Literature DB >> 27773712

Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010-2013.

Mary D Brantley1, Nicole L Davis1, David A Goodman2, William M Callaghan1, Wanda D Barfield1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of reproductive age, individual perinatal subspecialists (maternal-fetal medicine and neonatology), and obstetric and neonatal critical care facilities in the United States to identify gaps in health care access. STUDY
DESIGN: We used geographic visualization and conducted surface interpolation, nearest neighbor, and proximity analyses. Source data included 2010 US Census, October 2013 National Provider Index, 2012 American Hospital Association, 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality File, and the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory.
RESULTS: In October 2013, there were 2.5 neonatologists for every maternal-fetal medicine specialist in the United States. In 2012 there were 1.4 level III or higher neonatal intensive care units for every level III obstetric unit (hereafter, obstetric critical care unit). Nationally, 87% of women of reproductive age live within 50 miles of both an obstetric critical care unit and a neonatal intensive care unit. However, 18% of obstetric critical care units had no neonatal intensive care unit, and 20% of neonatal intensive care units had no obstetric critical care unit within a 10 mile radius. Additionally, 26% of obstetric critical care units had no maternal-fetal medicine specialist practicing within 10 miles of the facility, and 4% of neonatal intensive care units had no neonatologist practicing within 10 miles.
CONCLUSION: Gaps in access and discordance between the availability of level III or higher obstetric and neonatal care may affect the delivery of risk-appropriate care for high-risk maternal fetal dyads. Further study is needed to understand the importance of these gaps and discordance on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; geospatial; neonatal; obstetric; perinatal

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27773712     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of state risk-appropriate neonatal care policies with the 2012 AAP policy statement.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; David A Goodman; Sarah M Lasswell; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Neonatal Mortality After Interhospital Transfer of Pregnant Women for Imminent Very Preterm Birth in Illinois.

Authors:  Kshama P Shah; Raye-Ann O deRegnier; William A Grobman; Amanda C Bennett
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Evaluating disparities in access to obstetric services for American Indian women across Montana.

Authors:  Maggie L Thorsen; Sean Harris; Ronald McGarvey; Janelle Palacios; Andreas Thorsen
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Seven years later: state neonatal risk-appropriate care policy consistency with the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Marion E Rice; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Carla L DeSisto; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Infant Mortality in Rural and Nonrural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Hsiang-Hui Daphne Kuo; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 9.703

6.  Utilization of fetal fibronectin testing and pregnancy outcomes among women with symptoms of preterm labor.

Authors:  Sean C Blackwell; Erin M Sullivan; Allison A Petrilla; Xian Shen; Kathleen A Troeger; James D Byrne
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2017-10-03

7.  Pregnancy-Related ICU Admissions From 2008 to 2016 in China: A First Multicenter Report.

Authors:  Zhiling Zhao; Songyun Han; Gaiqi Yao; Shuangling Li; Wenxiong Li; Yangyu Zhao; Jie Qiao; Jianxin Zhang; Junli Lu; Liyuan Tao; Yue Han
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Evaluation of Neonatal Services Provided in a Level II NICU Utilizing Hybrid Telemedicine: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Abhishek Makkar; Mike McCoy; Gene Hallford; Arlen Foulks; Michael Anderson; Jennifer Milam; Marla Wehrer; Erica Doerfler; Edgardo Szyld
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Geographic access to critical care obstetrics for women of reproductive age by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Mary D Brantley; Taleria R Fuller; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Michael J Monsour; Shanna Cox; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 10.693

10.  Geospatial variation in caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer Vanderlaan; Johnathan A Edwards; Anne Dunlop
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.