Literature DB >> 18793078

Development of proportional reasoning: where young children go wrong.

Ty W Boyer1, Susan C Levine, Janellen Huttenlocher.   

Abstract

Previous studies have found that children have difficulty solving proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units until 10 to 12 years of age, but can solve parallel problems involving continuous quantities by 6 years of age. The present studies examine where children go wrong in processing proportions that involve discrete quantities. A computerized proportional equivalence choice task was administered to kindergartners through 4th-graders in Study 1, and to 1st- and 3rd-graders in Study 2. Both studies involved 4 between-subjects conditions that were formed by pairing continuous and discrete target proportions with continuous and discrete choice alternatives. In Study 1, target and choice alternatives were presented simultaneously; in Study 2, target and choice alternatives were presented sequentially. In both studies, children performed significantly worse when both the target and choice alternatives were represented with discrete quantities than when either or both of the proportions involved continuous quantities. Taken together, these findings indicate that children go astray on proportional reasoning problems involving discrete units only when a numerical match is possible, suggesting that their difficulty is due to an overextension of numerical equivalence concepts to proportional equivalence problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18793078      PMCID: PMC2597581          DOI: 10.1037/a0013110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  18 in total

1.  Perceptions of proportionality in young children: matching spatial ratios.

Authors:  C Sophian
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

Review 2.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; R Gelman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-08

3.  Reasoning about the height and location of a hidden object in 4.5- and 6.5-month-old infants.

Authors:  R Baillargeon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-01

4.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants.

Authors:  F Xu; E S Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-01-10

5.  The development of children's understanding of proportions.

Authors:  R H Chapman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1975-03

6.  Infants and toddlers discriminate amount: are they measuring?

Authors:  Janellen Huttenlocher; Sean Duffy; Susan Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-05

7.  The equality of quantity.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Children's probability intuitions: understanding the expected value of complex gambles.

Authors:  A Schlottmann
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

9.  Children's ability to make probability estimates: skills revealed through application of Anderson's functional measurement methodology.

Authors:  C Acredolo; J O'Connor; L Banks; K Horobin
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1989-08

10.  Ratio abstraction by 6-month-old infants.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Karen Wynn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-08
View more
  14 in total

1.  The influence of children's mathematical competence on performance in mental number line, time knowledge and time perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nazari; Saied Sabaghypour; Mina Pezhmanfard; Kiana Azizi; Shahram Vahedi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-04

2.  Non-symbolic division in childhood.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  I. INTRODUCTION: UNDERSTANDING MEDICINES AND MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS.

Authors:  Kristi L Lockhart; Frank C Keil
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2018-06

4.  A standardised set of images for judgements of proportion.

Authors:  Sara Varatojo; Leonor Lavradio; Alexandre Fernandes; Teresa Garcia-Marques
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-15

5.  The Role of Prior Knowledge and Intelligence in Gaining from a Training on Proportional Reasoning.

Authors:  Christian Thurn; Daniela Nussbaumer; Ralph Schumacher; Elsbeth Stern
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  Non-symbolic halving in an Amazonian indigene group.

Authors:  Koleen McCrink; Elizabeth S Spelke; Stanislas Dehaene; Pierre Pica
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-05

7.  Taking the Relational Structure of Fractions Seriously: Relational Reasoning Predicts Fraction Knowledge in Elementary School Children.

Authors:  Priya B Kalra; Edward M Hubbard; Percival G Matthews
Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol       Date:  2020-07-15

8.  More than the sum of its parts: Exploring the development of ratio magnitude versus simple magnitude perception.

Authors:  Yunji Park; Alexandria A Viegut; Percival G Matthews
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-10-24

9.  From Non-symbolic to Symbolic Proportions and Back: A Cuisenaire Rod Proportional Reasoning Intervention Enhances Continuous Proportional Reasoning Skills.

Authors:  Roberto A Abreu-Mendoza; Linsah Coulanges; Kendell Ali; Arthur B Powell; Miriam Rosenberg-Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-21

10.  Comparing apples and pears in studies on magnitude estimations.

Authors:  Mirjam Ebersbach; Koen Luwel; Lieven Verschaffel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.