Literature DB >> 22903732

Radial-femoral concordance in time and frequency domain-based estimates of systemic arterial respiratory variation.

Robert H Thiele1, Douglas A Colquhoun, Jason M Tucker-Schwartz, George T Gillies, Marcel E Durieux.   

Abstract

Commonly used arterial respiratory variation metrics are based on mathematical analysis of arterial waveforms in the time domain. Because the shape of the arterial waveform is dependent on the site at which it is measured, we hypothesized that analysis of the arterial waveform in the frequency domain might provide a relatively site-independent means of measuring arterial respiratory variation. Radial and femoral arterial blood pressures were measured in nineteen patients undergoing liver transplantation. Systolic pressure variation (SPV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), area under the curve variation (AUCV), and mean arterial pressure variation (MAPV) at radial and femoral sites were calculated off-line. Two metrics, "Spectral Peak Ratio" (SPeR) and "Spectral Power Ratio" (SPoR) based on ratios of the spectral peak and spectral area (power) at the respiratory and cardiac frequencies, were calculated at both radial and femoral sites. Variance among radial-femoral differences was compared and correlation coefficients describing the relationship between respiratory variation at the radial and femoral sites were developed. The variance in radial-femoral differences were significantly different (p < 0.001). The correlation between radial and femoral estimates of respiratory variation were 0.746, 0.658, 0.858, 0.882, 0.941, and 0.925 for SPV, PPV, AUCV, MAPV, SPeR, and SPoR, respectively. Assuming a PPV treatment threshold of 12 % (or equivalent), differences in treatment decisions based on radial or femoral estimates would arise in 12, 14, 5.4, 5.7, 4.8, and 5.5 % of minutes for SPV, PPV, AUCV, MAPV, spectral peak ratio, and spectral power ratio, respectively. As compared to frequency domain-based estimates of respiratory variation, SPV and PPV are relatively dependent on the anatomic site at which they are measured. Spectral peak and power ratios are relatively site-independent means of measuring respiratory variation, and may offer a useful alternative to time domain-based techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22903732     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-012-9390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  21 in total

1.  Oscillations in the plethysmographic waveform amplitude: phenomenon hides behind artifacts.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Aymen A Awad; Kirk Shelley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 3.  The arterial pulse in health and disease.

Authors:  M F O'Rourke
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Functional hemodynamic parameters do not reflect volume responsiveness in the immediate phase after acute myocardial ischemia and reperfusion.

Authors:  Nils Kronas; Jens C Kubitz; Stefanie Forkl; Gregor I Kemming; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Comparison of stroke volume variations derived from radial and femoral arterial pressure waveforms during liver transplantation.

Authors:  Y K Kim; W J Shin; J G Song; I G Jun; H Y Kim; S H Seong; G S Hwang
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Jose Otavio Auler; Filomena Galas; Ludhmila Hajjar; Luciana Santos; Thiago Carvalho; Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery.

Authors:  E Deflandre; V Bonhomme; P Hans
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Left ventricular preload and function during graded haemorrhage and retranfusion in pigs: analysis of arterial pressure waveform and correlation with echocardiography.

Authors:  S Preisman; E DiSegni; Z Vered; A Perel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  A brief history of arterial wave mechanics.

Authors:  Kim H Parker
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Further cautions for the use of ventilatory-induced changes in arterial pressures to predict volume responsiveness.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  4 in total

1.  Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.

Authors:  Matthew Lee; Laurence Weinberg; Brett Pearce; Nicholas Scurrah; David A Story; Param Pillai; Peter R McCall; Larry P McNicol; Philip J Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Frequency domain analysis of cerebral near infrared spectroscopy signals during application of an impedance threshold device in spontaneously ventilating volunteers.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Kimberly Naden; Robert H Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Respiratory changes in subclavian vein diameters predicts fluid responsiveness in intensive care patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Raphaël Giraud; Paul S Abraham; Pauline Brindel; Nils Siegenthaler; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A robust Fourier-based method to measure pulse pressure variability.

Authors:  Sebastian Acosta; Mubbasheer Ahmed; Suellen M Yin; Ken M Brady; Daniel J Penny; Craig G Rusin
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.880

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.