Savvas Louka1,2, Sarah M Barry3, Derren J Heyes1,4, M Qadri E Mubarak1,2, Hafiz Saqib Ali1,4, Lona M Alkhalaf3, Andrew W Munro1,4, Nigel S Scrutton1,4, Gregory L Challis3,5,6, Sam P de Visser1,2. 1. The Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, 131 Princess Street, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Mancheste M13 9PL, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia. 6. ARC Centre for Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Abstract
The cytochromes P450 are heme-dependent enzymes that catalyze many vital reaction processes in the human body related to biodegradation and biosynthesis. They typically act as mono-oxygenases; however, the recently discovered P450 subfamily TxtE utilizes O2 and NO to nitrate aromatic substrates such as L-tryptophan. A direct and selective aromatic nitration reaction may be useful in biotechnology for the synthesis of drugs or small molecules. Details of the catalytic mechanism are unknown, and it has been suggested that the reaction should proceed through either an iron(III)-superoxo or an iron(II)-nitrosyl intermediate. To resolve this controversy, we used stopped-flow kinetics to provide evidence for a catalytic cycle where dioxygen binds prior to NO to generate an active iron(III)-peroxynitrite species that is able to nitrate l-Trp efficiently. We show that the rate of binding of O2 is faster than that of NO and also leads to l-Trp nitration, while little evidence of product formation is observed from the iron(II)-nitrosyl complex. To support the experimental studies, we performed density functional theory studies on large active site cluster models. The studies suggest a mechanism involving an iron(III)-peroxynitrite that splits homolytically to form an iron(IV)-oxo heme (Compound II) and a free NO2 radical via a small free energy of activation. The latter activates the substrate on the aromatic ring, while compound II picks up the ipso-hydrogen to form the product. The calculations give small reaction barriers for most steps in the catalytic cycle and, therefore, predict fast product formation from the iron(III)-peroxynitrite complex. These findings provide the first detailed insight into the mechanism of nitration by a member of the TxtE subfamily and highlight how the enzyme facilitates this novel reaction chemistry.
The cytochromes P450 are heme-dependent enzymes that catalyze many vital reaction processes in the human body related to biodegradation and biosynthesis. They typically act as mono-oxygenases; however, the recently discovered P450 subfamily TxtE utilizes O2 and NO to nitrate aromatic substrates such as L-tryptophan. A direct and selective aromatic nitration reaction may be useful in biotechnology for the synthesis of drugs or small molecules. Details of the catalytic mechanism are unknown, and it has been suggested that the reaction should proceed through either an iron(III)-superoxo or an iron(II)-nitrosyl intermediate. To resolve this controversy, we used stopped-flow kinetics to provide evidence for a catalyticcycle where dioxygen binds prior to NO to generate an active iron(III)-peroxynitrite species that is able to nitratel-Trp efficiently. We show that the rate of binding of O2 is faster than that of NO and also leads to l-Trp nitration, while little evidence of product formation is observed from the iron(II)-nitrosylcomplex. To support the experimental studies, we performed density functional theory studies on large active site cluster models. The studies suggest a mechanism involving an iron(III)-peroxynitrite that splits homolytically to form an iron(IV)-oxo heme (Compound II) and a free NO2 radical via a small free energy of activation. The latter activates the substrate on the aromatic ring, whilecompound II picks up the ipso-hydrogen to form the product. The calculations give small reaction barriers for most steps in the catalyticcycle and, therefore, predict fast product formation from the iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplex. These findings provide the first detailed insight into the mechanism of nitration by a member of the TxtE subfamily and highlight how the enzyme facilitates this novel reaction chemistry.
The cytochromes P450
(P450s or CYPs) are vital enzymes for human
health with, e.g., key functions in the liver related to the metabolism
of drugs and xenobiotics; and as such their activity and reactivity
is of interest to drug delivery and development.[1−5] In addition, they also catalyze key steps in the
biosynthesis of natural products and hormones, including estrogen.[6−10] Their diverse reactivities and ability to activate inert C–H
bonds have resulted in the P450s gaining significant interest due
to their potential as biocatalysts in the synthesis of high value
chemicals.[11−13] However, factors including requirement for expensive
redox partners, as well as a lack of knowledge of many facets of their
structure and activity, has limited their applications. The P450s
contain a heme prosthetic group that is linked to the protein via
a proximal coordination to the hemeironthrough a cysteinate residue.[14−16] The P450s typically react as mono-oxygenases, where they transfer
one atom of molecular oxygen to a substrate, while the second oxygen
atom of O2 is reduced to water.[1−4,17−19] In general, P450s, can catalyze diverse reactions,
including aliphatic or aromatic hydroxylation, epoxidation and sulfoxidation,
in addition to pathways leading to desaturation, C–C bond cleavage
and O-dealkylation.[20,21] P450 isozymes
show substantial differences in catalytic properties and the shape
and size of the substrate binding pocket. Consequently, many questions
remain related to their catalyticcycle and substrate activation processes.Recently, two novel P450 subfamilies were discovered that are able
to regiospecifically nitrate aromatic amino acids including L-tryptophan and l-tyrosine.[22−31] The P450 TxtE isozyme activates L-tryptophan at the 4-position,
while the P450 RufO isozyme binds l-tyrosine and adds an
NO2 group to the 3-position. In actinobacteria, TxtEcatalyzed
nitration is part of the biosynthetic pathway of the phytotoxin thaxtomin
in Streptomyces scabies, whiletyrosine nitration
catalyzed by RufO is a key step in the biosynthesis of rufomycin,
a natural product peptide antibiotic with activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Furthermore, the l-Phe
residue in the N,N-dimethyl-diketopiperazine
intermediate in thaxtomin biosynthesis is hydroxylated at the Cα and aromatic ring positions by the bifunctional P450
TxtC.[22−24,32−34] The substrate nitration reactions are not restricted to one class
of P450 isozymes, as addition of peroxynitrite to the mono-oxygenase
P450 3A4 was found to lead to tyrosine nitration efficiently.[35] Direct and selective aromatic nitration is difficult
to achieve chemically and thus enzyme catalyzed processes have significant
potential in biotechnology and therefore we decided to investigate
the catalytic mechanism of the P450 TxtE enzyme using a combined experimental
and computational approach.A TxtEcrystal structure was reported
with the substrate l-Trp bound,[24] and an extract of the active
site is shown in Figure a. The hemeiron is bound to the thiolate group of Cys357, the proximal/axial ligand, and the l-Trp substrate is
positioned in the active site in a tight orientation with hydrogen
bonding interactions to several amino acids, including Arg59 (Figure ). Unfortunately,
due to their transient nature, few catalyticcycle intermediates have
been identified and characterized for P450 TxtE. However, it has been
established that the enzyme binds L-tryptophan in the active
site and utilizes O2 and NO to convert the substrate to
L-4-nitrotryptophan selectively, using external redox partners for
provision of electrons.[22−24] Free superoxide (O2−•) and NO in a water environment react
within the diffusion limit to form peroxynitrite efficiently.[36] However, on a metalcenter the order of binding
of NO versus O2 determines the reaction products and the
formation of nitrate, nitrite, or peroxynitrite, which all react differently
with substrates.[36] A catalyticcycle of
TxtE was hypothesized that proceeds via an iron(III)-peroxynitrite
intermediate.[22] Previous studies on myoglobin-bound
peroxynitrite showed that, with an open substrate-binding pocket that
is accessible to protons, the peroxynitrite was quickly converted
to nitrate and no aromatic nitration was observed.[37]
Figure 1
(a) Active site structure of P450 TxtE as taken from the 4TPO PDB file. (b) Proposed
reaction mechanism of dioxygen and NO activation of the heme in TxtE
and possible reactive intermediates considered here. (c) Overall nitration
reaction catalyzed by P450 TxtE.
