Literature DB >> 32719724

A robust Fourier-based method to measure pulse pressure variability.

Sebastian Acosta1, Mubbasheer Ahmed2, Suellen M Yin3, Ken M Brady4, Daniel J Penny1, Craig G Rusin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To propose a new method to estimate pulse pressure variability (PPV) in the arterial blood pressure waveform.
METHODS: Traditional techniques of calculating PPV using peak finding have a fundamental flaw that prevents them from accurately resolving PPV for small tidal volumes, limiting the use of PPV to only mechanical ventilated patients. The improved method described here addresses this limitation using Fourier analysis of an oscillatory signal that exhibits a time-varying modulation of its amplitude. The analysis reveals a constraint on the spectral representation that must be satisfied for any oscillatory signal that exhibits a time-varying modulation of its amplitude. This intrinsic mathematical structure is taken advantage of in order to improve the robustness of the algorithm.
RESULTS: The applicability of the method is tested using synthetic data and 100 h of physiologic data collected from patients admitted to Texas Children's Hospital. SIGNIFICANCE AND
CONCLUSION: The proposed method accurately recovers values of PPV at signal-to-noise ratios six times smaller than the traditional method. This is a significant advance for the potential use of PPV to recognize fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation or spontaneous breathing for which the signal-to-noise ratio is expected to be small.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial pulse pressure variation; Fluid responsiveness; Fourier analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32719724      PMCID: PMC7384614          DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2020.101947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control        ISSN: 1746-8094            Impact factor:   3.880


  42 in total

Review 1.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Radial-femoral concordance in time and frequency domain-based estimates of systemic arterial respiratory variation.

Authors:  Robert H Thiele; Douglas A Colquhoun; Jason M Tucker-Schwartz; George T Gillies; Marcel E Durieux
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Dynamic effects of positive-pressure ventilation on canine left ventricular pressure-volume relations.

Authors:  A Y Denault; J Gorcsan; M R Pinsky
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-07

5.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness in infants and neonates undergoing congenital heart surgery.

Authors:  J Renner; O Broch; P Duetschke; J Scheewe; J Höcker; M Moseby; O Jung; B Bein
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Different predictivity of fluid responsiveness by pulse pressure variation in children after surgical repair of ventricular septal defect or tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Ding Han; Shoudong Pan; Xiaonan Wang; Qingyan Jia; Yi Luo; Jia Li; Chuan Ou-Yang
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Chang Hyu Choi; Hong Soon Kim; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Mechanical ventilation-induced intrathoracic pressure distribution and heart-lung interactions*.

Authors:  Benno Lansdorp; Charlotte Hofhuizen; Martijn van Lavieren; Henri van Swieten; Joris Lemson; Michel J A M van Putten; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?

Authors:  Stéphane Soubrier; Fabienne Saulnier; Hervé Hubert; Pierre Delour; Hélène Lenci; Thierry Onimus; Saad Nseir; Alain Durocher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul E Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 6.925

View more
  1 in total

1.  Novel Method of Calculating Pulse Pressure Variation to Predict Fluid Responsiveness to Transfusion in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.

Authors:  Zachary C Foughty; Onur Tavaslioglu; Christopher J Rhee; Leah I Elizondo; Craig G Rusin; Daniel J Penny; Sebastian Acosta; Danielle R Rios
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.314

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.