Literature DB >> 19850098

Assessment of dermal toxicity of nanosilica using cultured keratinocytes, a human skin equivalent model and an in vivo model.

Yoon-Hee Park1, Ji Na Kim, Sang Hoon Jeong, Jae Eun Choi, Seung-Ho Lee, Byeong Hyeok Choi, Jung Pyo Lee, Kyung Hee Sohn, Kui Lea Park, Meyoung-Kon Kim, Sang Wook Son.   

Abstract

Assessments of skin irritation potentials are important aspects of the development of nanotechnology. Nanosilica is currently being widely used for commercial purposes, but little literature is available on its skin toxicity and irritation potential. This study was designed to determine whether nanosilica has the potential to cause acute cutaneous toxicity, using cultured HaCaT keratinocytes (CHK), a human skin equivalent model (HSEM), and invivo model. Nanosilica was characterized by scanning electron microscopy. We evaluated the cytotoxic effects of nanosilica on CHKs and the HSEM. In addition, we also investigated whether two commercially available nanosilicas with different sizes (7 and 10-20 nm) have different effects. To confirm invitro results, we evaluated the irritation potentials of nanosilicas on rabbit skin. Nanosilicas reduced the cell viabilities of CHKs in a dose-dependent manner. However, the HSEM revealed no irritation at 500 microg/ml of nanosilica. Furthermore, this result concurred with Draize skin irritation test findings. The present study data indicate that nanosilica does not cause acute cutaneous irritation. Furthermore, this study shows that the HSEM used provides more useful screening data than the conventional cell culture model on the relative toxicities of NPs. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19850098     DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  14 in total

1.  Assessment of the in vitro dermal irritation potential of cerium, silver, and titanium nanoparticles in a human skin equivalent model.

Authors:  Vivek A Miyani; Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.820

2.  Focusing the research efforts.

Authors:  Françoise Schrurs; Dominique Lison
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 3.  Engineered nanomaterials: an emerging class of novel endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Jeremy K Larson; Michael J Carvan; Reinhold J Hutz
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Skin Equivalent Models: Protocols for In Vitro Reconstruction for Dermal Toxicity Evaluation.

Authors:  Tatiana do Nascimento Pedrosa; Carolina Motter Catarino; Paula Comune Pennacchi; Silvia Berlanga de Moraes Barros; Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 5.  Biocompatibility assessment of Si-based nano- and micro-particles.

Authors:  Hamsa Jaganathan; Biana Godin
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  The impact of nanomaterials in immune system.

Authors:  Jiyoung Jang; Dae-Hyoun Lim; In-Hong Choi
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.303

7.  Toxicology and clinical potential of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lara Yildirimer; Nguyen T K Thanh; Marilena Loizidou; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 20.722

8.  Effects of Essential Oils and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Canine Skin Equivalents: Skin Lipid Assessment and Morphological Evaluation.

Authors:  S Cerrato; L Ramió-Lluch; D Fondevila; D Rodes; P Brazis; A Puigdemont
Journal:  J Vet Med       Date:  2013-11-06

Review 9.  Current investigations into the genotoxicity of zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles in mammalian models in vitro and in vivo: carcinogenic/genotoxic potential, relevant mechanisms and biomarkers, artifacts, and limitations.

Authors:  Jee Young Kwon; Preeyaporn Koedrith; Young Rok Seo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Genetic toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles using a 3D in vitro skin model (EpiDerm™).

Authors:  John W Wills; Nicole Hondow; Adam D Thomas; Katherine E Chapman; David Fish; Thierry G Maffeis; Mark W Penny; Richard A Brown; Gareth J S Jenkins; Andy P Brown; Paul A White; Shareen H Doak
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.