(a) Active site structure of P450 TxtE as taken from the 4TPO PDB file. (b) Proposed
reaction mechanism of dioxygen and NO activation of the heme in TxtE
and possible reactive intermediates considered here. (c) Overall nitration
reaction catalyzed by P450 TxtE.Little is known about the catalyticcycle of P450 TxtE and only
the ferric-H2O resting state (Figure a) and the water-displaced ferric states
have been characterized.[22−24] A P450 TxtEcatalyticcycle has
been proposed where substrate binding displaces the water molecule
from the resting state and, after hemeiron reduction, is followed
by dioxygen binding to form an iron(II)-dioxygen or an iron(III)-superoxo
intermediate, which subsequently reacts with NO to form a ferric-peroxynitrite
intermediate.[22] The ferric-peroxynitritecomplex could react directly with substrate or either homolytically
cleave to form an iron(IV)-oxo species called Compound II (CpdII)
and NO2•, or heterolytically cleave to
give an iron(IV)-oxo heme cation radicalcalled Compound I and NO2–. This would give the P450 nitration isozymes
a distinctive catalyticcycle that deviates from the P450 mono-oxygenases,
wherein the ferric-superoxo form is reduced and doubly protonated
to form CpdI and a water molecule.[16−18,38−42] Spectroscopic and kinetic studies characterized CpdI as the active
species in the Pseudomonas putida P450 CAM enzyme.[43] Although the one-electron reduced form of CpdI,
i.e. CpdII, is not part of the mono-oxygenase catalyticcycle, it
can be formed upon reduction of CpdI.Another heme-dependent
enzyme, namely nitric oxide synthase (NOS),
has also been shown to activate peroxynitrite.[44,45] However, in the NOS enzymes, addition of excess peroxynitrite led
to the production of the ferrous-nitrosyl species instead. A similar
observation was made for P450 BM3 where excess peroxynitrite (ONOO–) yielded iron(II)-NO products rather than the anticipated
CpdI or CpdII products.[46] This is in contrast
to the work of Groves et al.,[47] who added
NO to oxygenated myoglobin to detect a ferryl-oxo species, i.e., CpdII,
and free NO2.[47] In particular,
the reaction of the iron(III)-superoxo species with NO was found to
yield peroxynitrite rapidly. The order by which dioxygen and NO are
added to the protein may have an effect on whether ferrous-nitrosyl,
CpdI or CpdII is formed, and therefore we decided to study the early
stages of the catalyticcycle of TxtE, and particularly focused on
the formation of the iron(II)-NO and ferric-peroxynitrite species.In this study we investigated the order of O2 and NO
binding in TxtE and whether free NO2• or NO2– is generated and is involved
in the catalytic mechanism of l-Trp nitration by P450 TxtE.
In addition, our work focused on understanding the selectivity of
substrate nitration and shows that an initial precursor iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplex homolytically cleaves into an iron(IV)-oxo heme and NO2•. As substrate, L-tryptophan is
located close to the formed NO2• and
it is activated rapidly to form nitrated products. Clearly, substrate
binding must be a precursor to NO addition to an iron(III)-superoxo
intermediate in the catalyticcycle. Our work rationalizes substrate
nitration by P450 isozymes and gives insights into how to further
engineer P450 enzymes for more efficient biotechnological applications.
Methods
Experiment
Sample Preparation
N-terminal His-tagged TxtE protein
was expressed and purified based on a previously described protocol.[22] For large-scale protein production 5 ×
1 L cultures were grown at 37 °C to an OD600 of ∼0.6
and induced overnight at 15 °C by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl
β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation and the pellet was resuspended in 100 mL buffer B1
(20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 1 mM
dithiothreitol (DTT) and 10% glycerol). The cells were lysed in the
presence of 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride using a French Press
(17 000 psi internal cell pressure) followed by sonication
for 2 min (Ultrasonic processor, Jencons). After removal of the cellular
debris by centrifugation (18 000g for 20 min
at 4 °C), the supernatant was applied to a 5 mL HiTrapTM HP affinity
column (Nickel Sepharose High Performance, GE Healthcare) equilibrated
with buffer B1 (flow rate 2 mL min–1). Unbound proteins
were removed by washing with 30 mL buffer B1 and the His6-TxtE fusion protein was eluted with ∼10 mL of buffer B2 (25
mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM imidazole, 1 mM DTT, 10%
glycerol). The protein was further purified by gel filtration using
110 mL Superdex 12 prep grade resin (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with
buffer B3 (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT and 10% glycerol).
The sample was eluted with ∼64 mL of buffer B3 (flow rate 0.75
mL min–1, column dead volume 40 mL), and fractions
containing His6-TxtE were analyzed by electrophoresis (10%
SDS-PAGE, Figure S1, Supporting Information),
pooled, and concentrated using an Amicon Ultracentrifugal filtration
device with a 30 000 molecular weight cutoff membrane (Millipore).
Pure His6-TxtE was buffer exchanged into buffer B4 (25
mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 30% glycerol), aliquoted and
frozen at −80 °C. The purified protein was confirmed to
be active using the previously described assay.[22] UV–vis absorbance spectra were measured using a
Cary 50 UV–vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies).
Stopped-Flow Spectroscopy
Rapid kinetic measurements
were carried out using an SX20 rapid mixing stopped-flow spectrophotometer
(Applied Photophysics Ltd., Leatherhead) placed inside a Belle Technology
anaerobicchamber (oxygen levels <2 ppm) as previously described.[48] Proteins and substrates were dissolved in buffer
(25 mM Tris, pH 8.0) and degassed, unless otherwise stated. L-Tryptophan (0.5 mM) and sodium dithionite (15 mM) were added to
TxtE protein (150 μM) to reduce it to the high-spiniron(II)
form. To remove excess dithionite, the protein was passed through
a PD10 desalting column equilibrated with 20 mM Tris pH 8 containing
0.15 mM l-Trp (which was kept in the glovebox overnight prior
to all measurements and to ensure removal of all oxygen traces) and
eluted in a volume of ∼5 mL. To confirm that the protein hemeiron was reduced and high-spin (l-Trp was bound), a sample
was analyzed by UV–vis spectroscopy in a sealed cuvette. The
protein was maintained in a reduced, high-spin state for several hours.
All stopped-flow experiments were carried out at 4 °C using a
final concentration of 2 μM TxtE and 75 μM l-Trp.
For NO experiments with degassed buffer, the sample was bubbled with
NO for 10 min to saturate the buffer. To ascertain that the NO did
not contain impurities such as small traces of NO2 that
could affect the results,[36,49−52] some experiments were repeated with purified NO that had first been
passed through a 10% (w/v) solution of Ascarite (Sigma-Aldrich) to
remove any potential impurities caused by disproportionation of the
NO gas from the cylinder. None of these studies gave significantly
different results from the experiments with nonpurified NO, see the Supporting Information, Figure S5.For
O2 experiments a sealed tube containing air-saturated buffer
(∼200 μM O2) was transferred to the anaerobicchamber. Serial dilutions of each solution were made just prior to
use by using degassed buffer as required. Time-resolved spectral changes
were recorded using a photodiode array detector, and single wavelength
kinetic transients were measured at 435 nm (for O2) or
445 nm (for NO) to determine the rates of gas binding. The rates of
NO and O2 binding were measured in single mixing stopped-flow
experiments (experimental set up shown schematically in Figure S2, Supporting Information) over a range
of concentrations. Double mixing stopped-flow experiments were carried
out to determine the order of gas binding to the protein (experimental
set up shown schematically in Figure S3, Supporting Information).The samples from the double mixing
stopped-flow experiments were
collected after each mix and frozen for further analysis by LC-HRMS.
LC-HRMS conditions for analysis of 4-l-nitrotryptophan production
were as follows: LC-HRMS was performed on a Sigma Ascentis Express
column (C18, 150 × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm) attached to a Dionex
3000RS UHPLCcoupled with a Bruker MaXis ESI-Q-TOF mass spectrometer.
