| Literature DB >> 32921787 |
Chloe Mighton1,2, Salma Shickh1,2, Elizabeth Uleryk3, Petros Pechlivanoglou1,4, Yvonne Bombard5,6.
Abstract
This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on psychological and clinical outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis and meta-aggregation. The search identified 4539 unique studies and 15 were included in the review. Patients with VUS reported higher genetic test-specific concerns on the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) scale than patients with negative results (mean difference 3.73 [95% CI 0.80 to 6.66] P = 0.0126), and lower than patients with positive results (mean difference -7.01 [95% CI -11.31 to -2.71], P = 0.0014). Patients with VUS and patients with negative results were similarly likely to have a change in their clinical management (OR 1.41 [95% CI 0.90 to 2.21], P = 0.182), and less likely to have a change in management than patients with positive results (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.19], P < 0.0001). Factors that contributed to how patients responded to their VUS included their interpretation of the result and their health-care provider's counseling and recommendations. Review findings suggest there may be a need for practice guidelines or clinical decision support tools for VUS disclosure and management.Entities:
Keywords: clinical outcomes; genetic testing; psychologicaloutcomes; systematic review; variant of uncertain significance
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32921787 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Med ISSN: 1098-3600 Impact factor: 8.822