 | 0.722 Vc | 16.93 | FIS = 0.181 | < 0.0001 (Vc and FIS) |
| Within individuals | 620.000 | 3.258 Vd | 76.38 | FIT = 0.236 | < 0.0001 (Vd and FIT) |
| Total | 1576.330 | 4.266 | |||
| Among altitudinal groups | 45.185 | 0.107Va | 2.52 | FST = 0.025 | < 0.0001 (Va and FST) |
| Among individuals within altitudinal groups | 911.144 | 0.865Vb | 20.45 | FIS = 0.210 | < 0.0001 (Vb and FIS) |
| Within individuals | 620.000 | 3.258Vc | 77.03 | FIT = 0.230 | < 0.0001 (Vc and FIT) |
| Total | 1576.330 | 4.230 | |||
1 altitudinal groups were regarded as populations and that is why FST was calculated
Population pairwise FST comparisons between eight avocado populations
| Population | Mbeya city | Mbeya rural | Rungwe | Busokelo | Njombe urban | Njombe rural | Wanging’ombe | Mbozi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbeya city | 0.0000 | |||||||
| Mbeya rural | 0.0111* | 0.0000 | ||||||
| Rungwe | 0.0653* | 0.0329* | 0.0000 | |||||
| Busokelo | 0.0522* | 0.0254* | 0.0076 | 0.0000 | ||||
| Njombe urban | 0.0768* | 0.0446* | −0.0057 | −0.0349 | 0.0000 | |||
| Njombe rural | 0.0323* | 0.0215* | 0.0354* | 0.0231* | 0.0265 | 0.0000 | ||
| Wanging’ombe | 0.0321* | 0.0249* | 0.0341* | 0.0062 | 0.0057 | 0.0060 | 0.0000 | |
| Mbozi | 0.0521* | 0.0583* | 0.1475* | 0.1290* | 0.1369* | 0.0477* | 0.0670* | 0.0000 |
* indicates significance level at P ≤ 0.05 for the tested values
Fig. 1PCA showing the genetic relationships among the 226 avocado trees
Fig. 2Dendrogram of the 226 avocado trees constructed with UPGMA showing genetic relationships between the analysed samples. Samples collected from a common district are represented by names in the same text colour; black = Mbeya city, yellow = Mbeya rural, red = Rungwe, grey = Busokelo, dark purple = Njombe urban, blue = Njombe rural, green = Wanging’ombe and shining purple = Mbozi
Fig. 3Population structure of the analysed trees. a: Identification of the optimum K-value using four different approaches developed by Puechmaille [29]; b: Population structure of 226 avocado trees suggesting varying levels of genetic admixture from four origins (colours) in the eight districts in the southern highlands of Tanzania
Fig. 4Location of sampling sites. (1) Top left: Tanzania map displaying location of the three avocado-rich regions; (2) Bottom left: regions showing locations of the eight sampled districts; (3) Top and bottom right: districts showing locations of villages/streets where sampling was carried out
Number of trees sampled in each district
| Region | District | Number of trees sampled |
|---|---|---|
| Mbeya | Mbeya city | 43 |
| Mbeya rural | 43 | |
| Rungwe | 34 | |
| Busokelo | 18 | |
| Njombe | Njombe urban | 7 |
| Njombe rural | 32 | |
| Wanging’ombe | 24 | |
| Songwe | Mbozi | 25 |
| Total number trees | 226 |
Climate data of the eight districts
| Region | District | Climate | Climate classification according to Köppen and Geiger | Average temperature for a year | Minimum monthly average temperature | Maximum monthly average temperature | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbeya | Mbeya city | Mild, and generally warm and temperate | Cwb | 17.7 °C | 14.6 °C (July) | 20.1 °C (November) | Climate-data.org (Undated- |
| Mbeya rural | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||
| Rungewe (Tukuyu) | Oceanic subtropical highland climate | Cwb | 20.5 °C | 17.2 °C (July) | 23.1 °C (November) | Weatherbase (Undated- | |
| Busokelo (Masoko) | Tropical monsoon climate | Am | 22.5 °C | 19.7 °C (July) | 24.9 °C (November) | Climate-data.org (Undated- | |
| Njombe | Njombe urban | Oceanic Subtropical Highland Climate | Cwb | 18.1 ° C | 14.9 ° C (July) | 20.6 °C (November) | Weatherbase (Undated- |
| Njombe rural | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | ||
| Wanging’ombe | Mild, and generally warm and temperate | Cwa | 20.2 °C | 17.7 °C (July) | 22.5 °C (December) | Climate-data.org (Undated- | |
| Songwe | Mbozi (Mlowo) | Warm and temperate | Cwb | 19.5 °C | 17.1 °C (July) | 21.5 °C (October) | Climate-data.org (Undated- |