Literature DB >> 27626136

10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Freddie C Hamdy1, Jenny L Donovan1, J Athene Lane1, Malcolm Mason1, Chris Metcalfe1, Peter Holding1, Michael Davis1, Tim J Peters1, Emma L Turner1, Richard M Martin1, Jon Oxley1, Mary Robinson1, John Staffurth1, Eleanor Walsh1, Prasad Bollina1, James Catto1, Andrew Doble1, Alan Doherty1, David Gillatt1, Roger Kockelbergh1, Howard Kynaston1, Alan Paul1, Philip Powell1, Stephen Prescott1, Derek J Rosario1, Edward Rowe1, David E Neal1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of treatments for prostate cancer that is detected by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains uncertain.
METHODS: We compared active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, and external-beam radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Between 1999 and 2009, a total of 82,429 men 50 to 69 years of age received a PSA test; 2664 received a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer, and 1643 agreed to undergo randomization to active monitoring (545 men), surgery (553), or radiotherapy (545). The primary outcome was prostate-cancer mortality at a median of 10 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the rates of disease progression, metastases, and all-cause deaths.
RESULTS: There were 17 prostate-cancer-specific deaths overall: 8 in the active-monitoring group (1.5 deaths per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7 to 3.0), 5 in the surgery group (0.9 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.2), and 4 in the radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.0); the difference among the groups was not significant (P=0.48 for the overall comparison). In addition, no significant difference was seen among the groups in the number of deaths from any cause (169 deaths overall; P=0.87 for the comparison among the three groups). Metastases developed in more men in the active-monitoring group (33 men; 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 4.5 to 8.8) than in the surgery group (13 men; 2.4 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.2) or the radiotherapy group (16 men; 3.0 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.9) (P=0.004 for the overall comparison). Higher rates of disease progression were seen in the active-monitoring group (112 men; 22.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 19.0 to 27.5) than in the surgery group (46 men; 8.9 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 11.9) or the radiotherapy group (46 men; 9.0 events per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 6.7 to 12.0) (P<0.001 for the overall comparison).
CONCLUSIONS: At a median of 10 years, prostate-cancer-specific mortality was low irrespective of the treatment assigned, with no significant difference among treatments. Surgery and radiotherapy were associated with lower incidences of disease progression and metastases than was active monitoring. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; ProtecT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN20141297 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02044172 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27626136     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  650 in total

Review 1.  Management of Urethral Stricture and Bladder Neck Contracture Following Primary and Salvage Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Brendan Michael Browne; Alex J Vanni
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Event-Free Survival, a Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Composite End Point, Is Not a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radiation.

Authors:  Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Marc Buyse; Susan Halabi; Philip W Kantoff; Oliver Sartor; Howard Soule; Donald Berry; Noel Clarke; Laurence Collette; Anthony D'Amico; Richard De Abreu Lourenco; James Dignam; Mario Eisenberger; Nicholas James; Karim Fizazi; Silke Gillessen; Yohann Loriot; Nicolas Mottet; Wendy Parulekar; Howard Sandler; Daniel E Spratt; Matthew R Sydes; Bertrand Tombal; Scott Williams; Christopher J Sweeney
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Reconsidering the Trade-offs of Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Yaw A Nyame; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Jim C Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prostate Cancer Screening and Management in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients.

Authors:  Ezequiel Becher; Alex Wang; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2019

5.  Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Cancers - A Viable Solution to Overtreatment?

Authors:  Megan R Haymart; David C Miller; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A Framework for Treatment Decision Making at Prostate Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Jane M Lange; Bruce J Trock; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Effect of Standard vs Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: The NRG Oncology RTOG 0126 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeff M Michalski; Jennifer Moughan; James Purdy; Walter Bosch; Deborah W Bruner; Jean-Paul Bahary; Harold Lau; Marie Duclos; Matthew Parliament; Gerard Morton; Daniel Hamstra; Michael Seider; Michael I Lock; Malti Patel; Hiram Gay; Eric Vigneault; Kathryn Winter; Howard Sandler
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Time between diagnosis and surgical treatment on pathological and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer: does it matter?

Authors:  Mariana Andozia Morini; Roberto Lodeiro Muller; Paulo César Barbosa de Castro Junior; Rafael José de Souza; Eliney Ferreira Faria
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Is time from diagnosis to radical prostatectomy associated with oncological outcomes?

Authors:  Kirsti Aas; Sophie Dorothea Fosså; Rune Kvåle; Bjørn Møller; Tor Åge Myklebust; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Stig Müller; Viktor Berge
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Variation in prostate cancer treatment and spending among Medicare shared savings program accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Samuel R Kaufman; Tudor Borza; Phyllis Yan; David C Miller; Ted A Skolarus; John M Hollingsworth; Edward C Norton; Vahakn B Shahinian; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.