Literature DB >> 34796873

Motor memories of object dynamics are categorically organized.

Daniel M Wolpert1,2, J Randall Flanagan3, Evan Cesanek1,2, Zhaoran Zhang1,2, James N Ingram1,2.   

Abstract

The ability to predict the dynamics of objects, linking applied force to motion, underlies our capacity to perform many of the tasks we carry out on a daily basis. Thus, a fundamental question is how the dynamics of the myriad objects we interact with are organized in memory. Using a custom-built three-dimensional robotic interface that allowed us to simulate objects of varying appearance and weight, we examined how participants learned the weights of sets of objects that they repeatedly lifted. We find strong support for the novel hypothesis that motor memories of object dynamics are organized categorically, in terms of families, based on covariation in their visual and mechanical properties. A striking prediction of this hypothesis, supported by our findings and not predicted by standard associative map models, is that outlier objects with weights that deviate from the family-predicted weight will never be learned despite causing repeated lifting errors.
© 2021, Cesanek et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  categories; human; mechanical properties; memory; motor learning; neuroscience; object manipulation; predictive control

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34796873      PMCID: PMC8635978          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.71627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.713


  115 in total

Review 1.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector; Z Kourtzi; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Does the motor control system use multiple models and context switching to cope with a variable environment?

Authors:  A Karniel; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Lighter or heavier than predicted: neural correlates of corrective mechanisms during erroneously programmed lifts.

Authors:  Per Jenmalm; Christina Schmitz; Hans Forssberg; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Living in a material world: how visual cues to material properties affect the way that we lift objects and perceive their weight.

Authors:  Gavin Buckingham; Jonathan S Cant; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Representation of object weight in human ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Jonathan S Cant; Melvyn A Goodale; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Representing multiple object weights: competing priors and sensorimotor memories.

Authors:  Lee A Baugh; Amelie Yak; Roland S Johansson; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Multiple motor memories are learned to control different points on a tool.

Authors:  James B Heald; James N Ingram; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-04-09

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reach adaption to a visuomotor gain with terminal error feedback involves reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Ikegami; J Randall Flanagan; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.