Literature DB >> 33843052

Clinical management among individuals with variant of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sukh Makhnoon1, Erica M Bednar2, Kate J Krause3, Susan K Peterson1, Maria A Lopez-Olivo4.   

Abstract

Improper medical use of variant of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a concern in hereditary cancer genetic testing. The goal of this study was to assess the association between pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP), VUS, and benign and likely benign (B/LB) genetic test results and cancer-related surgical and screening management. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO were conducted from 1946 to August 26, 2020. Eligible studies included individuals with cancer genetic test result and surgical or screening management outcomes. We reviewed 885 abstracts and 22 studies that reported relevant surgical and screening outcomes were included. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher surgical rates among individuals with P/LP than among those with VUS for therapeutic mastectomy with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 7.35, 95% CI, 4.14-13.64), prophylactic mastectomy (OR = 3.05, 95% CI, 1.5-6.19), and oophorectomy (OR = 6.46, 95% CI, 3.64-11.44). There were no significant differences in therapeutic mastectomy, or breast conservation or lumpectomy rates between individuals with P/LP and VUS, or in any outcomes between patients with VUS and B/LB. Studies evaluating screening outcomes were limited, and results were conflicting. Comprehensive analysis do not indicate that a significant number of individuals with VUS results undergo inappropriate clinical management.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S . Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benign variant; cancer; genetic test result; meta-analysis; pathogenic variant; screening; surgery; systematic review; variant of uncertain significance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33843052      PMCID: PMC8672382          DOI: 10.1111/cge.13966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  37 in total

1.  Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer susceptibility in a rural Familial Cancer Program.

Authors:  David J Hermel; Wendy C McKinnon; Marie E Wood; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Prospective Study of Surgical Decision-making Processes for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Melissa A Crosby; Yu Shen; Dalliah M Black; Gildy Babiera; Henry M Kuerer; Jun Ying; Wenli Dong; Scott B Cantor; Abenaa M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Patients' Medical and Psychosocial Experiences After Detection of a CDH1 Variant With Multigene Panel Testing.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Jessica M Long; Amanda C Brandt; Jamie Brower; Heather Symecko; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Stephanie N Christian; Tricia Harstad; Fergus J Couch; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-03-28

4.  Comparison of risk management strategies between women testing positive for a BRCA variant of unknown significance and women with known BRCA deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Christine Garcia; Liisa Lyon; Ramey D Littell; C Bethan Powell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Yun Li; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; M Chandler McLeod; Reshma Jagsi; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 50.717

6.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate and predictive factors among patients with breast cancer who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Nisreen Elsayegh; Rachel D Webster; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Heather Lin; Henry M Kuerer; Jennifer K Litton; Isabelle Bedrosian; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making.

Authors:  Jing Yi Chern; Sarah S Lee; Melissa K Frey; Jessica Lee; Stephanie V Blank
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Salma Shickh; Elizabeth Uleryk; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.