Literature DB >> 26836049

Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.

Sung Yoon Park1, Dae Chul Jung1, Young Taik Oh1, Nam Hoon Cho1, Young Deuk Choi1, Koon Ho Rha1, Sung Joon Hong1, Kyunghwa Han1.   

Abstract

Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26836049     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.16151133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  51 in total

1.  Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Stephanie A Harmon; Tristan Barrett; Leonardo K Bittencourt; Yan Mee Law; Haytham Shebel; Julie Y An; Marcin Czarniecki; Sherif Mehralivand; Mehmet Coskun; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of use of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS V2) with multiparametric MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Min Tang; Sipan Chen; Xiaoyan Lei; Xiaoling Zhang; Yi Huan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of unfavorable pathology in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hakmin Lee; Chan Kyo Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Hyun Hwan Sung; Deok Hyun Han; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The diagnostic value of PI-RADS V1 and V2 using multiparametric MRI in transition zone prostate clinical cancer.

Authors:  Ximing Wang; Jie Bao; Xiaoxia Ping; Chunhong Hu; Jianquan Hou; Fenglin Dong; Lingchuan Guo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.

Authors:  Borna K Barth; Pieter J L De Visschere; Alexander Cornelius; Carlos Nicolau; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Validation of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Michael Nguyentat; Alexander Ushinsky; Alessandra Miranda-Aguirre; Edward Uchio; Chandana Lall; Layla Shirkhoda; Thomas Lee; Christopher Green; Roozbeh Houshyar
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2017-10-12

7.  Significant changes of T2 value in the peripheral zone and seminal vesicles after ejaculation.

Authors:  Takeshi Shin; Yasushi Kaji; Toshiro Shukuya; Miwako Nozaki; Shigehiro Soh; Hiroshi Okada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  PI-RADS v2: Current standing and future outlook.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Barış Türkbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-05-01

9.  Texture analysis on bi-parametric MRI for evaluation of aggressiveness in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tae Wook Baek; Seung Ho Kim; Sang Joon Park; Eun Joo Park
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-01

10.  A urologist's perspective on prostate cancer imaging: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Arvin K George; Baris Turkbey; Subin G Valayil; Akhil Muthigi; Francesca Mertan; Michael Kongnyuy; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.