Literature DB >> 3277994

Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens.

R C Tilton1, F N Judson, R C Barnes, R P Gruninger, R W Ryan, O Steingrimsson.   

Abstract

Four hundred and seventy-three men and women at high risk for sexually transmitted disease were tested for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urethra or the endocervix. Four groups were involved in this multicenter study of two direct fluorescent-antibody microscopy tests, Kallestad Pathfinder and Syva Microtrak, compared with culture techniques. Results from the test sites indicated that there was no significant difference overall in the sensitivity and specificity of the two test kits. However, there was some interlaboratory variation seen in the sensitivity of the microscopy, but little difference in the specificity. Either kit could be an effective screening method for C. trachomatis in high-risk populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277994      PMCID: PMC266244          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.167-170.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Assessment of neonatal conjunctivitis with a direct immunofluorescent monoclonal antibody stain for Chlamydia.

Authors:  P A Rapoza; T C Quinn; L A Kiessling; W R Green; H R Taylor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.

Authors:  E S Lipkin; J V Moncada; M A Shafer; T E Wilson; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis.

Authors:  M R Hammerschlag; J E Herrmann; P Cox; M Worku; R Laux; L V Howard
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Culture-independent diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  M R Tam; W E Stamm; H H Handsfield; R Stephens; C C Kuo; K K Holmes; K Ditzenberger; M Krieger; R C Nowinski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Rapid diagnosis of chlamydial infections with the MicroTrak direct test.

Authors:  C T Uyeda; P Welborn; N Ellison-Birang; K Shunk; B Tsaouse
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the direct fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  K H Tjiam; R V van Eijk; B Y van Heijst; G J Tideman; T van Joost; E Stolz; M F Michel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis pneumonia in infants.

Authors:  B Friis; C C Kuo; S P Wang; C H Mordhorst; J T Grayston
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1984-06

8.  Vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in sexually abused prepurbertal girls.

Authors:  C D Fuster; L S Neinstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Microtrak direct specimen test.

Authors:  P E Coudron; D P Fedorko; M S Dawson; L G Kaplowitz; R R Brookman; H P Dalton; B A Davis
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  14 in total

1.  Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  W LeBar; B Herschman; C Jemal; J Pierzchala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in a Turkish population.

Authors:  E Ertem; D Dereli; D Serter; K Yüce
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-08

4.  Diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection in a clinical setting by a direct antigen detection enzyme immunoassay kit.

Authors:  A Dascal; J Chan-Thim; M Morahan; J Portnoy; J Mendelson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sample.

Authors:  I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Improved Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia trachomatis direct test method.

Authors:  B A Judson; P P Lambert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in ocular and nasopharyngeal specimens from infants.

Authors:  P M Roblin; M R Hammerschlag; C Cummings; T H Williams; M Worku
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections by cell culture and the polymerase chain reaction using a closed system.

Authors:  L Ostergaard; J Traulsen; S Birkelund; G Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  B J Dille; C C Butzen; L G Birkenmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.