Literature DB >> 32740864

Texture analysis on bi-parametric MRI for evaluation of aggressiveness in patients with prostate cancer.

Tae Wook Baek1, Seung Ho Kim2, Sang Joon Park3, Eun Joo Park1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between texture parameters based on bi-parametric MRI and Gleason score (GS) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and to evaluate diagnostic performance of any significant parameter for discriminating clinically significant cancer (CSC, GS ≥ 7) from non-CSC.
METHODS: A total of 116 patients who had been confirmed as prostate adenocarcinoma by radical prostatectomy or biopsy were divided into a training (n = 65) and a validation dataset (n = 51). All of the patients underwent preoperative 3T-MRI. Texture analysis was performed on axial T2WI and ADC maps (generated from b values, 0 and 1000 s/mm2) using dedicated software to cover the whole tumor volume. The correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the association between texture parameters and GS, and subsequent multiple regression analyses were applied for the significant parameters. To extract an optimal cut-off value for prediction of CSC, ROC curve analysis was performed.
RESULTS: In the training dataset, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) entropy on ADC map was the only significant indicator for GS (coefficient of determination R2, 0.4227, P = 0.0034). The AUC of GLCM entropy on ADC map was 0.825 (95% CI 0.711-0.907) with a maximum accuracy of 82%, a sensitivity of 86%, a specificity of 71%. When a cut-off value of 2.92 was applied to the validation dataset, it showed an accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 98%, and a specificity of 70%.
CONCLUSION: GLCM entropy on ADC map was associated with GS in patients with PCa and its estimated accuracy for discriminating CSC from non-CSC was 82%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Prostate cancer; Prostate gland; Texture analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32740864     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02683-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  21 in total

1.  Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores.

Authors:  Andreas Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Harini Veeraraghavan; Duc Fehr; Junting Zheng; Debra Goldman; Chaya Moskowitz; Samson W Fine; Victor E Reuter; James Eastham; Evis Sala; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  T2-weighted MRI-derived textural features reflect prostate cancer aggressiveness: preliminary results.

Authors:  Gabriel Nketiah; Mattijs Elschot; Eugene Kim; Jose R Teruel; Tom W Scheenen; Tone F Bathen; Kirsten M Selnæs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Moon Hyung Choi; Chan Kyo Kim; Young Joon Lee; Seung Eun Jung
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Clinical Application of Biparametric MRI Texture Analysis for Detection and Evaluation of High-Grade Prostate Cancer in Zone-Specific Regions.

Authors:  Xiang-Ke Niu; Zhi-Fan Chen; Lin Chen; Jun Li; Tao Peng; Xin Li
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek J Rosario; Edward Rowe; David E Neal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Radu Rozenberg; Rebecca E Thornhill; Trevor A Flood; Shaheed W Hakim; Christopher Lim; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Head-to-Head Comparison Between Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Chong Hyun Suh; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Seung Hyup Kim; Min Hoan Moon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Park; Dae Chul Jung; Young Taik Oh; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong; Kyunghwa Han
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Texture analysis methodologies for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrzej Materka
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.986

View more
  1 in total

1.  DWI-related texture analysis for prostate cancer: differences in correlation with histological aggressiveness and data repeatability between peripheral and transition zones.

Authors:  Chie Tsuruta; Kenji Hirata; Kohsuke Kudo; Naoya Masumori; Masamitsu Hatakenaka
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2022-01-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.