| Literature DB >> 28327098 |
Parash Mani Bhandari1, Dipika Neupane2, Shristi Rijal2, Kiran Thapa2, Shiva Raj Mishra3,4, Amod Kumar Poudyal2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence on the burden of depression, internet addiction and poor sleep quality in undergraduate students from Nepal is virtually non-existent. While the interaction between sleep quality, internet addiction and depressive symptoms is frequently assessed in studies, it is not well explored if sleep quality or internet addiction statistically mediates the association between the other two variables.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Insomnia; Internet use; Nepal; Undergraduates
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28327098 PMCID: PMC5361804 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1275-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Psychiatry ISSN: 1471-244X Impact factor: 3.630
Multivariable linear regression models of students’ characteristics with sleep quality, internet addiction and depressive symptoms
| Characteristics | Sleep quality | Internet addiction | Depressive symptoms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | BCa 95% CI | b | BCa 95% CI | b | BCa 95% CI | |
| Age |
| −0.164, −0.008 |
| −0.773, −0.183 | − | −0.275, −0.024 |
| Sex (reference: male) | −0.191 | −0.537, 0.148 |
| −3.530, −1.267 | 0.471 | −0.139, 1.099 |
| Caste (reference: Brahmin/Chhetri) | 0.253 | −0.077, 0.609 | −0.017 | −1.337, 1.339 | 0.347 | −0.255, 0.949 |
| Religion (reference: Hindu) |
| −0.997, −0.002 | −0.205 | −2.448, 2.096 | −0.186 | −1.127, 0.770 |
| Marital status (reference: married) | −0.205 | −1.315, 0.843 | 0.159 | −4.123, 4.173 | 1.143 | −0.338, 2.561 |
| Family size | 0.017 | −0.057, 0.092 | −0.072 | −0.297, 0.167 | −0.102 | −0.213, 0.017 |
| Employment status (reference: employed) | −0.315 | −0.763, 0.111 | 0.216 | −1.240, 1.618 | −0.631 | −1.476, 0.210 |
| Tobacco use (reference: users) | 0.362 | −0.387, 1.100 | 0.618 | −1.830, 3.192 | −0.546 | −1.701, 0.607 |
| Alcohol use (reference: users) |
| −1.272, −0.301 | −1.050 | −2.811, 0.688 | −0.478 | −1.305, 0.328 |
| Sexual activity (reference: sexually inactive) |
| 0.097, 0.940 |
| 0.510, 3.700 |
| 0.384, 1.994 |
| Academic performance in previous year (reference: failed) |
| −1.627, −0.414 |
| −4.213, −0.751 |
| −3.125, −0.963 |
| Study year | −0.123 | −0.277, 0.031 | 0.053 | −0.479, 0.584 | − | −0.586, −0.078 |
| Campus type (reference: public) | −0.039 | −0.355, 0.282 |
| 0.192, 2.459 | −0.183 | −0.739, 0.359 |
| Study shift (reference: morning) | −0.189 | −0.524, 0.143 |
| 0.602, 3.072 | 0.255 | −0.281, 0.799 |
Statistically significant associations are highlighted in bold
b: unstandardized coefficient; BCa: Bias corrected and accelerated: 5000 bootstrap samples
Effect estimates of effects of sleep quality on depressive symptoms in undergraduate students mediated via internet addiction
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | |
| Indirect effect | 0.146 (0.024) | 0.103, 0.197 | 0.145 (0.024) | 0.103, 0.198 | 0.140 (0.024) | 0.098, 0.192 | 0.138 (0.025) | 0.096, 0.192 |
| Direct effect | 0.717 (0.051) | 0.617, 0.817 | 0.720 (0.051) | 0.620, 0.820 | 0.713 (0.051) | 0.613, 0.814 | 0.697 (0.052) | 0.596, 0.798 |
| Total effect | 0.863 (0.051) | 0.764, 0.962 | 0.865 (0.051) | 0.765, 0.965 | 0.853 (0.051) | 0.753, 0.954 | 0.835 (0.051) | 0.735, 0.936 |
| Proportion of total effect mediated | 0.169 | 0.168 | 0.164 | 0.165 | ||||
| Ratio of indirect to direct effect | 0.204 | 0.201 | 0.196 | 0.198 | ||||
Model 1: unadjusted mediational model
Model 2: adjusted for sociodemographics (age, sex, caste, religion, marital status, family size, employment status)
Model 3: adjusted for sociodemographics + behavioral variables (tobacco use, alcohol use, sexual activity)
Model 4: adjusted for sociodemographics + behavioral variables + educational variables (class hours, academic year, campus type, academic performance in previous year)
b: unstandardized coefficient; BCa, Bias corrected and accelerated: 5000 bootstrap samples
Effect estimates of effects of internet addiction on depressive symptoms in undergraduate students mediated via sleep quality
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | b (SE) | BCa 95% CI | |
| Indirect effect | 0.064 (0.008) | 0.049, 0.081 | 0.063 (0.008) | 0.048, 0.080 | 0.060 (0.008) | 0.046, 0.078 | 0.059 (0.008) | 0.044, 0.076 |
| Direct effect | 0.130 (0.014) | 0.101, 0.158 | 0.134 (0.015) | 0.106, 0.163 | 0.133 (0.015) | 0.104, 0.161 | 0.132 (0.015) | 0.103, 0.161 |
| Total effect | 0.194 (0.015) | 0.164, 0.223 | 0.197 (0.015) | 0.167, 0.227 | 0.193 (0.015) | 0.163, 0.223 | 0.191 (0.015) | 0.161, 0.221 |
| Proportion of total effect mediated | 0.330 | 0.320 | 0.311 | 0.309 | ||||
| Ratio of indirect to direct effect | 0.493 | 0.469 | 0.453 | 0.446 | ||||
Model 1: unadjusted mediational model
Model 2: adjusted for sociodemographics (age, sex, caste, religion, marital status, family size, employment status)
Model 3: adjusted for sociodemographics + behavioral variables (tobacco use, alcohol use, sexual activity)
Model 4: adjusted for sociodemographics + behavioral variables + educational variables (class hours, academic year, campus type, academic performance in previous year)
b: unstandardized coefficient; BCa, Bias corrected and accelerated: 5000 bootstrap samples