The mobile phase A was watercontaining 0.1% formic acid and mobile
phase B was methanolcontaining 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was
set at 0.2 mL min–1, and the absorbance was measured
at 220 nm. The following elution profile was used: 0–5 min
−100% A; 5–17.4 min −100% A to 100% B; 17.4-
22.4 min −100% B; then equilibrate back to 100% A.The
mass spectrometer was operated in positive mode with a scan
range of 50–2000 m/z. The
source conditions were as follows: end plate offset at −500
V; capillary at −4500 V; nebulizer gas (N2) at 1.6
bar; dry gas (N2) at 8 L min–1; dry temperature
at 180 °C. Ion transfer conditions were as follows: ion funnel
RF at 200 Vpp; multiple RF at 200 Vpp; quadruple
low mass at 55 m/z; collision energy
at 5.0 eV; collision RF at 600 Vpp; ion cooler RF at 50–350
Vpp; transfer time was set to 121 μs; pre-Pulse storage
time was set to 1 μs. Calibration was carried out with sodium
formate (10 mM) through a loop injection of 20 μL of standard
solution at the beginning of each run.
Theory
Density
functional theory calculations were
performed on active site model complexes of TxtE based on the crystal
structure coordinates of the 4TPO protein data-bank (pdb) file.[24] We followed setup procedures as discussed and
described previously, but we will summarize the key facts here.[53,54] Our initial calculations used a minimal active site model (model A) that included an iron(III)-peroxynitrite-heme (with side
chains replaced by hydrogen atoms) and thiolate for the axial cysteinate
ligand. A complete tryptophan amino acid was included as substrate,
where the carboxylic acid group was deprotonated and the amino group
protonated. Hence, the overall charge of model A was
−1, and the system was calculated in the individual doublet
and quartet spin states. No constraints were put on this model.A second and more elaborate model (model B) was subsequently
studied that included the substrate binding pocket as obtained from
the 4TPO pdb
file with key hydrogen bonding interactions and salt bridges between
substrate and protein (Scheme ).[24] Thus, model B contains model A with one propionate side chain of
the heme included and was expanded with part of the substrate binding
pocket, namely the Arg59 and Tyr89 side chains,
the small peptide chains Asn293-Gln294-Phe295-Thr296-Trp297-Arg298,
and Glu394-Phe395, whereby the Gln294 residue was abbreviated to Gly. In the starting structure, the Trp
substrate in model B had a zwitterionic state with the
amino group protonated and the carboxylate group deprotonated and
forming a salt bridge with Arg59. This model has 250 atoms
and an overall charge of −1 and is shown in Scheme . To make sure that the structure
did not deviate too much from the crystal structure coordinates, some
geometricconstraints were placed on several α-carbon atoms
of the protein backbone in the model as identified with a star in Scheme . A comparison of
starting and final structures of the geometry optimizations showed
little changes of the protein part of the model and hence it kept
the features of the protein structure intact. In the following section
we will identify the model (A or B) after
the label of the structure.
Scheme 1
Computational Models Investigated
in This Work
Wavy lines show where a covalent
bond was broken.
Computational Models Investigated
in This Work
Wavy lines show where a covalent
bond was broken.For Model A,
a range of possible reaction pathways
for substrate nitration were explored using Gaussian 09,[55] see the Supporting Information. Using the obtained insight, we then investigated the low energy
pathways with the expanded cluster model B. Based on
our previous experience with heme systems, we used well-tested and
validated approaches that use density functional theory (DFT) methods.[56−58] All geometries were fully optimized without constraints, and transition
states were characterized with a single imaginary frequency for the
correct mode. For a number of transition state geometries, intrinsic
reaction coordinate scans were also performed that connected them
to the two local minima adjacent to the transition state (see the Supporting Information).The hybrid density
functional method UB3LYP[59,60] was used for all calculations
in combination with an LACVP basis
set on iron with core potential and 6-31G* on the rest of the atoms
(C, N, O, H, and S), basis set BS1.[61,62] All optimizations,
frequencies, and geometry scans included a conductor-like polarizable
continuum model (CPCM) with a dielectricconstant mimicking chlorobenzene.[63] To obtain more accurate energies, we did single-point
calculations with an LACV3P+ basis set on iron with electron core
potential and 6-311+G* on the rest of the atoms: basis set BS2. These
methods and approaches were used previously and shown to predict the
correct regio- and chemoselectivities of reaction mechanisms and to
give free energies of activation to within 3 kcal mol–1 of the experiment.[64−66]For a selection of small model complexes we
tested the effect of
an external electric field on the binding energy of NO2 to an indole group using the keyword “Field” as implemented
in Gaussian 09.[55]
Results
Stopped-Flow
Analyses
Stopped-flow spectroscopy experiments
were performed to determine the order of gas binding. The P450 catalyticcycle for a mono-oxygenation reaction starts with substrate binding
in the active site close to the iron(III)-heme in its resting state,
followed by release of water from the sixth ligand position of the
heme and resulting in conversion of iron from low spin (LS) to high
spin (HS). This is followed by a single electron reduction of the
heme from HS iron(III) to iron(II) using a redox partner, enabling
molecular oxygen binding to form the iron(III)-superoxo complex.[1−3,17−19,67,68] A further reduction
and two protonation steps result in the formation of Compound I (CpdI),
an iron(IV)-oxo heme cation radical species that is the active oxidant
in oxygen atom transfer reactions. Trp nitration by P450 TxtE is believed
to deviate from this mechanism and upon formation of the iron(III)-superoxo
species the enzyme reacts with NO to form an iron(III)-peroxynitrite
intermediate or alternatively gives a ferric-nitrosyl complex. Indeed,
in all systems studied to date nitrating P450 enzymes are found to
be linked to a nitric oxide synthase enzyme that provides NO for the
process by reacting l-Arg with O2 on the hemeiron.[22,24]In order to confirm the mechanism
for TxtE and the order of O2 and NO binding, we have used
stopped-flow rapid mixing measurements to determine the order of gas
binding to the protein. Initial stopped-flow measurements involved
mixing the TxtE enzyme against either NO (purified or unpurified)
or O2 and showed that characteristic transient iron(II)-NO
and iron(III)-superoxo species were formed in each case. Time-resolved
spectra, recorded using a photodiode array detector, showed that the
absorbance maximum of the heme-iron state transiently shifts from
approximately 410 to 425 nm upon binding of O2, and to
435 nm upon binding of NO (Figure a), similar to literature reports.[69,70] Identical spectral changes were observed when purified NO was used
in the measurements, suggesting that any effects from possible impurities
caused by disproportionation of the NO source were minimal (see Figure S5, Supporting Information).
Figure 2
Stopped-flow
analysis of the mechanism of gas binding in TxtE.
(a) Absorbance spectra measured after 50 ms using stopped-flow photodiode
array measurements upon mixing of TxtE iron(II) with either anaerobic
buffer, 20 μM O2, or 20 μM NO. (b) Dependence
of the rate constant for gas binding to iron(II) heme TxtE on the
concentration of either O2 or NO. The data were fitted
to a straight line to determine the 2nd order rate constant for O2 or NO binding. (c) Time-resolved spectra at selected time
points from double mixing stopped-flow experiments, where iron(II)
heme TxtE was first mixed with 20 μM O2, aged for
50 ms, and then mixed with 20 μM NO prior to data collection.
The iron(III)-superoxo species at 425 nm is rapidly converted to the
water-ligated iron(III) form at 417 nm over 100 ms. (d) Relative amounts
of the l-4-nitrotryptophan product formed in samples collected
from double mixing stopped-flow experiments, where iron(II) heme TxtE
was first mixed with either 20 μM O2 or 20 μM
NO, aged for 50 ms, and then mixed with 100 μM NO or O2, respectively. All raw data can be found in the Supporting Information.
Stopped-flow
analysis of the mechanism of gas binding in TxtE.
(a) Absorbance spectra measured after 50 ms using stopped-flow photodiode
array measurements upon mixing of TxtEiron(II) with either anaerobic
buffer, 20 μM O2, or 20 μM NO. (b) Dependence
of the rate constant for gas binding to iron(II) heme TxtE on the
concentration of either O2 or NO. The data were fitted
to a straight line to determine the 2nd order rate constant for O2 or NO binding. (c) Time-resolved spectra at selected time
points from double mixing stopped-flow experiments, where iron(II)hemeTxtE was first mixed with 20 μM O2, aged for
50 ms, and then mixed with 20 μM NO prior to data collection.
