Literature DB >> 32816611

Motor memories in manipulation tasks are linked to contact goals between objects.

Michael R McGarity-Shipley1, James B Heald2, James N Ingram2, Jason P Gallivan1,3, Daniel M Wolpert2, J Randall Flanagan1.   

Abstract

Skillful manipulation requires forming memories of object dynamics, linking applied force to motion. Although it has been assumed that such memories are linked to objects, a recent study showed that people can form separate memories when these are linked to different controlled points on an object (Heald JB, Ingram JN, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM. Nat Hum Behav 2: 300-311, 2018). In that study, participants controlled the handle of a robotic device to move a virtual bar with circles (control points) on the left and right sides. Participants were instructed to move either the left or right control point to a target on the left or right, respectively, such that the required movement was constant. When these control points were paired with opposing force fields, adaptation was observed. In this previous study, both the controlled point and the target changed between contexts. To assess which of these factors is critical for learning, here, we used a similar paradigm but with a bar that automatically rotated as it was moved. In the first experiment, the bar rotated, such that the left and right control points moved to a common target. In the second experiment, the bar rotated such that a single control point moved to a target located on either the left or right. In both experiments, participants were able to learn opposing force fields applied in the two contexts. We conclude that separate memories of dynamics can be formed for different "contact goals," involving a unique combination of the controlled point on an object and the target location this point "contacts."NEW & NOTEWORTHY Skilled manipulation requires forming memories of object dynamics, previously assumed to be associated with entire objects. However, we recently demonstrated that people can form multiple motor memories when explicitly instructed to move different locations on an object to different targets. Here, we show that separate motor memories can be learned for different contact goals, which involve a unique combination of a control point and target.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor control; motor learning; motor memory; movement planning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32816611      PMCID: PMC7509295          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00252.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  39 in total

1.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Short-term plasticity of the primary somatosensory cortex during tool use.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Yvonne Rothemund; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Tools for the body (schema).

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Limited transfer of learning between unimanual and bimanual skills within the same limb.

Authors:  Daichi Nozaki; Isaac Kurtzer; Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Control strategies in object manipulation tasks.

Authors:  J Randall Flanagan; Miles C Bowman; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gone in 0.6 seconds: the encoding of motor memories depends on recent sensorimotor states.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; David W Franklin; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Consolidation in human motor memory.

Authors:  T Brashers-Krug; R Shadmehr; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control.

Authors:  Ian S Howard; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan; Evan Cesanek; Zhaoran Zhang; James N Ingram
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.713

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.