Literature DB >> 32921787

Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chloe Mighton1,2, Salma Shickh1,2, Elizabeth Uleryk3, Petros Pechlivanoglou1,4, Yvonne Bombard5,6.   

Abstract

This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the literature on psychological and clinical outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data. Data were synthesized through meta-analysis and meta-aggregation. The search identified 4539 unique studies and 15 were included in the review. Patients with VUS reported higher genetic test-specific concerns on the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) scale than patients with negative results (mean difference 3.73 [95% CI 0.80 to 6.66] P = 0.0126), and lower than patients with positive results (mean difference -7.01 [95% CI -11.31 to -2.71], P = 0.0014). Patients with VUS and patients with negative results were similarly likely to have a change in their clinical management (OR 1.41 [95% CI 0.90 to 2.21], P = 0.182), and less likely to have a change in management than patients with positive results (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.19], P < 0.0001). Factors that contributed to how patients responded to their VUS included their interpretation of the result and their health-care provider's counseling and recommendations. Review findings suggest there may be a need for practice guidelines or clinical decision support tools for VUS disclosure and management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical outcomes; genetic testing; psychologicaloutcomes; systematic review; variant of uncertain significance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32921787     DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-00957-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  41 in total

1.  The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life.

Authors:  Joël Vos; Wilma Otten; Christi van Asperen; Anna Jansen; Fred Menko; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Exome sequencing can improve diagnosis and alter patient management.

Authors:  Stacey B Gabriel; Joseph G Gleeson; Tracy J Dixon-Salazar; Jennifer L Silhavy; Nitin Udpa; Jana Schroth; Stephanie Bielas; Ashleigh E Schaffer; Jesus Olvera; Vineet Bafna; Maha S Zaki; Ghada H Abdel-Salam; Lobna A Mansour; Laila Selim; Sawsan Abdel-Hadi; Naima Marzouki; Tawfeg Ben-Omran; Nouriya A Al-Saana; F Müjgan Sonmez; Figen Celep; Matloob Azam; Kiley J Hill; Adrienne Collazo; Ali G Fenstermaker; Gaia Novarino; Naiara Akizu; Kiran V Garimella; Carrie Sougnez; Carsten Russ
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Selenocysteine beta-lyase: a novel pyridoxal enzyme.

Authors:  K Soda; N Esaki; T Nakamura; N Karai; P Chocat; H Tanaka
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1984

4.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Matthew B Yurgelun; Michael P Berry; Saundra S Buys; Patricia Dickson; Susan M Domchek; Ahmed Elkhanany; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Michael Goggins; Mollie L Hutton; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison W Kurian; Christine Laronga; Jennifer K Litton; Julie S Mak; Carolyn S Menendez; Sofia D Merajver; Barbara S Norquist; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Holly J Pederson; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Kala Visvanathan; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Myra J Wick; Kari B Wisinski; Mary A Dwyer; Susan D Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress.

Authors:  J O Culver; C D Brinkerhoff; J Clague; K Yang; K E Singh; S R Sand; J N Weitzel
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Variant classification changes over time in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; George S Charames; Marina Wang; Kathleen-Rose Zakoor; Andrew Wong; Salma Shickh; Nicholas Watkins; Matthew S Lebo; Yvonne Bombard; Jordan Lerner-Ellis
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic.

Authors:  Sarah Macklin; Nisha Durand; Paldeep Atwal; Stephanie Hines
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care.

Authors:  Yael Amano; Aviad Raz; Stefan Timmermans; Shiri Shkedi-Rafid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Erica M Bednar; Kate J Krause; Susan K Peterson; Maria A Lopez-Olivo
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 3.  Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Aideen M McInerney-Leo; Emma L Duncan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 4.  Molecular Basis, Diagnostic Challenges and Therapeutic Approaches of Bartter and Gitelman Syndromes: A Primer for Clinicians.

Authors:  Laura Nuñez-Gonzalez; Noa Carrera; Miguel A Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Detection of germline variants in Brazilian breast cancer patients using multigene panel testing.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Danilo Vilela Viana; João Paulo Fumio Whitaker Kitajima; Vinícius Marques Rocha; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Yonglan Zheng; Érika Freitas; Fabiola Paoli Mendes Monteiro; André Valim; David Schlesinger; Fernando Kok; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Co-designing models for the communication of genomic results for rare diseases: a comparative study in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Alessia Costa; Věra Franková; Glenn Robert; Milan Macek; Christine Patch; Elizabeth Alexander; Anna Arellanesova; Jill Clayton-Smith; Amy Hunter; Markéta Havlovicová; Radka Pourová; Marie Pritchard; Lauren Roberts; Veronika Zoubková; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-05-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.