Literature DB >> 29215655

Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic.

Sarah Macklin1, Nisha Durand2, Paldeep Atwal1,3, Stephanie Hines4.   

Abstract

PurposeEfforts have been made by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology to make variant classification more uniform, but many limitations remain. Reclassification of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) is expected, but other more certain calls, like pathogenic or benign, can also be reclassified once additional information is gathered. Variant reclassification can create difficult circumstances for both patients and clinicians.MethodsRetrospective review of all variant reclassifications in genes associated with hereditary cancer syndromes at one clinic between September 2013 and February 2017 was completed. All variant reclassifications were completed and reported by the original testing laboratory.ResultsA total of 1,103 hereditary cancer tests were ordered. Fewer than 5% (40/1,103) of the initial reports were updated during that time period. Most reclassifications (29/40) were downgrades of VUS to likely benign. Only three reclassifications could potentially alter medical management.ConclusionThe majority of variant reclassifications do not impact medical management. Upgrading a variant call to pathogenic could be important for a patient's care and shows the importance of open communication between laboratories and clinicians. A variant downgrade from pathogenic can be a significant reclassification as well, especially if prophylactic surgery has been completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29215655     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  17 in total

1.  The counsellees' view of an unclassified variant in BRCA1/2: recall, interpretation, and impact on life.

Authors:  Joël Vos; Wilma Otten; Christi van Asperen; Anna Jansen; Fred Menko; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  The current state of clinical interpretation of sequence variants.

Authors:  Derick C Hoskinson; Adrian M Dubuc; Heather Mason-Suares
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  William Gradishar; KariAnne Johnson; Krystal Brown; Erin Mundt; Susan Manley
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Frequency of Germline Mutations in 25 Cancer Susceptibility Genes in a Sequential Series of Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Nancy U Lin; John Kidd; Brian A Allen; Nanda Singh; Richard J Wenstrup; Anne-Renee Hartman; Eric P Winer; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Efficacy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations.

Authors:  Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Grazia Artioli
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions.

Authors:  Mitzi L Murray; Felecia Cerrato; Robin L Bennett; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Public variant databases: liability?

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Robert Cook-Deegan; Bartha Maria Knoppers
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Risks of Breast, Ovarian, and Contralateral Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Karoline B Kuchenbaecker; John L Hopper; Daniel R Barnes; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Thea M Mooij; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Sarah Jervis; Flora E van Leeuwen; Roger L Milne; Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Matti A Rookus; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Lesley McGuffog; D Gareth Evans; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Julian Adlard; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Marc Tischkowitz; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Shirley Hodgson; Steve Ellis; Catherine Nogues; Christine Lasset; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Laurence Faivre; Pascaline Berthet; Maartje J Hooning; Lizet E van der Kolk; Carolien M Kets; Muriel A Adank; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Melissa Southey; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Ana Osorio; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Rita K Schmutzler; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Michael L Friedlander; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Eva Machackova; Lenka Foretova; Yen Y Tan; Christian F Singer; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Alexandra E Shields; Wylie Burke; Douglas E Levy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  27 in total

1.  Challenges in returning results in a genomic medicine implementation study: the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) study.

Authors:  David C Kochan; Erin Winkler; Noralane Lindor; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Janet Olson; Pedro J Caraballo; Robert Freimuth; Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Richard R Sharp; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

2.  The Ancestral Pace of Variant Reclassification.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Jacqueline Mersch; Nichole Brown; Sara Pirzadeh-Miller; Erin Mundt; Hannah C Cox; Krystal Brown; Melissa Aston; Lisa Esterling; Susan Manley; Theodora Ross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical Genetic Screening in Adult Patients with Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Enrico Cocchi; Jordan Gabriela Nestor; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the province of Ontario.

Authors:  Chloe Mighton; Conxi Lazaro; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Nicholas Watkins; Vanessa Di Gioacchino; Andrew Wong; Martin C Chang; George S Charames
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Biochemical and structural characterization of two variants of uncertain significance in the PMS2 gene.

Authors:  Brandon M D'Arcy; Jessa Blount; Aishwarya Prakash
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Kyle B Brothers; Sara Fitzgerald-Butt; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Leila Jamal; Cynthia A James; Gail P Jarvik; Jennifer B McCormick; Tanya N Nelson; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Julie Richer; Emmanuelle Souzeau; Jason L Vassy; Jennifer K Wagner; Howard P Levy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Variable population prevalence estimates of germline TP53 variants: A gnomAD-based analysis.

Authors:  Kelvin C de Andrade; Megan N Frone; Talia Wegman-Ostrosky; Payal P Khincha; Jung Kim; Amina Amadou; Karina M Santiago; Fernanda P Fortes; Nathanaël Lemonnier; Lisa Mirabello; Douglas R Stewart; Pierre Hainaut; Luiz P Kowalski; Sharon A Savage; Maria I Achatz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 9.  Practical Considerations and Challenges for Germline Genetic Testing in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Recommendations From the Germline Genetics Working Group of the PCCTC.

Authors:  Brittany M Szymaniak; Lauren A Facchini; Veda N Giri; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tomasz M Beer; Maria I Carlo; Daniel C Danila; Mallika Dhawan; Daniel George; Julie N Graff; Shilpa Gupta; Elisabeth Heath; Celestia S Higano; Glenn Liu; Ana M Molina; Channing J Paller; Akash Patnaik; Daniel P Petrylak; Zachery Reichert; Matthew B Rettig; Charles J Ryan; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Jake Vinson; Young E Whang; Alicia K Morgans; Heather H Cheng; Rana R McKay
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 10.  Navigating the nuances of clinical sequence variant interpretation in Mendelian disease.

Authors:  Natasha T Strande; Sarah E Brnich; Tamara S Roman; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.