Literature DB >> 33679611

Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.

Aideen M McInerney-Leo1, Emma L Duncan2.   

Abstract

There have been two major eras in the history of gene discovery. The first was the era of linkage analysis, with approximately 1,300 disease-related genes identified by positional cloning by the turn of the millennium. The second era has been powered by two major breakthroughs: the publication of the human genome and the development of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). MPS has greatly accelerated disease gene identification, such that disease genes that would have taken years to map previously can now be determined in a matter of weeks. Additionally, the number of affected families needed to map a causative gene and the size of such families have fallen: de novo mutations, previously intractable by linkage analysis, can be identified through sequencing of the parent-child trio, and genes for recessive disease can be identified through MPS even of a single affected individual. MPS technologies include whole exome sequencing (WES), whole genome sequencing (WGS), and panel sequencing, each with their strengths. While WES has been responsible for most gene discoveries through MPS, WGS is superior in detecting copy number variants, chromosomal rearrangements, and repeat-rich regions. Panels are commonly used for diagnostic purposes as they are extremely cost-effective and generate manageable quantities of data, with no risk of unexpected findings. However, in instances of diagnostic uncertainty, it can be challenging to choose the right panel, and in these circumstances WES has a higher diagnostic yield. MPS has ethical, social, and legal implications, many of which are common to genetic testing generally but amplified due to the magnitude of data (e.g., relationship misattribution, identification of variants of uncertain significance, and genetic discrimination); others are unique to WES and WGS technologies (e.g., incidental or secondary findings). Nonetheless, MPS is rapidly translating into clinical practice as an extremely useful part of the clinical armamentarium.
Copyright © 2021 McInerney-Leo and Duncan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gene discovery; massively parallel sequencing; rare genetic bone disorder; skeletal dysplasias; whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679611      PMCID: PMC7933540          DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.628946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)        ISSN: 1664-2392            Impact factor:   5.555


  99 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  SIFT missense predictions for genomes.

Authors:  Robert Vaser; Swarnaseetha Adusumalli; Sim Ngak Leng; Mile Sikic; Pauline C Ng
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  A polymorphic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington's disease.

Authors:  J F Gusella; N S Wexler; P M Conneally; S L Naylor; M A Anderson; R E Tanzi; P C Watkins; K Ottina; M R Wallace; A Y Sakaguchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Nov 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Next-generation sequencing: a frameshift in skeletal dysplasia gene discovery.

Authors:  S Lazarus; A Zankl; E L Duncan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteogenesis imperfecta type V: marked phenotypic variability despite the presence of the IFITM5 c.-14C>T mutation in all patients.

Authors:  Frank Rauch; Pierre Moffatt; Moira Cheung; Peter Roughley; Liljana Lalic; Allan M Lund; Norman Ramirez; Somayyeh Fahiminiya; Jacek Majewski; Francis H Glorieux
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Short-rib polydactyly and Jeune syndromes are caused by mutations in WDR60.

Authors:  Aideen M McInerney-Leo; Miriam Schmidts; Claudio R Cortés; Paul J Leo; Blanca Gener; Andrew D Courtney; Brooke Gardiner; Jessica A Harris; Yeping Lu; Mhairi Marshall; Peter J Scambler; Philip L Beales; Matthew A Brown; Andreas Zankl; Hannah M Mitchison; Emma L Duncan; Carol Wicking
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The use of ACMG secondary findings recommendations for general population screening: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Genetic testing, insurance discrimination and medical research: what the United States can learn from peer countries.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon; Effy Vayena; Robert C Green; I Glenn Cohen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  MBTPS2 mutations cause defective regulated intramembrane proteolysis in X-linked osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Uschi Lindert; Wayne A Cabral; Surasawadee Ausavarat; Siraprapa Tongkobpetch; Katja Ludin; Aileen M Barnes; Patra Yeetong; Maryann Weis; Birgit Krabichler; Chalurmpon Srichomthong; Elena N Makareeva; Andreas R Janecke; Sergey Leikin; Benno Röthlisberger; Marianne Rohrbach; Ingo Kennerknecht; David R Eyre; Kanya Suphapeetiporn; Cecilia Giunta; Joan C Marini; Vorasuk Shotelersuk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  New Developments and Possibilities in Reanalysis and Reinterpretation of Whole Exome Sequencing Datasets for Unsolved Rare Diseases Using Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Samarth Thonta Setty; Marie-Pier Scott-Boyer; Tania Cuppens; Arnaud Droit
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Pathophysiological Heterogeneity of the BBSOA Neurodevelopmental Syndrome.

Authors:  Michele Bertacchi; Chiara Tocco; Christian P Schaaf; Michèle Studer
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 7.666

3.  Lamin A/C missense variants: from discovery to functional validation.

Authors:  Julieta Lazarte; Robert A Hegele
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 8.617

4.  Comprehensive Molecular Analysis of DMD Gene Increases the Diagnostic Value of Dystrophinopathies: A Pilot Study in a Southern Italy Cohort of Patients.

Authors:  Fatima Domenica Elisa De Palma; Marcella Nunziato; Valeria D'Argenio; Maria Savarese; Gabriella Esposito; Francesco Salvatore
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 5.  A Roadmap to Gene Discoveries and Novel Therapies in Monogenic Low and High Bone Mass Disorders.

Authors:  Melissa M Formosa; Dylan J M Bergen; Celia L Gregson; Antonio Maurizi; Anders Kämpe; Natalia Garcia-Giralt; Wei Zhou; Daniel Grinberg; Diana Ovejero Crespo; M Carola Zillikens; Graham R Williams; J H Duncan Bassett; Maria Luisa Brandi; Luca Sangiorgi; Susanna Balcells; Wolfgang Högler; Wim Van Hul; Outi Mäkitie
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Comparison of multiple imputation algorithms and verification using whole-genome sequencing in the CMUH genetic biobank.

Authors:  Ting-Yuan Liu; Chih-Fan Lin; Hsing-Tsung Wu; Ya-Lun Wu; Yu-Chia Chen; Chi-Chou Liao; Yu-Pao Chou; Dysan Chao; Ya-Sian Chang; Hsing-Fang Lu; Jan-Gowth Chang; Kai-Cheng Hsu; Fuu-Jen Tsai
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 7.  Hypoglycaemia Metabolic Gene Panel Testing.

Authors:  Arianna Maiorana; Francesca Romana Lepri; Antonio Novelli; Carlo Dionisi-Vici
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 8.  Curative Cell and Gene Therapy for Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Authors:  Aaron Schindeler; Lucinda R Lee; Alexandra K O'Donohue; Samantha L Ginn; Craig F Munns
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 6.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.