Literature DB >> 32507015

Radiation Effective Dose Above 100 mSv From Fluoroscopically Guided Intervention: Frequency and Patient Medical Condition.

Xinhua Li1, Joshua A Hirsch1, Madan M Rehani1, Suvranu Ganguli1, Kai Yang1, Bob Liu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to investigate the medical condition of patients who received substantial cumulative effective dose (CED) in fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 25,253 patients (mean age, 58.2 years; 50.6% male) who underwent 46,491 FGI procedures at a tertiary care center in the United States from January 2010 to January 2019. Radiation dosage data were retrieved from an in-house semiautomated dose-tracking system. A cohort was identified as those who received a CED of 100 mSv or greater and was categorized by medical disorder from longitudinal medical records. Statistical software was used to determine mean value, five percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th), and interquartile range for age and dose. RESULTS. Among 1011 (4.0%) patients (30.4% female) with a CED of 100 mSv or more, the median number of procedures was 2.0, the median age at first procedure was 60.0 years old, and the median value of CED was 177.2 mSv. The patients' medical disorders included cancer (36.7%), chronic disease of the torso (30.0%), internal bleeding (24.8%), trauma (4.6%), organ transplant (3.2%) and cerebrovascular disease (0.7%). Eight-hundred (79.1%) patients underwent all of their procedures within 365 days. CONCLUSION. This is the first cohort study of the medical condition of patients receiving substantial cumulative doses from FGI procedures over a long period. In the critical care of patients with serious medical disorders, 4.0% of patients may be exposed to substantial radiation dose (CED ≥ 100 mSv). The risks associated with such a high level of radiation warrant continued attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cumulative radiation exposure; effective dose; fluoroscopy; interventional radiology; medical condition

Year:  2020        PMID: 32507015     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  Challenges for managing the cumulative effective dose for patients.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The radiation doses and radiation protection on the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures.

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Agnieszka Kuchcińska; Roberta Matheoud; Alfredo Muni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  CVIR Special Issue on Radiation Protection.

Authors:  Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging.

Authors:  Charles Brower; Madan M Rehani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

7.  European consensus on patient contact shielding.

Authors:  Peter Hiles; Patrick Gilligan; John Damilakis; Eric Briers; Cristian Candela-Juan; Dario Faj; Shane Foley; Guy Frija; Claudio Granata; Hugo de Las Heras Gala; Ruben Pauwels; Marta Sans Merce; Georgios Simantirakis; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 8.  Dosimetric quantities and effective dose in medical imaging: a summary for medical doctors.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Guy Frija; Reinhard Loose; Graciano Paulo; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Claudio Granata; Jonas Andersson
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 9.  Radiation protection perspective to recurrent medical imaging: what is known and what more is needed?

Authors:  Jenia Vassileva; Ola Holmberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Comparison of radiation exposure between endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage and transpapillary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for pancreatobiliary diseases.

Authors:  Mamoru Takenaka; Makoto Hosono; Madan M Rehani; Yasutaka Chiba; Rei Ishikawa; Ayana Okamoto; Tomohiro Yamazaki; Atsushi Nakai; Shunsuke Omoto; Kosuke Minaga; Ken Kamata; Kentaro Yamao; Shiro Hayashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.