Literature DB >> 32835715

Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity.

Charlan D Kroelinger1, Mary D Brantley2, Taleria R Fuller2, Ekwutosi M Okoroh2, Michael J Monsour2, Shanna Cox2, Wanda D Barfield2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of risk-appropriate maternal care is for high-risk pregnant women to receive specialized obstetrical services in facilities equipped with capabilities and staffing to provide care or transfer to facilities with resources available to provide care. In the United States, geographic access to critical care obstetrics varies. It is unknown whether this variation in proximity to critical care obstetrics differs by race, ethnicity, and region.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the geographic access, defined as residence within 50 miles of a facility capable of providing risk-appropriate critical care obstetrics services for women of reproductive age, by distribution of race and ethnicity. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive spatial analysis was used to assess geographic distance to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed geographically: nationally, by the Department of Health and Human Services regions, and by all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Dot density analysis was used to visualize geographic distributions of women by residence and critical care obstetrics facilities across the United States. Proximity analysis defined the proportion of women living within an approximate 50-mile radius of facilities. Source data included the 2015 American Community Survey from the United States Census Bureau and the 2015 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
RESULTS: Geographic access to critical care obstetrics was the greatest for Asian and Pacific Islander women of reproductive age (95.8%), followed by black (93.5%), Hispanic (91.4%), and white women of reproductive age (89.1%). American Indian and Alaska Native women had more limited geographic access (66%) in all regions. Visualization of proximity to critical care obstetrics indicated that facilities were predominantly located in urban areas, which may limit access to women in frontier or rural areas of states including nationally recognized reservations where larger proportions of white women and American Indian and Alaska Native women reside, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Disparities in proximity to critical care obstetrics exist in rural and frontier areas of the United States, which affect white women and American Indian and Alaska Native women, primarily. Examining insurance coverage, interstate hospital referral networks, and transportation barriers may provide further insight into critical care obstetrics accessibility. Further exploring the role of other equity-based measures of access on disparities beyond geography is warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care obstetrics; equity; frontier; health disparities; hospital; obstetrical care; region; risk-appropriate care; rural; women of reproductive age

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32835715      PMCID: PMC9199012          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   10.693


  60 in total

Review 1.  The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes.

Authors:  Paula Braveman; Laura Gottlieb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Mortality among infants of black as compared with white college-educated parents.

Authors:  K C Schoendorf; C J Hogue; J C Kleinman; D Rowley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and obstetric care.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T N Tita; George Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter VanDorsten
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA.

Authors:  N Douthit; S Kiv; T Dwolatzky; S Biswas
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 5.  Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.

Authors:  Alexis Gadson; Eloho Akpovi; Pooja K Mehta
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010-2013.

Authors:  Mary D Brantley; Nicole L Davis; David A Goodman; William M Callaghan; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Distance matters: Effect of geographic trauma system resource organization on fatal motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Joshua B Brown; Matthew R Rosengart; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Intersection of Living in a Rural Versus Urban Area and Race/Ethnicity in Explaining Access to Health Care in the United States.

Authors:  Julia T Caldwell; Chandra L Ford; Steven P Wallace; May C Wang; Lois M Takahashi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Access To Obstetric Services In Rural Counties Still Declining, With 9 Percent Losing Services, 2004-14.

Authors:  Peiyin Hung; Carrie E Henning-Smith; Michelle M Casey; Katy B Kozhimannil
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

Authors:  Scott M Sasser; Richard C Hunt; Mark Faul; David Sugerman; William S Pearson; Theresa Dulski; Marlena M Wald; Gregory J Jurkovich; Craig D Newgard; E Brooke Lerner
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2012-01-13
View more
  3 in total

1.  Is limited access to obstetric services associated with adverse birth outcomes? A cross-sectional study of Korean national birth data.

Authors:  Hye Sook Min; Saerom Kim; Seulgi Kim; Taeho Lee; Sun-Young Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Seung-Ah Choe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Seven years later: state neonatal risk-appropriate care policy consistency with the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Marion E Rice; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Carla L DeSisto; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Birth Volume and Geographic Distribution of US Hospitals With Obstetric Services From 2010 to 2018.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Heidi M Herrick; Julia D Interrante; Scott A Lorch; Katy B Kozhimannil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Elizabeth E Foglia
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.