Literature DB >> 26000518

Racial and ethnic disparities in maternal morbidity and obstetric care.

William A Grobman1, Jennifer L Bailit, Madeline Murguia Rice, Ronald J Wapner, Uma M Reddy, Michael W Varner, John M Thorp, Kenneth J Leveno, Steve N Caritis, Jay D Iams, Alan T N Tita, George Saade, Dwight J Rouse, Sean C Blackwell, Jorge E Tolosa, J Peter VanDorsten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether racial and ethnic disparities exist in obstetric care and adverse outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed data from a cohort of women who delivered at 25 hospitals across the United States over a 3-year period. Race and ethnicity was categorized as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or Asian. Associations between race and ethnicity and severe postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, and severe perineal laceration at spontaneous vaginal delivery as well as between race and ethnicity and obstetric care (eg, episiotomy) relevant to the adverse outcomes were estimated by univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of 115,502 studied women, 95% were classified by one of the race and ethnicity categories. Non-Hispanic white women were significantly less likely to experience severe postpartum hemorrhage (1.6% non-Hispanic white compared with 3.0% non-Hispanic black compared with 3.1% Hispanic compared with 2.2% Asian) and peripartum infection (4.1% non-Hispanic white compared with 4.9% non-Hispanic black compared with 6.4% Hispanic compared with 6.2% Asian) than others (P<.001 for both). Severe perineal laceration at spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly more likely in Asian women (2.5% non-Hispanic white compared with 1.2% non-Hispanic black compared with 1.5% Hispanic compared with 5.5% Asian; P<.001). These disparities persisted in multivariable analysis. Many types of obstetric care examined also were significantly different according to race and ethnicity in both univariable and multivariable analysis. There were no significant interactions between race and ethnicity and hospital of delivery.
CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities exist for multiple adverse obstetric outcomes and types of obstetric care and do not appear to be explained by differences in patient characteristics or by delivery hospital. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26000518      PMCID: PMC4443856          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  54 in total

1.  Racial Disparities in Postpartum Pain Management.

Authors:  Nevert Badreldin; William A Grobman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  OB/GYN Providers' Knowledge of Racial and Ethnic Reproductive Health Disparities.

Authors:  Collin W Mueller; Carlos D Tavares; Geeta K Swamy; Haywood L Brown; Sarahn M Wheeler
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity prevalence and trends.

Authors:  Stephanie A Leonard; Elliott K Main; Karen A Scott; Jochen Profit; Suzan L Carmichael
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Early Elective Delivery Disparities between Non-Hispanic Black and White Women after Statewide Policy Implementation.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-12-19

5.  Factors associated with high-risk rural women giving birth in non-NICU hospital settings.

Authors:  K B Kozhimannil; P Hung; M M Casey; S A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Patient navigation across the spectrum of women's health care in the United States.

Authors:  Kathryn M McKenney; Noelle G Martinez; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Cesarean birth and maternal morbidity among Black women and White women after implementation of a blended payment policy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Sarah S Osmundson; Menolly Kaufman; Cori Blauer Peterson; Katy Backes Kozhimannil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Positive Deviance to Address Health Equity in Quality and Safety in Obstetrics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Zainab N Ahmed; Shoshanna Sofaer; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.190

9.  Putting the "M" back in maternal-fetal medicine: A 5-year report card on a collaborative effort to address maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Mary E D'Alton; Alexander M Friedman; Peter S Bernstein; Haywood L Brown; William M Callaghan; Steven L Clark; William A Grobman; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Daniel F O'Keeffe; Douglas M Montgomery; Sindhu K Srinivas; George D Wendel; Katharine D Wenstrom; Michael R Foley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Severe Maternal Morbidity, A Tale of 2 States Using Data for Action-Ohio and Massachusetts.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Conrey; Susan E Manning; Cynthia Shellhaas; Nicholas J Somerville; Sarah L Stone; Hafsatou Diop; Kristin Rankin; Dave Goodman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.