Literature DB >> 35767729

Impact of DNA Geometry and Scoring on Monte Carlo Track-Structure Simulations of Initial Radiation-Induced Damage.

Alejandro Bertolet1, José Ramos-Méndez2, Aimee McNamara1, Dohyeon Yoo1, Samuel Ingram3,4, Nicholas Henthorn3,4, John-William Warmenhoven3,4, Bruce Faddegon2, Michael Merchant3,4, Stephen J McMahon5, Harald Paganetti1, Jan Schuemann1.   

Abstract

Track structure Monte Carlo simulations are a useful tool to investigate the damage induced to DNA by ionizing radiation. These simulations usually rely on simplified geometrical representations of the DNA subcomponents. DNA damage is determined by the physical and physicochemical processes occurring within these volumes. In particular, damage to the DNA backbone is generally assumed to result in strand breaks. DNA damage can be categorized as direct (ionization of an atom part of the DNA molecule) or indirect (damage from reactive chemical species following water radiolysis). We also consider quasi-direct effects, i.e., damage originated by charge transfers after ionization of the hydration shell surrounding the DNA. DNA geometries are needed to account for the damage induced by ionizing radiation, and different geometry models can be used for speed or accuracy reasons. In this work, we use the Monte Carlo track structure tool TOPAS-nBio, built on top of Geant4-DNA, for simulation at the nanometer scale to evaluate differences among three DNA geometrical models in an entire cell nucleus, including a sphere/spheroid model specifically designed for this work. In addition to strand breaks, we explicitly consider the direct, quasi-direct, and indirect damage induced to DNA base moieties. We use results from the literature to determine the best values for the relevant parameters. For example, the proportion of hydroxyl radical reactions between base moieties was 80%, and between backbone, moieties was 20%, the proportion of radical attacks leading to a strand break was 11%, and the expected ratio of base damages and strand breaks was 2.5-3. Our results show that failure to update parameters for new geometric models can lead to significant differences in predicted damage yields. ©2022 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35767729      PMCID: PMC9458623          DOI: 10.1667/RADE-21-00179.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   3.372


  59 in total

1.  On the efficiency of hole and electron transfer from the hydration layer to DNA: An EPR study of crystalline DNA X-irradiated at 4 K.

Authors:  M G Debije; M D Strickler; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Complexity of damage produced by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  J F Ward
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2000

Review 3.  Track structure modeling in liquid water: A review of the Geant4-DNA very low energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.

Authors:  M A Bernal; M C Bordage; J M C Brown; M Davídková; E Delage; Z El Bitar; S A Enger; Z Francis; S Guatelli; V N Ivanchenko; M Karamitros; I Kyriakou; L Maigne; S Meylan; K Murakami; S Okada; H Payno; Y Perrot; I Petrovic; Q T Pham; A Ristic-Fira; T Sasaki; V Štěpán; H N Tran; C Villagrasa; S Incerti
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  An investigation on the capabilities of the PENELOPE MC code in nanodosimetry.

Authors:  M A Bernal; J A Liendo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events.

Authors:  H Nikjoo; P O'Neill; D T Goodhead; M Terrissol
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Nanodosimetric Simulation of Direct Ion-Induced DNA Damage Using Different Chromatin Geometry Models.

Authors:  N T Henthorn; J W Warmenhoven; M Sotiropoulos; R I Mackay; K J Kirkby; M J Merchant
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Influence of chromatin compaction on simulated early radiation-induced DNA damage using Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  N Tang; M Bueno; S Meylan; S Incerti; H N Tran; A Vaurijoux; G Gruel; C Villagrasa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Range of radiochemical damage to DNA with decay of iodine-125.

Authors:  R F Martin; W A Haseltine
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  In Silico Non-Homologous End Joining Following Ion Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks Predicts That Repair Fidelity Depends on Break Density.

Authors:  N T Henthorn; J W Warmenhoven; M Sotiropoulos; R I Mackay; N F Kirkby; K J Kirkby; M J Merchant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  LET-Dependent Intertrack Yields in Proton Irradiation at Ultra-High Dose Rates Relevant for FLASH Therapy.

Authors:  J Ramos-Méndez; N Domínguez-Kondo; J Schuemann; A McNamara; E Moreno-Barbosa; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.