The iron(III)-superoxo species at 425 nm is rapidly converted to the
water-ligated iron(III) form at 417 nm over 100 ms. (d) Relative amounts
of the l-4-nitrotryptophan product formed in samples collected
from double mixing stopped-flow experiments, where iron(II) heme TxtE
was first mixed with either 20 μM O2 or 20 μM
NO, aged for 50 ms, and then mixed with 100 μM NO or O2, respectively. All raw data can be found in the Supporting Information.Previous studies on dioxygen binding to P450 enzymes also showed
a Soret band at 425 nm for the substrate-bound ferric-superoxo species,
in agreement with the TxtE data seen here.[71] Consequently, the rate of gas binding was measured at the wavelength
where the maximum increase in absorbance occurred: in our case we
measured the absorbance changes at 435 nm for O2 and at
445 nm for NO over a range of O2 and NO concentrations
(Figures S4 and S5 for purified NO, Supporting
Information) rather than at the Soret maximum absorbances. In each
case, the rate of binding was linearly dependent on the gas concentration,
yielding second order rate constants of 4.43 ± 0.03 × 106 M–1 s–1 for O2 binding and 1.82 ± 0.03 × 106 M–1 s–1 for NO binding (Figure b). Hence, the rate of binding of O2 is approximately 2.5 times faster than that for NO, implying that
O2 is most likely to bind to the enzyme prior to NO. Moreover,
this is likely to be particularly evident inside the cell where the
concentration of O2 would be expected to be much higher
than that of NO.Next, we attempted to isolate the putative
iron(III)-peroxynitrite
intermediate and to confirm the order of gas binding in TxtEthrough
a double mixing stopped-flow experiment. To this end, TxtE was first
mixed with O2 or NO, allowed to age for 50 ms to form the
initial iron(III)-superoxo or iron(II)-NO species, and then mixed
with the second gas prior to collection of the time-resolved spectral
changes. Measurements where TxtE was first mixed with NO, followed
by a second mix with O2, only appeared to show the formation
of the iron(II)-NO species at 435 nm on time scales faster than 1
s (Figure S8, Supporting Information).
On longer time scales (<100 s) the 435 nm peak slowly disappeared
and a new peak at 425 nm was formed, which is likely to represent
the iron(III)-superoxo species as the bound NO is gradually displaced
by O2 (Figure S8, Supporting
Information). Hence, it appears that O2 is unable to react
directly with the iron(II)-NO intermediate to form any new species,
suggesting that dioxygen must bind prior to NO in order to produce
a catalytically active species.The reverse experiments, involving
an initial mix with O2 followed by a second mix with NO,
were slightly more complicated
as the iron(III)-superoxo species decays over approximately 1 s, even
upon mixing with anaerobic buffer. It is converted to a new species
with an absorbance maximum at 417 nm, which represents the water-ligated
iron(III) form of the enzyme (Figure S9, Supporting Information). Nevertheless, clear differences are observed
upon binding of NO to the iron(III)-superoxo complex, implying that
binding of dioxygen prior to NO appears to give a more likely catalytic
intermediate than the reverse ordering. The iron(III)-superoxo species
is converted to the same water-ligated iron(III) species much more
rapidly (<100 ms) upon mixing with NO (Figures c and S10, Supporting
Information), presumably as a result of catalysis to form the l-4-nitrotryptophan product. On longer time scales (>4s)
the l-Trp substrate rebinds to this iron(III) to give rise
to starting
substrate-bound heme spectrum at 390 nm (Figure S8).Further confirmation of the binding order was provided
by additional
double mixing experiments, where equal concentrations of O2 and NO were initially mixed and allowed to age for 50 ms, prior
to mixing with the enzyme (Figure S9).
In this case, there was no observable formation of the iron(II)-NO
species at 435 nm. Instead, rapid formation of the iron(III)-superoxo
species was observed at 425 nm, followed by the rapid decay to the
water-ligated iron(III) species at 417 nm, in a similar manner to
the previous binding of NO to the iron(III)-superoxo complex. It was
not possible to identify any additional catalytic intermediates in
the double mixing photodiode array experiments, which implies that
the rate of formation of the proposed peroxynitrite species is likely
to be much slower than the subsequent reaction chemistry.Consequently,
in order to provide further evidence that the catalyticiron(III)-peroxynitrite intermediate is formed directly upon NO binding
to the iron(III)-superoxo species, we collected samples from the double
mixing stopped-flow experiments and measured the amount of l-4-nitrotryptophan product that had been formed (Figures d and S10, Supporting Information). Upon mixing of the iron(II)-NOcomplex with different concentrations of O2, only a small
amount of l-4-nitrotryptophan was formed, presumably because
the NO is gradually displaced by O2 prior to collecting
and freezing the samples from the stopped-flow instrument. However,
the amount of the L-4-nitrotryptophan product is significantly higher
when the iron(III)-superoxo species is mixed with NO (Figure d). Moreover, the amount of
product increases with the concentration of NO used in the second
mix (Figure S10, Supporting Information).
This indicates that efficient reaction chemistry only occurs when
O2 binds first to form the iron(III)-superoxo species,
followed by NO binding to generate the catalytically relevant iron(III)-peroxynitrite
intermediate. The experimentally derived catalyticcycle of P450 TxtE,
based on the stopped-flow experiments presented here, is shown in Scheme . The work shows
that both dioxygen and NO can bind to an iron(II) pentacoordinated
heme structure, although the dioxygen binds faster. Subsequently,
the iron(III)-superoxo species rapidly reacts with NO and one molecule
of substrate to form 4-nitro-L-tryptophan, and returns the
enzyme to the resting state. Unfortunately, the peroxynitritecomplex
was too short-lived to characterize and study in detail, and hence
a computational study was performed.
Scheme 2
Reaction Mechanism
of TxtE As Derived from Stopped-Flow Measurements
Computation
To gain further insight into the catalyticcycle of TxtE and related nitrating enzymes, we pursued a computational
study using model complexes based on the active site and substrate
binding environment of the enzyme. Our cluster model had 250 atoms
and is shown above in Scheme . Our initial focus was on the potential role of peroxynitrite
in the reaction mechanism, but the substrate activation reactions
were also investigated. As we propose free NO2 to be formed
during the catalyticcycle of TxtE, we decided to explore substrate
activation on the C4, C5, C6, and
C7-positions of l-Trp. In particular, the reaction
energy with zero-point energy (ZPE) correction (ΔE+ZPER) for the formation of iron(III)-peroxynitrite from
either iron(III)-superoxo + NO (eq ) or iron(II)-nitrosyl + O2 (eq ) was calculated. To this end, the
individual molecules in reactions and 2 were calculated with the
small model complex A in the absence of substrate and
the energy differences for these reactions are shown in Scheme .
