Literature DB >> 32831458

Taking the Relational Structure of Fractions Seriously: Relational Reasoning Predicts Fraction Knowledge in Elementary School Children.

Priya B Kalra1, Edward M Hubbard1, Percival G Matthews1.   

Abstract

Understanding and using symbolic fractions in mathematics is critical for access to advanced STEM concepts. However, children and adults consistently struggle with fractions. Here, we take a novel perspective on symbolic fractions, considering them within the framework of relational structures in cognitive psychology, such as those studied in analogy research. We tested the hypothesis that relational reasoning ability is important for reasoning about fractions by examining the relation between scores on a domain-general test of relational reasoning (TORR Jr.) and a test of fraction knowledge consisting of various types of fraction problems in 194 second grade and 145 fifth grade students. We found that relational reasoning was a significant predictor of fractions knowledge, even when controlling for non-verbal IQ and fractions magnitude processing for both grades. The effects of relational reasoning also remained significant when controlling for overall mathematics knowledge and skill for second graders but was attenuated for fifth graders. These findings suggest that this important subdomain of mathematical cognition is integrally tied to relational reasoning and opens the possibility that instruction targeting relational reasoning may prove to be a viable avenue for improving children's fractions skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fractions; numerical cognition; relational reasoning

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831458      PMCID: PMC7442207          DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0361-476X


  44 in total

Review 1.  Thinking about quantity: the intertwined development of spatial and numerical cognition.

Authors:  Nora S Newcombe; Susan C Levine; Kelly S Mix
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

2.  Calibration of the Test of Relational Reasoning.

Authors:  Denis Dumas; Patricia A Alexander
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2016-01-14

3.  Rational numbers: componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task.

Authors:  Gaëlle Meert; Jacques Grégoire; Marie-Pascale Noël
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning.

Authors:  Julie L Booth; Kristie J Newton; Laura K Twiss-Garrity
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-10-11

5.  Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong.

Authors:  Ty W Boyer; Susan C Levine; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2008-09

Review 6.  Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.

Authors:  G S Halford; W H Wilson; S Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  From continuous magnitudes to symbolic numbers: The centrality of ratio.

Authors:  Pooja G Sidney; Clarissa A Thompson; Percival G Matthews; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Improving Children's Knowledge of Fraction Magnitudes.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Casey A Kennedy; Robert S Siegler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Development of abstract thinking during childhood and adolescence: the role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Iroise Dumontheil
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.464

10.  The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qiaochu Fang; Florence C Gabriel; Dénes Szücs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.