| Literature DB >> 32887636 |
Xiao Geng1, Yang Li1, Feng Li1, Xinguang Wang1, Ke Zhang1, Zhongjun Liu1, Hua Tian2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aseptic cup loosening is still one of the main reasons leading to acetabular cup failures. 3D printing porous trabecular titanium metal acetabular cup may provide good initial stability and secondary fixation because of its highly interconnected, porous structure. Few large sample studies have reported the clinical outcomes of electron beam melting (EBM) porous titanium acetabular cup in Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Arthroplasty; Hip; Outcome; Trabecular titanium acetabular cup
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32887636 PMCID: PMC7487482 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01913-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1The picture shows the 3D ACT EBM-produced trabecular titanium acetabular cup (a) and the SEM image of its interconnected trabecular titanium cellular solid structure showed the porous architecture was designed based on a dodecahedron unit cell (b)
Demographic and clinical data of the patients
| Mean | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Male ( | 59.8 | 9.8 | 0.58 |
| Female ( | 58.7 | 8.9 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | Male ( | 26.0 | 4.9 | 0.51 |
| Female ( | 26.8 | 6.4 | ||
| Pre-Harris hip score | 45.2 | 4.8 | ||
| Pre-WOMAC score | 54.4 | 7.3 | ||
Fig. 2The picture shows the interface between the two layers of traditional cup (left) and the integration EBM porous structure (right). The EBM technique achieved the melting of thin layers of metal powder, modeling a bulk construct which respects the original metal alloy properties and integrates as a whole trabecular surface
Fig. 3The picture shows a 64-year-old male patient with acetabular protrusion caused by severe RA (a), underwent a 3D ACT primary THA with 3D printing augments for bone defect repair (b)
Follow-up of the clinical outcomes of patients using ACT cups (mean ± SD)
| Pre-op* | 6 months post-op** | 1 year post-op | 2 years post-op | Last follow up | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harris Hip Score | 54.4 ± 7.3 | 16.3 ± 6.2† | 13.6 ± 5.8† | 10.5 ± 3.7† | 11.2 ± 4.2† |
| WOMAC Score | 45.2 ± 4.8 | 90.5 ± 5.3† | 95.1 ± 4.5† | 96.7 ± 5.2† | 95.8 ± 6.0† |
†p < 0.001 when compared with preoperative scores
*Pre-op preoperative
**Post-op postoperative
Fig. 4The overall Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of implantation
Fig. 5The picture shows the radiographic assessments of a 61-year-old female patient with Crowe IV DDH, preoperatively (a) and 2 weeks (b), 3 months (c), 6 months (d), and 4 years (e) postoperatively. Radiolucent line (appeared on 4b and 4c, black arrow) vanished at about 6 months postoperatively represents new bone ingrowth