Literature DB >> 3510051

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Microtrak direct specimen test.

P E Coudron, D P Fedorko, M S Dawson, L G Kaplowitz, R R Brookman, H P Dalton, B A Davis.   

Abstract

The conventional cell culture method for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis requires two to six days and is technically difficult to perform. The authors evaluated a new, relatively simple, non-culture method (MicroTrak, Syva Co., Palo Alto, CA) that requires less than one hour to complete. Two hundred fifty-one cervical and 209 male urethral specimens from three Richmond health clinics were read by direct immunofluorescence staining and compared with cell culture technics using iodine staining. Patient specimens were applied directly onto microscope slides (8 mm well) and stained with a fluorescein-labeled monoclonal antibody. Slides were examined for 10-15 minutes at X1,000 using an AO epifluorescent microscope and were considered positive if five or more typical elementary bodies were seen. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the direct smear were 89%, 97%, 85%, and 98% for males, and 93%, 96%, 85%, and 98% for females, respectively. The rapid direct specimen test appears to be a satisfactory method for detecting chlamydia in male and female genital specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510051     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/85.1.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  11 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis in hydrocele fluid.

Authors:  G Satpathy; S Mohanty; S P Pani; S K Panda
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

2.  Specificity and sensitivity of chlamydial direct specimen test: a comparative and quantitative study in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic and a high risk group.

Authors:  A Stary; J Söltz-Szöts
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1986-12

3.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cervico-vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant adolescent and adult women. A morphologic and immunofluorescent study.

Authors:  M J Cavaliere; M Y Maeda; N K Shirata; A Longatto Filho; L W Shih; M de Siqueira; M G de Muelenare Correa; H F Oliveira
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J E Graham
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Chlamydia trachomitis antigen in the cervix: prevalence in a student population.

Authors:  M A Noble; R L Barteluk; D J Farquhar; R P Smith
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Periodic health examination, 1996 update: 2. Screening for chlamydial infections. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  H D Davies; E E Wang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens.

Authors:  R C Tilton; F N Judson; R C Barnes; R P Gruninger; R W Ryan; O Steingrimsson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Simplified culture procedure for large-scale screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  M I Lees; D M Newnan; S M Garland
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.