Literature DB >> 27003049

Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.

Radu Rozenberg1, Rebecca E Thornhill1, Trevor A Flood2, Shaheed W Hakim1, Christopher Lim1, Nicola Schieda1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate whole-lesion quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the prediction of Gleason score (GS) upgrading in 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer diagnosed at systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy underwent 3-T MRI and radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2012 and 2014. A blinded radiologist contoured dominant tumors on ADC maps using histopathologic correlation. The whole-lesion mean ADC, ADC ratio (normalized to peripheral zone), ADC histogram, and texture analysis were compared between tumors with GS upgrading and those without GS upgrading using multivariate ROC analyses and logistic regression modeling.
RESULTS: Tumors were upgraded to GS 4 + 3 = 7 after RP in 26% (n = 14) of the 54 patients, and tumors were downgraded after RP in none of the patients. The mean ADC, ADC ratio, 10th-centile ADC, 25th-centile ADC, and 50th-centile ADC were similar between patients with GS 3 + 4 = 7 tumors (0.99 ± 0.22, 0.58 ± 0.15, 0.77 ± 0.31, 0.94 ± 0.28, and 1.15 ± 0.24, respectively) and patients with upgraded GS 4 + 3 = 7 tumors (1.02 ± 0.18, 0.55 ± 0.11, 0.71 ± 0.26, 0.89 ± 0.20, and 1.11 ± 0.16) (p > 0.05). Regression models combining texture features improved the prediction of GS upgrading. The combination of kurtosis, entropy, and skewness yielded an AUC of 0.76 (SE = 0.07) (p < 0.001), a sensitivity of 71%, and a specificity of 73%. The combination of kurtosis, heterogeneity, entropy, and skewness yielded an AUC of 0.77 (SE = 0.07) (p < 0.001), a sensitivity of 71%, and a specificity of 78%.
CONCLUSION: In this study, whole-lesion mean ADC, ADC ratio, and ADC histogram analysis were not predictive of pathologic upgrading of GS 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer after RP. ADC texture analysis improved accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DWI; Gleason score; MRI; apparent diffusion coefficient; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27003049     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  24 in total

1.  AI-based applications in hybrid imaging: how to build smart and truly multi-parametric decision models for radiomics.

Authors:  Isabella Castiglioni; Francesca Gallivanone; Paolo Soda; Michele Avanzo; Joseph Stancanello; Marco Aiello; Matteo Interlenghi; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer using T2-weighted (T2W) MRI: comparison of subjective features and quantitative shape analysis.

Authors:  Satheesh Krishna; Nicola Schieda; Matthew Df McInnes; Trevor A Flood; Rebecca E Thornhill
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prediction of Clinical Pathologic Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Volumetric Texture Analysis Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps.

Authors:  Zhihua Lu; Lei Wang; Kaijian Xia; Heng Jiang; Xiaoyan Weng; Jianlong Jiang; Mei Wu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - Transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment category.

Authors:  Susan John; Steven Cooper; Rodney H Breau; Trevor A Flood; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallee; Christopher Morash; Joseph O'sullivan; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Ileana Montoya Perez; Parisa Movahedi; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Jonne Pohjankukka; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.

Authors:  Hong-Li Liu; Min Zong; Han Wei; Jian-Juan Lou; Si-Qi Wang; Qi-Gui Zou; Hai-Bin Shi; Yan-Ni Jiang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Background, current role, and potential applications of radiogenomics.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Fuki Shitano; Evis Sala; Richard K Do; Robert J Young; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Elizabeth J Sutton; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for assessing thymic epithelial tumours: correlation with world health organization classification and clinical staging.

Authors:  Ling-Yan Kong; Wei Zhang; Yue Zhou; Hai Xu; Hai-Bin Shi; Qing Feng; Xiao-Quan Xu; Tong-Fu Yu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Texture analysis on bi-parametric MRI for evaluation of aggressiveness in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tae Wook Baek; Seung Ho Kim; Sang Joon Park; Eun Joo Park
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-08-01

Review 10.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie Boustani; Darko Pucar; Lawrence Saperstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.