Scheme 3
UB3LYP/BS2//UB3LYP/BS1+ZPE Calculated Mechanisms
for Iron(III)-Peroxynitrite
Formation
At the UB3LYP/BS2//UB3LYP/BS1+ZPE
level of theory, both are exothermic,
with values of −11.4 kcal mol–1 for reaction and −36.0
kcal mol–1 for reaction . Note that, with the large model complex,
the energy for reaction was calculated to be ΔE+ZPER =
−12.3 kcal mol–1; hence the protein environment
has little effect on the iron(III)-peroxynitrite bond formation.However, the reaction rates for the two processes give the opposite
ordering and a barrier height with magnitude ΔE‡+ZPE = 14.0 kcal mol–1 was calculated
for reaction , while reaction is estimated to
be well over 27 kcal mol–1 using gas-phase model
complexes. This reaction barrier is in good quantitative agreement
with calculations on a biomimeticiron-porphyrin model complex with
an axial imidazole group for an O-bound iron(III)-peroxynitrite dissociation
into an iron(IV)-oxo and NO2.[72] Furthermore, DFT calculations of large cluster models of heme-NO
and heme-O2 species showed that O2 binds more
strongly than NO.[73] It should be mentioned
here that the reaction of iron(III)-superoxo with NO gives an O-bound
iron(III)-peroxynitrite structure, whereas the reaction of iron(II)-NO
with O2 gives the less stable N-bound
iron(III)-peroxynitrite that is rapidly released from the ironcenter
and forms a pentacoordinated iron(II)-heme and a free peroxynitrite
ion. As such, the DFT calculations on small cluster models support
a faster reaction of iron(III)-superoxo with NO than iron(II)-NO with
O2. Moreover, they show that iron(II)-NO with dioxygen
does not give an iron(III)-peroxynitrite directly but instead a relatively
unstable N-bound iron(III)-peroxynitrite that either reacts to form
iron(III)-superoxo by NO release or reorients to form the O-bound
iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplex. The driving force for converting
the iron(II)-NO + O2 into an iron(III)-superoxo and a NO
molecule was calculated to be exothermic by 24.6 kcal mol–1.Next, we explored the reaction mechanism of substrate activation
in TxtE, leading to substrate nitration and hydroxylation as displayed
in Scheme . Initially,
the work focused on the steps from the iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplexes
in the doublet and quartet spin states, and we investigated three
major reaction pathways. These iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplexes (4,2Re) were geometry optimized with a large active
site model that includes the substrate and the binding pocket. Pathways
1 and 2 start with a homolytic O–O bond cleavage in the peroxynitrite
group to form Compound II, i.e. an iron(IV)-oxo heme and NO2 (complex Int1) via a transition state TS1. Thereafter, pathways 1 and 2 diverge and substrate attack of either
NO2 or iron(IV)-oxo were investigated. In pathway 1, the
free NO2 radical attacks the substrate directly to form
intermediate Int4 via transition state TS4, which after hydrogen atom transfer to the iron(IV)-oxo species
via transition state TS5 leads to nitrated Trp and the
ferric-hydroxidecomplex, i.e., protonated Compound II (Int5).
Scheme 4
Mechanistic Pathways Explored for the Reaction of Iron(III)-Peroxynitrite
with l-Trp on the C4-Position Using DFT Methods
In pathway 2, by contrast, an electrophilic
addition of the oxo
to a carbon atom of the Trp substrate takes place to form a radical
intermediate Int2 via a transition state TS2. This is then followed by abstraction of the ipso-proton from the Trpcarbon atom by the heme to form the protonated
heme structure Int3 via transition state TS3. A proton reshuttle leads to phenol products (Int6)
or alternatively the NO2 radical attacks the ipso-position to form nitrated Trp products (Int5).For the small model complex, a small barrier of ΔE‡+ZPE = 12.2 kcal mol–1 for peroxynitrite
dissociation into CpdII and NO2 was
found via 2TS1A. Much larger barriers
are found for the next steps in the mechanism, namely for the attack
of NO2 on the substrate (via 2TS4A) or the oxo attack on the substrate (via 2TS2A). With the small model complex, we find
pathway 1 is favored over pathway 2, whereby 2TS2A is calculated to be higher in energy than 2TS4A by at least 4 kcal mol–1 (Tables S4 and S6, Supporting Information).
Subsequently, the full mechanism was calculated for nitration at the
C4-, C5-, C6-, and C7-positions
of l-Trp using the large model B. Furthermore,
as substrate is bound in the substrate binding pocket with different
residues on both sides, we considered attacks on either side of the
aromatic ring, which are designated as the endo-
and exo-pathways. In addition, to these two pathways,
we also tested a direct attack of heme-bound peroxynitrite onto these
carbon-positions of l-Trp to form intermediate Int4 using model A. However, this pathway (pathway 3; Figure S20, Supporting Information) is very high
in energy and did not lead to NO2 transfer to substrate,
but instead the peroxynitrite structure stayed intact. As such, peroxynitrite
will need to be activated first and split into NO2 and
an iron(IV)-oxo species in order to be reactive. Consequently, pathway
3 was ruled out for further studies. We also attempted a reaction
where NO2 attacks the substrate in structure 2,4Int2A to form either Int4A or Int5A directly. However, no viable
low energy pathways were found either.Subsequently, we focused
on the large model structure (model B), and calculated
the full reaction landscape starting from
a peroxynitrite bound structure. The potential energy landscape for
the reaction of the iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplex with l-Trp on the lowest energy doublet and quartet spin states for pathway
1 for attack on the C4-exo position are
given in Figure .
The reactant states (ReB) of the heme active
site with substrate bound are in a doublet spin ground state as expected
for iron(III)complexes, while the quartet spin state is ΔG = 3.6 kcal mol–1 higher in free energy.
There is a small barrier of ΔG‡ = 3.3 kcal mol–1 via 2TS1B for homolytic O–O cleavage to form iron(IV)-oxo
and an NO2• radical. The quartet spin
barrier is much higher in energy, i.e., ΔG‡ = 14.5 kcal mol–1, and therefore
the first reaction step will take place on a dominant doublet spin
state surface.
Figure 3
Potential energy landscape (with values in kcal mol–1) of l-Trp nitration at the C4-position via exo-attack in an active site model
complex B. All geometries optimized in Gaussian at UB3LYP/BS1.
The two energetic
values represent ΔE+ZPE (ΔG) data with energies obtained using basis set BS2 and with ZPE and
solvent corrections; free energies are given in parentheses at 298
K and contain ZPE, thermal, solvent and entropic corrections. Optimized
geometries of the transition states give bond lengths in angstroms
and the imaginary frequency in cm–1.
Potential energy landscape (with values in kcal mol–1) of l-Trp nitration at the C4-position via exo-attack in an active site model
complex B. All geometries optimized in Gaussian at UB3LYP/BS1.
The two energetic
values represent ΔE+ZPE (ΔG) data with energies obtained using basis set BS2 and with ZPE and
solvent corrections; free energies are given in parentheses at 298
K and contain ZPE, thermal, solvent and entropiccorrections. Optimized
geometries of the transition states give bond lengths in angstroms
and the imaginary frequency in cm–1.The peroxynitrite-cleaving transition state geometries have
substantially
elongated O–O distances of 1.902 (1.766) Å for 2TS1B (4TS1B) and visualization of the imaginary frequency shows an O–O
bond cleavage mode. The first reaction step is virtually thermoneutral
on the doublet spin state and brings the quartet spin state to within
a fraction of a kcal mol–1. This is not surprising
as, electronically,[4,2]Int1B can
be characterized as an iron(IV)-oxo hemecomplex, i.e. Compound II
(CpdII), with an NO2 radical in close proximity. Indeed
the group spin densities (Supporting Information) of 4,2Int1B show a full spin
on the NO2 group. The molecular valence orbitals of 4,2Int1B (shown in Figure S29, Supporting Information) confirm that CpdII has
an electronicconfiguration with two unpaired electrons in π*
orbitals (π* and π*) for the antibonding interaction of a 3d
iron orbital with a 2p on the oxo group. The π* orbital mixes somewhat with a π*NO2 orbital and hence there is a small but weak long-range interaction
between CpdII and NO2. The heme-based a2u orbital
is doubly occupied in CpdII, in contrast to CpdI where it is singly
occupied. Thus, the two unpaired electrons in π* and π* are
