Charlan D Kroelinger1, Marion E Rice2, Ekwutosi M Okoroh3, Carla L DeSisto3, Wanda D Barfield3. 1. Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. ckroelinger@cdc.gov. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess consistency of state neonatal risk-appropriate care policies with the 2012 AAP policy seven years post-publication. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic, web-based review of all publicly available 2019 state neonatal levels of care policies. Information on infant risk (gestational age, birth weight), technology and equipment capabilities, and availability of specialty staffing used to define neonatal levels of care was extracted for review. RESULT: Half of states (50%) had a neonatal risk-appropriate care policy. Of those states, 88% had language consistent with AAP-defined Level I criteria, 80% with Level II, 56% with Level III, and 55% with Level IV. Comparing policies (2014-2019), consistency increased in state policies among all levels of care with the greatest increase among level IV criteria. CONCLUSION: States improved consistency of policy language by each level of care, though half of states still lack policy to provide minimum standards of care to the most vulnerable infants.
OBJECTIVE: To assess consistency of state neonatal risk-appropriate care policies with the 2012 AAP policy seven years post-publication. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic, web-based review of all publicly available 2019 state neonatal levels of care policies. Information on infant risk (gestational age, birth weight), technology and equipment capabilities, and availability of specialty staffing used to define neonatal levels of care was extracted for review. RESULT: Half of states (50%) had a neonatal risk-appropriate care policy. Of those states, 88% had language consistent with AAP-defined Level I criteria, 80% with Level II, 56% with Level III, and 55% with Level IV. Comparing policies (2014-2019), consistency increased in state policies among all levels of care with the greatest increase among level IV criteria. CONCLUSION: States improved consistency of policy language by each level of care, though half of states still lack policy to provide minimum standards of care to the most vulnerable infants.
Authors: Lindsey Nowakowski; Wanda D Barfield; Charlan D Kroelinger; Cassie B Lauver; Michele H Lawler; Vanessa A White; Lauren Raskin Ramos Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2012-01
Authors: Joseph Schulman; David Braun; Henry C Lee; Jochen Profit; Grace Duenas; Mihoko V Bennett; Robert J Dimand; Maria Jocson; Jeffrey B Gould Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Jochen Profit; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko Bennett; Benjamin A Goldstein; David Draper; Ciaran S Phibbs; Henry C Lee Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Susan R Hintz; Jeffrey B Gould; Mihoko V Bennett; Erika E Gray; Kimie J Kagawa; Joseph Schulman; Barbara Murphy; Grace Villarin-Duenas; Henry C Lee Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Matthew M Laughon; Debbie Avant; Nidhi Tripathi; Christoph P Hornik; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith; William Rodriguez Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 16.193