| Literature DB >> 28788030 |
Wang Qian1, Haiqing Wang2, Jin Chen3, Yan Kong4.
Abstract
Spherical MCM-48 mesoporous sieve co-doped with vanadium and iron was successfully synthesized via one-step hydrothermal method. The material was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms, inductively coupled plasma (ICP), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra, and X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) techniques. Results indicated that the V-Fe-MCM-48 showed an ordered 3D cubic mesostructure with spherical morphology, narrow pore size distribution and high specific surface area. Most of vanadium and iron atoms existing as tetrahedral V4+ and Fe3+ species were co-doped into the silicate framework. The particle sizes of V-Fe-MCM-48 were smaller and the specific area was much higher than those of of V-MCM-48. Additionally, the synthesized V-Fe-MCM-48 exhibited improved hydrothermal stability compared with the pure MCM-48.Entities:
Keywords: MCM-48; co-doping; hydrothermal stability; mesoporous sieve; morphology
Year: 2015 PMID: 28788030 PMCID: PMC5507026 DOI: 10.3390/ma8041752
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Small-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and (b) wide-angle XRD patterns of the calcined Si- and V-Fe-MCM-48 samples.
Figure 2Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the calcined Si- and V-Fe-MCM-48 samples. The inset shows the pore size distribution (PSD).
Textural and structural parameters of the calcined Si- and V-Fe-MCM-48 samples.
| Sample | V/Si a | V/Si b | Fe/Si a | Fe/Si b | d211 | a0 c | dp d | as, BET | tw e | Vp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Molar Ratio) | (Molar Ratio) | (Molar Ratio) | (Molar Ratio) | (nm) | (nm) | (nm) | (m2/g) | (nm) | (cm3/g) | |
| Si-MCM-48 | — | — | — | — | 3.59 | 8.80 | 2.39 | 1369.4 | 1.65 | 0.832 |
| V-Fe-MCM-48 | 0.0296 | 0.0066 | 0.0062 | 0.0021 | 3.81 | 9.33 | 2.46 | 1213.2 | 1.79 | 0.777 |
Notes: a ICP results; b XPS results; c Unit cell parameter: a0 = 61/2d211; d Pore diameter determined by BJH method using the desorption branch; e Wall thickness: tw = a0/3.0919 − dp/2.
Figure 3(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image and (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the calcined V-Fe-MCM-48 sample.
Figure 4UV-vis spectra of calcined samples.
Figure 5X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of (a) V 2p3/2 and (b) Fe 2p from the calcined V-Fe-MCM-48 sample.
Figure 6XRD patterns of the calcined (a) Si-MCM-48 and (b) V-Fe-MCM-48 samples after hydrothermal treatment at 110 °C for different time.
Figure 7TEM image of the V-Fe-MCM-48 sample after 72 h hydrothermal treatment.
Structural parameters of the Si- and V-Fe-MCM-48 samples with different treatment time.
| Time (h) | MCM-48 | V-Fe-MCM-48 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d211 (nm) | a0 a (nm) | V/Si a (Molar Ratio) | Fe/Si b (Molar Ratio) | d211 (nm) | a0 a (nm) | |
| 0 | 3.59 | 8.80 | 0.0296 | 0.0066 | 3.81 | 9.33 |
| 24 | 3.56 | 8.72 | 0.0107 | 0.0041 | 3.70 | 9.06 |
| 48 | – | – | 0.0079 | 0.0028 | 3.68 | 9.01 |
| 72 | – | – | 0.0062 | 0.0021 | 3.56 | 8.72 |
| 96 | – | – | 0.0048 | 0.0014 | – | – |
Notes: a Unit cell parameter: a0 = 61/2d211; b ICP results.
Figure 8Development of (a) the unit cell parameter a0 of MCM-48 and V-Fe-MCM-48 and (b) content of V and Fe in V-Fe-MCM-48 with the time of hydrothermal treatment.