ferromagnetically coupled to the NO2• radical (in orbital π*NO2) into an overall quartet
spin state or antiferromagnetically coupled into an overall doublet
spin state. As such, there are two different spin-configurations for
the CpdII structure with overall doublet and quartet spin. These two
configurations are close in energy and indeed we find them within
1 kcal mol–1.In previous work on P450 reactivity
by Compound I (CpdI), i.e.,
the iron(IV)-hemecation radical species which is the one electron
oxidized form of CpdII, it was found to also have close lying doublet
and quartet spin state structures, but with π*1 π*1 a2u1 configuration.[74−76] Thus, reaction
mechanisms with substrates were shown to proceed on competing spin-state
surfaces with competing rate-constants. Moreover, examples have been
highlighted in the past, where product distributions were different
on each of the spin-state surfaces.[77,78] Therefore,
we calculated the full mechanism of l-Trp nitration on the
doublet and quartet spin states for all reactions.We attempted
to optimize the geometry of the product from heterolyticcleavage of peroxynitrite to give either 4,2CpdI + NO2– or an iron(III)-oxo(heme) + NO2+. However, in both cases when we swapped molecular orbitals
in 4,2Int1B, the SCFconverged
back to the original conformation. Therefore, the heterolyticcleavage
pathways are high in energy and are unlikely scenarios for the TxtE
and can be ruled out. As such we do not expect either NO2+ or NO2– to be involved
in the substrate nitration reaction mechanism.Subsequently,
we investigated the addition of NO2 to l-Trp substrate
from the 2,4Int1B structures and,
as an example, we show the calculated mechanism
for activation of the C4-exo-position
of l-Trp by CpdII in Figure . The C–N bond formation transition states take
place via barriers 2,4TS4B,C4-. On both the doublet and quartet spin state surfaces,
small barriers that are within ΔG‡ = 1 kcal mol–1 of 4,2Int1B are found. Nevertheless, both transition states were
characterized as shown in Figure with a single imaginary frequency of i178/i179 cm–1 representing a C–NO2 vibrational
stretch. As the transition states represent NO2 transfer
to l-Trp and no electron is transferred to CpdII, there are
little changes to the geometry of the CpdII part as compared between 2,4Int1B and 2,4TS4B,C4-, and geometrically those
parts of the structure are the same.The transition state is
a pure NO2• attack on the aromatic ring
of l-Trp and no electron transfer
to the heme takes place. The shallow intermediate (4,2Int4B,C4-exo) is followed by another low-energy
barrier, namely the hydrogen atom transfer from l-Trp to
CpdII, which could not be characterized for the C4-exo
pathway and hence will proceed very quickly. As such, these reactions
will be fast and efficient, and it is unlikely that NO2• will drift out of the substrate binding pocket
if substrate is present. Obviously, it is important that NO2• does not drift out of the protein pocket as it
is known to activate aromatic amino acids and could react with enzymatic
residues if the substrate is not positioned appropriately.[35] In particular, the substrate binding pocket
of the 4TPO PDB
file[24] is lined with several aromatic residues,
e.g., Phe79, Trp82, Tyr89, Trp297, and Phe395. Clearly, peroxynitrite activation
and the production of NO2 should not lead to nitration
of any of these active site residues. Therefore, NO2 should
be used by the protein as soon as it is formed and, based on the low
barriers found here, they clearly implicate a rapid substrate activation.As our proposed mechanism of l-Trp nitration by P450 enzymes
suggests the formation of a free NO2 radical after homolyticcleavage of peroxynitrite, we decided to explore pathways leading
to C4-, C5-, C6-, and C7-nitration for model B, and the results are summarized
in Table . Of course,
these mechanisms have two stereochemical isomers, which are designated
as the exo- and endo-pathways. Optimized
geometries of all 2,4TS4B transition
states are given in the Figure S25 (Supporting
Information), while the one for C4-exo is given above in Figure . As this reaction step proceeds away from the hemecenter
and no electron transfer takes place, it means that the hemeCpdII
distances, i.e. the Fe–O and Fe–S interactions, are
very close for all structures. A little more variation is seen in
the C–N bond that is being formed in the transition state.
The shortest distances are found for C5-activation whereby
the endo-pathway gives the shortest distances of
1.714 Å, while those for the exo-pathway are
1.721 Å. By contrast, much longer C–N distances are found
for the C7-activation with values of 1.830/1.831 Å
for 2TS4B,C7-/4TS4B,C7- and 1.827/1.842 Å for 2TS4B,C7-/4TS4B,C7-.
Table 1
Relative
Energies of NO2 Transfer to Various Positions of the l-Trp Substratea
pathway
2TS4B (4TS4B)
2Int4B (4Int4B)
2TS5B (4TS5B)
2Int5B (4Int5B)
C4-exo
>0.0 (>0.0)
–3.5 (−3.5)
>-3.0 (>-3.0)
–58.0 (−23.2)
C4-endo
6.6 (>0.0)
6.4 (−1.4)
11.0 (15.0)
–49.2 (−14.9)
C5-exo
0.9 (0.9)
–0.6 (0.0)
16.9 (17.9)
–49.6 (−15.8)
C5-endo
>3.0 (>0.0)
2.7 (−4.2)
8.3 (10.3)
–57.7 (−23.6)
C6-exo
0.6 (>0.0)
0.3 (−0.4)
6.1 (6.6)
–40.8 (−46.9)
C6-endo
3.2 (2.2)
0.2 (1.1)
6.4 (6.1)
–45.9 (−40.8)
C7-exo
2.4 (2.4)
0.2 (0.2)
2.7 (4.5)
–60.9 (−56.1)
C7-endo
>0.0 (>0.0)
–1.6 (−1.5)
1.8 (3.8)
–56.9 (−27.2)
Values in kcal
mol–1 represent ΔE+ZPE data
with energies obtained
at UB3LYP/BS2//UB3LYP/BS1 relative to 2ReB.
Values in kcal
mol–1 represent ΔE+ZPE data
with energies obtained
at UB3LYP/BS2//UB3LYP/BS1 relative to 2ReB.Next, we looked
at the energetics for NO2 transfer to
the C4-, C5-, C6-, and C7-positions of the l-Trp substrate through attack from the
exo and endo directions. We located C–N bond formation transition
states (2,4TS4B) and the subsequent
local minima (2,4Int4B), as well
as the ipso-hydrogen atom abstraction transition
state (2,4TS5B) by CpdII leading
to the nitrated product complexes. 2,4Int5B and the energies with respect to 2ReB for all pathways are given in Table . Several barriers for C–N bond formation
via TS4B are very low in energy and could
not be located precisely, but geometry scans find them to be less
than 1 kcal mol–1 above the Int1B intermediate. These pathways should lead to addition of NO2 to l-Trp at the C4-exo, C4-endo, C5-endo, C6-exo, and C7-endo positions. As a matter of fact, most TS4B barriers are found within a small window of 4 kcal mol–1 and only doublet spinC4-endo is higher
in energy, i.e. its transition state is about 7 kcal mol–1 above 2Int1B.The NO2 addition local minimum (2,4Int4B) is followed by hydrogen abstraction from
the ipso-position by CpdII to form nitrated Trp and
ferric-hydroxide. Due to the position of the substrate in the binding
pocket, in several cases substantial hydrogen abstraction barriers
are found. Thus, the C6- and C7-positions of l-Trp are pointing toward the iron(IV)-oxo group of the heme
and hence, when NO2 attacks the substrate at these positions,
their hydrogen atoms can easily be abstracted by CpdII. Indeed, TS5B barriers for C6- and C7-nitration of less than 7 kcal mol–1, with respect
to isolated reactants, are those mostly found. By contrast, the C5-exo position points away from the heme and
consequently hydrogen atom transfer is difficult and high barriers
are obtained as a result of major structural rearrangements.Finally, we investigated the possible aromatic hydroxylation reaction
of P450 TxtE (bottom-right pathway in Scheme ). As shown before, the aromatic hydroxylation
by a metal(IV)-oxo species starts with an electrophilic addition of
the oxo to the aromatic ring, followed by proton shuttle from the
aromaticipso-position to a nearby proton acceptor
group, such as the nitrogen atoms of the porphyrin ring, prior to
relay of the proton to the oxygen atom to form hydroxylated product.[79−81] This mechanism, i.e., pathway 2 in Scheme , was found to be high in energy for the
quartet spin state (ΔE‡+ZPE
> 30 kcal mol–1 for 4TS2A and 4TS3A) and, although
somewhat lower on the doublet spin state surface (>25 kcal mol–1), is still much higher in energy than the NO2 transfer step to the substrate. Therefore, substrate hydroxylation
will not be a feasible pathway in the presence of free NO2 radicals. This is in agreement with experimental work on P450 TxtE
that failed to identify hydroxylated l-Trp products.An alternative to the electrophilic aromatic hydroxylation, that
started with a hydrogen atom abstraction from the substrate by the
iron(IV)-oxo species in Int2, was also investigated.
