Literature DB >> 22237112

Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011.

Scott M Sasser1, Richard C Hunt, Mark Faul, David Sugerman, William S Pearson, Theresa Dulski, Marlena M Wald, Gregory J Jurkovich, Craig D Newgard, E Brooke Lerner.   

Abstract

In the United States, injury is the leading cause of death for persons aged 1-44 years. In 2008, approximately 30 million injuries were serious enough to require the injured person to visit a hospital emergency department (ED); 5.4 million (18%) of these injured patients were transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On arrival at the scene of an injury, the EMS provider must determine the severity of injury, initiate management of the patient's injuries, and decide the most appropriate destination hospital for the individual patient. These destination decisions are made through a process known as "field triage," which involves an assessment not only of the physiology and anatomy of injury but also of the mechanism of the injury and special patient and system considerations. Since 1986, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) has provided guidance for the field triage process through its "Field Triage Decision Scheme." This guidance was updated with each version of the decision scheme (published in 1986, 1990, 1993, and 1999). In 2005, CDC, with financial support from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, collaborated with ACS-COT to convene the initial meetings of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage (the Panel) to revise the decision scheme; the revised version was published in 2006 by ACS-COT (American College of Surgeons. Resources for the optimal care of the injured patient: 2006. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2006). In 2009, CDC published a detailed description of the scientific rationale for revising the field triage criteria (CDC. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage. MMWR 2009;58[No. RR-1]). In 2011, CDC reconvened the Panel to review the 2006 Guidelines in the context of recently published literature, assess the experiences of states and local communities working to implement the Guidelines, and recommend any needed changes or modifications to the Guidelines. This report describes the dissemination and impact of the 2006 Guidelines; outlines the methodology used by the Panel for its 2011 review; explains the revisions and modifications to the physiologic, anatomic, mechanism-of-injury, and special considerations criteria; updates the schematic of the 2006 Guidelines; and provides the rationale used by the Panel for these changes. This report is intended to help prehospital-care providers in their daily duties recognize individual injured patients who are most likely to benefit from specialized trauma center resources and is not intended as a mass casualty or disaster triage tool. The Panel anticipates a review of these Guidelines approximately every 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep        ISSN: 1057-5987


  180 in total

1.  Evaluating age in the field triage of injured persons.

Authors:  Yoko Nakamura; Mohamud Daya; Eileen M Bulger; Martin Schreiber; Robert Mackersie; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; James F Holmes; Kristan Staudenmayer; Zachary Sturges; Michael Liao; Jason Haukoos; Nathan Kuppermann; Erik D Barton; Craig D Newgard
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Cost Savings in Trauma Systems: The Devil's in the Details.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Robert A Lowe
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Radiological mass casualty incident (MCI) workflow analysis: single-centre data of a mid-scale exercise.

Authors:  Fabian G Mueck; Kathrin Wirth; Maximilian Muggenthaler; Uwe Kreimeier; Lucas Geyer; Karl-Georg Kanz; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Stefan Wirth
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Cervical Spine Injury Risk Factors in Children With Blunt Trauma.

Authors:  Julie C Leonard; Lorin R Browne; Fahd A Ahmad; Hamilton Schwartz; Michael Wallendorf; Jeffrey R Leonard; E Brooke Lerner; Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  [Pretreatment mass casualty incident workflow analysis : Comparison of two level 1 trauma centers].

Authors:  F Mück; K Wirth; M Muggenthaler; K G Kanz; U Kreimeier; D Maxien; U Linsenmeier; W Mutschler; S Wirth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Do EMS Providers Accurately Ascertain Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use in Older Adults with Head Trauma?

Authors:  Daniel K Nishijima; Samuel Gaona; Trent Waechter; Ric Maloney; Troy Bair; Adam Blitz; Andrew R Elms; Roel D Farrales; Calvin Howard; James Montoya; Jeneita M Bell; Victor C Coronado; David E Sugerman; Dustin W Ballard; Kevin E Mackey; David R Vinson; James F Holmes
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  The Respiratory Rate: A Neglected Triage Tool for Pre-hospital Identification of Trauma Patients.

Authors:  John D Yonge; Phillip Kemp Bohan; Justin J Watson; Christopher R Connelly; Lynn Eastes; Martin A Schreiber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Plasma-first resuscitation to treat haemorrhagic shock during emergency ground transportation in an urban area: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Michael P Chapman; Kevin McVaney; Gary Bryskiewicz; Robert Blechar; Theresa Chin; Clay Cothren Burlew; Fredric Pieracci; F Bernadette West; Courtney D Fleming; Arsen Ghasabyan; James Chandler; Christopher C Silliman; Anirban Banerjee; Angela Sauaia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Components of traumatic brain injury severity indices.

Authors:  John D Corrigan; Scott Kreider; Jeffrey Cuthbert; John Whyte; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Mark Faul; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; Gale Whiteneck; Christopher R Pretz
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults.

Authors:  Craig D Newgard; Derek Richardson; James F Holmes; Thomas D Rea; Renee Y Hsia; N Clay Mann; Kristan Staudenmayer; Erik D Barton; Eileen M Bulger; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.