| Literature DB >> 32825791 |
Cristina Chircov1, Angela Spoială1, Cătălin Păun1, Luminița Crăciun2, Denisa Ficai2, Anton Ficai1,3, Ecaterina Andronescu1,3, Ștefan Claudiu Turculeƫ4,5.
Abstract
In recent years, researchers focused their attention on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) owing to the considerable advancements of the characterization methods, especially electron microscopy methods, which allowed for a clear visualization of the pore structure and the materials encapsulated within the pores, along with the X-ray diffraction (small angles) methods and specific surface area determination by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique. Mesoporous silica gained important consideration in biomedical applications thanks to its tunable pore size, high surface area, surface functionalization possibility, chemical stability, and pore nature. Specifically, the nature of the pores allows for the encapsulation and release of anti-cancer drugs into tumor tissues, which makes MSN ideal candidates as drug delivery carriers in cancer treatment. Moreover, the inner and outer surfaces of the MSN provide a platform for further functionalization approaches that could enhance the adsorption of the drug within the silica network and the selective targeting and controlled release to the desired site. Additionally, stimuli-responsive mesoporous silica systems are being used as mediators in cancer therapy, and through the release of the therapeutic agents hosted inside the pores under the action of specific triggering factors, it can selectively deliver them into tumor tissues. Another important application of the mesoporous silica nanomaterials is related to its ability to extract different hazardous species from aqueous media, some of these agents being antibiotics, pesticides, or anti-tumor agents. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the methods of MSN synthesis and related characteristics, the available surface functionalization strategies, and the most important applications of MSN in adsorption as well as release studies. Owing to the increasing antibiotic resistance, the need for developing materials for antibiotic removal from wastewaters is important and mesoporous materials already proved remarkable performances in environmental applications, including removal or even degradation of hazardous agents such as antibiotics and pesticides.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical applications; functionalization; mesoporous silica nanoparticles; synthesis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825791 PMCID: PMC7503268 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25173814
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
The characteristics of the main mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). MCM, Mobil Crystalline Materials or Mobil Composition of Matter; SBA, Santa Barbara amorphous; FSM, folded sheets of mesoporous materials; TUD, Technical Delft University; HMM, Hiroshima Mesoporous Material; COK, Centrum voor Oppervlaktechemie en Katalyse/Centre for Research Chemistry and Catalysis; FDU, Fudan University.
| MSN Type | Dimensionality and Crystal System | Space Group | Pore Size [nm] | Surface Area [m2/g] | Pore Volume [cm3/g] | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2D hexagonal | P6mm | 1.5–8 | 900–2100 | >1 | [ |
|
| cubic | Ia3d | 1.5–6.5 | 900–1500 | >1 | [ |
|
| lamellar | p2 | 2–5 | n.a. | >1 | [ |
|
| cubic | Pm3m | 2.1–3.6 | n.a. | 0.68 | [ |
|
| 3D hexagonal | P63/mmc | 3.1 | n.a. | 0.83 | [ |
|
| 2D hexagonal | p6mm | 6–10 | 662 | 1.17 | [ |
|
| cubic | Im3m | 5–15 | 1000 | 0.91 | [ |
|
| 2D hexagonal | p6mm | 3.2–3.9 | 500–900 | 0.96 | [ |
|
| disordered | - | 2.5–25 | 300–1000 | 0.5–1.7 | [ |
|
| disordered | - | 4–15 | - | - | [ |
|
| hexagonal | P6m | 5.5–6 | 860 | 0.45–1.23 | [ |
|
| cubic | Fd3m | 2.3–3 | 960 | 0.98 | [ |
|
| tetragonal | P4/mmm | 2.7 | 1490 | 1.88 | [ |
|
| cubic | Fm3m | 36 | 250–450 | 0.27–0.48 | [ |
|
| orthorhombic | Pmmm | 1.7 | 1210 | 1.83 | [ |
n.a., information not available.
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images for calcined Mobil Crystalline Materials or Mobil Composition of Matter (MCM)-41 (a), MCM-48 (b), and Santa Barbara amorphous (SBA)-15 (c). Reprinted from an open access source [40].
Figure 2A schematic diagram of the processes involved in the synthesis of MCM-41.
Figure 3A schematic diagram of the processes involved in the synthesis of MCM-48.
Figure 4A schematic diagram of the processes involved in the synthesis of MCM-50.
The pH, silica precursor, surfactant, and additives required for the synthesis of MSN.
| MSN Type | pH | Silica Precursor | Surfactant | Additives |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| basic | TEOS, TMOS | CTAB, cetyltrimethylammonium tosylate, cetyltrimethylammonium chloride, Pluronic F68 | - |
|
| basic | TEOS | CTAB | - |
|
| basic | TEOS, TMOS | Gemini surfactants | |
|
| acid | TEOS, TMOS | Pluronic P123 | - |
|
| acid | TEOS | Pluronic P123, Pluronic F127 | potassium chloride |
|
| acid | TEOS | Pluronic F123 | 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, xylene, toluene, potassium chloride |
Figure 5The main strategies for surface functionalization: (a) post-synthetic grafting; (b) co-condensation; (c) post-synthetic grafting followed by template removal.
Figure 6The main exogenous and endogenous stimuli involved in stimuli-responsive mesoporous silica systems.
Figure 7The possibilities of attaching (macro)molecules on the surface of MSN for active targeting. Reprinted from an open access source [16].
Figure 8The applications of nanomaterials in the cosmetic field. Reprinted from an open access source [139].