In particular, the hydrogen atom abstraction from the C6 position was explored for the large model system. However, high
energy hydrogen atom abstraction free energies of activation of ΔG‡ = 23.5 kcal mol–1 and 22.8 kcal mol–1 for doublet and quartet, respectively,
were obtained (Supporting Information,
Figure S27). Therefore, a direct hydrogen atom abstraction from the
aromatic ring of l-Trpcan be ruled out as a viable mechanism
as expected given the high C–H bond strength.Overall,
the work shows that the aromatic nitration by P450 TxtE
is triggered by a reaction of NO with an iron(III)-superoxo species
to form iron(III)-peroxynitrite that releases NO2• rapidly. These NO2• radicals react
with the indole ring of l-Trpthrough addition and the nearby
CpdII species abstracts the ipso-hydrogen atom to
form the 4-nitrotryptophan products. However, as free NO2• is formed, this means regioselectivity is determined
by the tightness of substrate binding and the orientation of Trp in
the substrate binding pocket. How this selectivity is determined,
we discuss in further detail below.
Discussion
In
this work a combined experimental and computational study on
the P450 aromatic nitration enzyme TxtE is reported. These studies
focus on the catalytic reaction mechanism and the nature of the selectivity
of the reaction. Overall, our studies show that the mechanism is distinctly
different from conventional P450 mono-oxygenases, where an active
species (Compound I, CpdI) is initially formed and subsequently reacts
with substrates.1–5 To explain the differences in
the catalytic reaction cycle of P450 TxtE and P450 mono-oxygenases
in general, we compare the two reaction mechanisms side-by-side in Scheme . Both catalyticcycles start from an iron(III)-hemecomplex that is linked to the
protein through a thiolate bridge with a cysteinate residue. The sixth
coordination site of the iron(III) is occupied by a water molecule
in the resting state (structure A in Scheme ). Upon substrate binding the
water molecule is released and the metalcomplex undergoes a spin-state
change from low-spin to high-spin. DFT calculations showed that the
high-spin is preferred over the low-spin in the 5-coordinate iron(III)complex, whereas the spin-state ordering is reversed in 6-coordinate
environments.[82] Thereafter, the complex
is reduced by the redox partner and binds molecular oxygen (complex B in Scheme ). Beyond complex B, the catalyticcycles of P450 mono-oxygenases
and P450 nitration enzymes diverge. Thus, the mono-oxygenases reduce
structure B and after two proton transfer steps generate
a high-valent iron(IV)-oxo heme cation radical species called CpdI.
The P450 TxtE isozymes, by contrast, bind a molecule of NO that reacts
with the iron(III)-superoxo intermediate (B) to form
an iron(III)-peroxynitrite intermediate.
Scheme 5
Comparative Catalytic
Cycles of P450 Nitration and P450 Mono-Oxygenase
Enzymes
As discussed above, several
pathways for nitration of l-Trp substrate were calculated
here and our lowest energy mechanism
involves a reaction that starts with the iron(III)-peroxynitrite splitting
into Compound II (CpdII), i.e., iron(IV)-oxo heme and NO2• radical. The latter then attacks the substrate
at the C4-position and the ipso-hydrogen
atom at C4 moves to CpdII to generate an iron(III)-hydroxocomplex. A proton transfer from the protein or solvent then brings
the catalyticcycle back into the resting state. At this stage it
is not clear whether this proton transfer step happens prior to, or
after, product release.The catalyticcycles of P450 nitration
and mono-oxy-genation in Scheme show dramatic differences.
Thus, P450 TxtE would require only a single electron from a redox
partner and no proton transfer to generate an iron(III)-peroxynitrite
as the active species, whereas P450 mono-oxygenases need two electrons
and two external protons to form CpdI. However, one proton transfer
is needed in P450 TxtE to convert protonated CpdII back to the resting
state. To understand these differences in proton relay mechanisms
during the catalyticcycle of P450 TxtE and general P450 mono-oxygenases,
we analyzed structures of representative nitration and mono-oxygenase
enzymes (Figure ).
In particular, Figure displays an extract of the active site structures of P450 TxtE (4TPO PDB as a representative
of a nitrating P450)[24] and P450 CAM (3WRH PDB as a mono-oxygenase
P450 structure).[83,84]
Figure 4
Extracts of the crystal structure coordinates
of P450 TxtE (left)
and P450 CAM (right) as taken from the 4TPO and 3WRH PDB files. Amino acids are labeled as
in the PDB files.
Extracts of the crystal structure coordinates
of P450 TxtE (left)
and P450 CAM (right) as taken from the 4TPO and 3WRH PDB files. Amino acids are labeled as
in the PDB files.P450 CAM hydroxylates
camphor regio- and stereoselectively at the
C4-position and its mechanism has been extensively studied
with experimental and computational methods.[85−88] As rationalized and discussed
previously,[73,87] P450 CAM has a number of active
site residues involved in proton-relay during the catalyticcycle.
First, a buried Glu366 residue is connected via a chain
of water molecules to the alcohol group of Thr252 that
is located just above the heme. The Glu366 residue is believed
to deliver the first proton in the catalyticcycle of P450 mono-oxygenases,[89] whileAsp251 delivers the second
one. The Asp251 residue points out of the active site,
but computational modeling showed that a rotation of the side chain
brings the carboxylate group close to the Thr252alcohol
group, and thus Asp251can deliver a second proton into
the substrate binding pocket to complete the formation of CpdI.An analysis of the TxtE structure of 4TPO shows that the Glu366 residue is missing and is replaced by a Gln residue. Nevertheless,
the Gln environment is similar to that of Glu366 in P450
CAM, namely at the end of a cavity surrounded by apolar residues,
such as Leu and Ile. Interestingly, Val253 is not seen
in P450 TxtE and is replaced by another Thr residue (Thr251). Nevertheless, it is clear from the TxtE structure that one proton
source is lacking in the active site. Therefore, proton transfer in
P450 TxtE will be considerably slower than in P450 CAM, where one
proton may already be stored on the Glu366 residue prior
to the start of the catalyticcycle, and which should lead to efficient
protonation of the iron(II)-peroxo to form an iron(III)-hydroperoxocomplex.In P450 CAM the second proton in the catalyticcycle
is proposed
to be delivered through the rotation of Asp251. In the
TxtE structure, however, this Asp residue is missing and a proline
residue takes its position. Therefore, the proton transfer residues
in P450 TxtE have been mutated with respect to typical mono-oxygenase
structures, and consequently proton transfer into the active site
for the conversion of the iron(III)-superoxo species into CpdI is
hampered. This should give the iron(III)-superoxo species a relatively
long lifetime until NO is delivered and can form a heme-peroxynitritecomplex.The electron transfer processes that happen in the
reaction of
the iron(III)-superoxo species with NO to form NO2 via
a peroxynitrite intermediate are given in Figure as a valence bond (VB) diagram. VB schemes
have been extensively used to explain electron transfer processes
in reaction mechanisms and, in particular, were found to be useful
to explain regio- and chemoselectivities of reaction processes and
make predictions on what bonds are most likely activated in a substrate.[90−93] These VB structures give a bond orbital occupied by two electrons
as a line separated by two dots, while individual (unpaired) electrons
are given as dots. Thus, the isolated iron(III)-superoxo structure
has an open-shell singlet ground state with orbital occupation δx2–y22 3d2 π2 π*1 πOO,yz2 π*OO,yz0 πOO,xz2 π*OO,xz1.[76] The πOO and π*OO orbitals
represent the bonding and antibonding orbitals along the superoxo
bond in the xz and yz planes. The metal-type orbitals contain the
doubly occupied δx2-y2 orbital, which is a
nonbonding orbital in the plane of the heme with lobes pointing toward
the meso-carbon atoms. Then there are three electrons along the Fe–O
bond in π(2) and π*(1) for the bonding and antibonding interaction
of the metal 3d with a 2p on oxygen. This interaction is described as a two-center-three-electron
bond between the Fe and O atoms in Figure . In the xz plane the 3d iron orbital is not involved in interactions with any of the
oxygen atoms as the peroxo group is in that plane so, in contrast
to CpdII, it is a doubly occupied atomic orbital in the iron(III)-superoxo
form: 3d2. The approaching
NO molecule has one unpaired electron on the nitrogen atom. Upon attack
of the NO on the superoxo radical an N–O bond is formed by
the pairing up of the π*OO,xz and πN radicals to form the peroxynitrite πNO bond with
two electrons. At the same time, the two electrons from the πOO,yz orbital in the iron(III)-superoxo structure become the
lone-pair electrons on bridging oxygen of the peroxynitrite group:
lpO. This then generates the iron(III)-peroxynitrite intermediate,
i.e., the reactant complex Re in Figure and Scheme , with orbital configuration δx2–y22 3d2 π2 π*1 πOO,xz2 π*OO,xz0 πNO2lpO2. Consequently, the bonding and antibonding type electrons
involved in the superoxo bond in the iron(III)-superoxo species are
redistributed over the chemical system and a single bond remains between
the two oxygen atoms, i.e., dioxygenconfiguration πOO,xz2 π*OO,xz1.
