Literature DB >> 16523139

Radiographic signs of osseointegration in porous-coated acetabular components.

Milan S Moore1, James P McAuley, Anthony M Young, Charles A Engh.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There currently is no direct method to radiographically determine osseointegration of an uncemented, porous-coated acetabular component. We defined five radiographic signs for detecting acetabular osseointegration: (1) absence of radiolucent lines; (2) presence of a superolateral buttress; (3) medial stress-shielding; (4) radial trabeculae; and (5) an inferomedial buttress. We assessed their ability to predict acetabular osseointegration by reviewing the postprimary and prerevision radiographs from a series of 119 total hip arthroplasties that had revision surgery. Each sign had a high positive predictive value for the presence of bone ingrowth (range, 92.2-96.3%). The absence of radiolucent lines, presence of superolateral buttresses, and presence of medial stress-shielding were the most sensitive signs for indicating bone ingrowth. Ninety-seven percent of the cups with three to five signs were bone ingrown, whereas 83% of the cups with one or no signs were unstable. When three or more signs were present, the positive predictive value of the radio-graphic test was 96.9%, the sensitivity was 89.6%, and the specificity was 76.9%. The five signs of acetabular osseointegration reliably predicted osseointegration, especially when used in combination. They can be used as a tool for radio-graphically assessing the status of patients with porous-coated uncemented cups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level III (Study of nonconsecutive patients; without consistently applied reference "gold" standard). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16523139     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201149.14078.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  45 in total

1.  Retroacetabular stress-shielding in THA.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Akanksha Bhargava; Salil Pandit; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  S Mehdi Jafari; Benjamin Bender; Catelyn Coyle; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Chirayu Dwivedi; Sandeep Gokhale; Hyun Gon Khim; Jeon Keon Oh; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-09-06

4.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Alumina-on-alumina THA in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 5-year followup study.

Authors:  Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo García-Rey; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo; Jose Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Digital tomosynthesis with metal artifact reduction for assessing cementless hip arthroplasty: a diagnostic cohort study of 48 patients.

Authors:  Hao Tang; Dejin Yang; Shengjie Guo; Jing Tang; Jian Liu; Dacheng Wang; Yixin Zhou
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIB acetabular bone defects using a cup-on-cup technique: A surgical technique and case series.

Authors:  Yin-Qiao Du; Yu-Ping Liu; Jing-Yang Sun; Ming Ni; Yong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Outcomes of isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Bryan M Lawless; William L Healy; Sanjeev Sharma; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Patients report improvement in quality of life and satisfaction after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wael A Rahman; Nelson V Greidanus; Alexander Siegmeth; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in young patients: diagnosis is more important than age.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Rey; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.