Literature DB >> 32145319

A Quantitative Analysis of the Role of Oxygen Tension in FLASH Radiation Therapy.

Kristoffer Petersson1, Gabriel Adrian2, Karl Butterworth3, Stephen J McMahon4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent demonstrations of normal tissue sparing by high-dose, high-dose-rate FLASH radiation therapy have driven considerable interest in its application to improve clinical outcomes. However, significant uncertainty remains about the underlying mechanisms of FLASH sparing and how deliveries can be optimized to maximize benefit from this effect. Rapid oxygen depletion has been suggested as a potential mechanism by which these effects occur, but this has yet to be quantitatively tested against experimental data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Models of oxygen kinetics during irradiation were used to develop a time-dependent model of the oxygen enhancement ratio in mammalian cells that incorporates oxygen depletion. The characteristics of this model were then explored in terms of the dose and dose-rate dependence of the oxygen enhancement ratio. This model was also fit to experimental data from both in vitro and in vivo data sets.
RESULTS: In cases of FLASH radiation therapy, this model suggests that oxygen levels can be depleted by amounts that are sufficient to affect radiosensitivity only in conditions of intermediate oxygen tension, with no effect seen at high or very low initial oxygen levels. The model also effectively reproduced the dose, dose rate, and oxygen tension dependence of responses to FLASH radiation therapy in a range of systems, with model parameters compatible with published data.
CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen depletion provides a credible quantitative model to understand the biological effects of FLASH radiation therapy and is compatible with a range of experimental observations of FLASH sparing. These results highlight the need for more detailed quantification of oxygen depletion under high-dose-rate radiation exposures in relevant systems and the importance of oxygen tension in target tissues for FLASH sparing to be observed.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32145319     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   8.013


  21 in total

1.  Ultra-high dose rate effect on circulating immune cells: A potential mechanism for FLASH effect?

Authors:  Jian-Yue Jin; Anxin Gu; Weili Wang; Nancy L Oleinick; Mitchell Machtay; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Model studies of the role of oxygen in the FLASH effect.

Authors:  Vincent Favaudon; Rudi Labarbe; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Development of Ultra-High Dose-Rate (FLASH) Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Michele M Kim; Arash Darafsheh; Jan Schuemann; Ivana Dokic; Olle Lundh; Tianyu Zhao; José Ramos-Méndez; Lei Dong; Kristoffer Petersson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-22

4.  Ultrafast Tracking of Oxygen Dynamics During Proton FLASH.

Authors:  Mirna El Khatib; Alexander L Van Slyke; Anastasia Velalopoulou; Michele M Kim; Khayrullo Shoniyozov; Srinivasa Rao Allu; Eric E Diffenderfer; Theresa M Busch; Rodney D Wiersma; Cameron J Koch; Sergei A Vinogradov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 8.013

Review 5.  The importance of hypoxia in radiotherapy for the immune response, metastatic potential and FLASH-RT.

Authors:  Eui Jung Moon; Kristoffer Petersson; Monica M Olcina
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Quantification of Oxygen Depletion During FLASH Irradiation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Xu Cao; Rongxiao Zhang; Tatiana V Esipova; Srinivasa Rao Allu; Ramish Ashraf; Mahbubur Rahman; Jason R Gunn; Petr Bruza; David J Gladstone; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz; P Jack Hoopes; Sergei A Vinogradov; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 8.013

7.  Neuroprotection of Radiosensitive Juvenile Mice by Ultra-High Dose Rate FLASH Irradiation.

Authors:  Yasaman Alaghband; Samantha N Cheeks; Barrett D Allen; Pierre Montay-Gruel; Ngoc-Lien Doan; Benoit Petit; Patrik Goncalves Jorge; Erich Giedzinski; Munjal M Acharya; Marie-Catherine Vozenin; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation.

Authors:  Luis A Soto; Kerriann M Casey; Jinghui Wang; Alexandra Blaney; Rakesh Manjappa; Dylan Breitkreutz; Lawrie Skinner; Suparna Dutt; Ryan B Ko; Karl Bush; Amy S Yu; Stavros Melemenidis; Samuel Strober; Edgar Englemann; Peter G Maxim; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  LET-Dependent Intertrack Yields in Proton Irradiation at Ultra-High Dose Rates Relevant for FLASH Therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; N Domínguez-Kondo; J Schuemann; A McNamara; E Moreno-Barbosa; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  FLASH Proton Radiotherapy Spares Normal Epithelial and Mesenchymal Tissues While Preserving Sarcoma Response.

Authors:  Keith A Cengel; Amit Maity; Theresa M Busch; Anastasia Velalopoulou; Ilias V Karagounis; Gwendolyn M Cramer; Michele M Kim; Giorgos Skoufos; Denisa Goia; Sarah Hagan; Ioannis I Verginadis; Khayrullo Shoniyozov; June Chiango; Michelle Cerullo; Kelley Varner; Lutian Yao; Ling Qin; Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou; Andy J Minn; Mary Putt; Matthew Lanza; Charles-Antoine Assenmacher; Enrico Radaelli; Jennifer Huck; Eric Diffenderfer; Lei Dong; James Metz; Constantinos Koumenis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 13.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.