Figure 5
Valence bond scheme for
the electron migrations during the conversion
of the ferric-superoxo and NO into CpdII and NO2 via a
peroxynitrite intermediate.
Valence bond scheme for
the electron migrations during the conversion
of the ferric-superoxo and NO into CpdII and NO2 via a
peroxynitrite intermediate.Next, the O–O bond breaks homolytically to form NO2 and a CpdII fragment by moving one electron from the πOO,xz orbital in 2Re into the Fe–O
bond. This electron pairs up with the two electrons of the 3d orbital on the iron to form the new two-center
three-electron bond with π2 π*1 configuration.
CpdII is in a triplet spin ground state,[91] with π*1 π*1 configuration that is either
antiferromagnetically coupled to a radical on NO2 in a
doublet spin state or ferromagnetically coupled into a quartet spin
state. Indeed, 4,2Int1 are close in energy,
while in 4,2Re the doublet and quartet spin
states are well separated. The calculations reported in this work
show that a reaction of iron(III)-superoxo with NO rapidly forms iron(III)-peroxynitritecomplexes. Moreover, the subsequent reaction for homolyticcleavage
of peroxynitrite to form NO2 and CpdII has a calculated
barrier of only ΔG‡ = 3.3
kcal mol–1 and hence should proceed rapidly. These
results are consistent with recent work of the Moënne-Loccoz
and Karlin and their co-workers on a biomimetic nonhemeCu(II)-peroxynitritecomplex that was found to homolytically cleave into NO2 and a copper(II)-oxo species.[72,94]As shown in this
work, homolyticcleavage of peroxynitrite gives
CpdII and free NO2, which can add to the π-system
of the substrate. To find out if a bare indole group in the gas-phase
would have a preference for nitration of a specificcarbon site in l-Trp, we calculated the C–N bond formation energy by
addition of NO2• to methylindole, see Figure . As can be seen
in all cases, the addition of NO2• to
methylindole is endothermic by 10.5–15.3 kcal mol–1 in the gas-phase with a preference for addition at the C4-position. As such, if all carbon atoms of l-Trp are accessible
in the protein then a reaction with NO2 should give a dominant
C4-nitration. Indeed experimental studies on l-Trp activation by P450 TxtE have confirmed that this is the only
detectable product.[22−24,32] The results of the
calculations reported in Table above show that the lowest NO2 addition barrier
is for the C4-exo pathway. However, the
table shows several alternative pathways to C5-, C6-, and C7-nitration to be close in energy. Hence,
a mixture of products is expected in an open substrate binding pocket.
Consequently, a tight binding of substrate and oxidant that brings
NO2• and the target position of substrate
close is essential for P450 TxtE.
Figure 6
(a) UB3LYP/6-31G* calculated C–N
bond formation energies
in a bare methylindole molecule. Values are ΔE+ZPE data in kcal mol–1. (b) Electric field effect
(with Efield in units of 0.001 au) on the relative energies
of NO2 addition to methylimidazole along the z-axis.
(a) UB3LYP/6-31G* calculated C–N
bond formation energies
in a bare methylindole molecule. Values are ΔE+ZPE data in kcal mol–1. (b) Electric field effect
(with Efield in units of 0.001 au) on the relative energies
of NO2 addition to methylimidazole along the z-axis.Interestingly, the addition of
NO2 to the aromatic ring
of methylindole is endothermic by well over 10 kcal mol–1, whereas the same step in the large enzymatic structure is almost
thermoneutral as seen by the energy differences for model B of Int1 and Int4 in Figure . By contrast, for the small model complex
without the protein environment (model A) an energy of
ΔE+ZPE = 19.4 (doublet) or 18.6 (quartet) kcal
mol–1 is obtained for the same reaction step. Therefore,
the protein environment stabilizes complex Int4 dramatically
and enables a favorable substrate nitration reaction with low barriers.To find out how the long-range interactions stabilize the NO2 adduct Int4 we took the methylindole structures
and calculated their energies through the addition of an external
electric field.[95,96] Electric fields were applied
to the molecular x-, y-, and z-axes, whereby the y-axis is along the C–NO2 bond that is
being formed and the z-axis along the C–ipso-H coordinate as shown on the top-right in Figure . These applied electric
fields are of a magnitude similar to those used in vibrational Stark
effect spectroscopy measurements on enzymatic systems and hence mimic
realistic perturbations.[97] With a field
along the x- and y-axis small energy changes are
seen, but along the z-axis these changes are major
(see Figure b). Therefore,
the barrier height of the reaction is linked with the movement of
the C–H bond from in-plane with respect to the Trp group to
make space for the in-coming nitro group. Thus, an applied electrical
field along the z-axis stabilizes the NO2 adduct with methylindole dramatically and changes the reaction energy
for adduct formation from endothermic by 10 kcal mol–1 to exothermic by 10 kcal mol–1. Particularly,
the C4-addition pathway is stabilized with an electric
field effect along the z-axis and enhances the selectivity
of the reaction. As a consequence, the protein is able to stabilize
and drive an otherwise unfavorable reaction through an induced polarized
environment. The substrate binding pocket has many polar residues,
e.g. Arg59 and Glu394 that bind the carboxylate
and ammonium groups of the substrate.[24] In addition, the side chains of the polar residues Met88, Tyr89, Met173 and Asn293 contact
the indole group of the Trp substrate and through electrostatic and
induced dipole moment interactions may affect the selectivity of the
reaction, but this will need to be confirmed by future mutation studies.
Conclusions
In this work a combined experimental and computational study is
presented for the possible reaction mechanisms of aromatic nitration
by a P450 isozyme. Using stopped-flow kinetics, we show that dioxygen
binds first to the hemeiron followed by NO to generate an iron(III)-peroxynitrite
species. We set up several active site model complexes with bound l-Trp and investigated substrate activation pathways leading
to nitration as well as to oxidation of the substrate. We found low-energy
barriers for the homolyticcleavage of iron(III)-peroxynitrite into
NO2 and CpdII. Consequently, the reaction of NO and O2 on an iron(III)-hemecenter is expected to generate free
NO2 radicals efficiently. We then explored NO2 attack on l-Trp and found pathways for activation at the
C4, C5, C6 and C7-positions.
Although NO2 addition is generally a low-energy process,
many pathways encounter relatively high energy hydrogen atom transfer
steps to form products. As such, substrate positioning and binding
must be essential in P450 TxtE as indeed is observed experimentally,[26] where a point mutation in a dynamic loop forming
the active site lid caused a complete switch of nitration regiochemistry
from C4 to C5.
Authors: Sarah M Barry; Johan A Kers; Evan G Johnson; Lijiang Song; Philip R Aston; Bhumit Patel; Stuart B Krasnoff; Brian R Crane; Donna M Gibson; Rosemary Loria; Gregory L Challis Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Hirotoshi Matsumura; Abayomi S Faponle; Peter-Leon Hagedoorn; Takehiko Tosha; Sam P de Visser; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz Journal: J Inorg Biochem Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 4.155
Authors: Christopher P Martin; Manyun Chen; Maria F Martinez; Yousong Ding; Jonathan D Caranto Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 3.162