Literature DB >> 12065368

Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Frédéric Michard1, Jean-Louis Teboul.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To identify and critically review the published peer-reviewed, English-language studies investigating predictive factors of fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.
DESIGN: Studies were collected by doing a search in MEDLINE (from 1966) and scanning the reference lists of the articles. Studies were selected according to the following criteria: volume expansion performed in critically ill patients, patients classified in two groups (responders and nonresponders) according to the effects of volume expansion on stroke volume or on cardiac output, and comparison of responder and nonresponder patients' characteristics before volume expansion.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were analyzed in which the parameters tested were as follows: (1) static indicators of cardiac preload (right atrial pressure [RAP], pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP], right ventricular end-diastolic volume [RVEDV], and left ventricular end-diastolic area [LVEDA]); and (2) dynamic parameters (inspiratory decrease in RAP [Delta RAP], expiratory decrease in arterial systolic pressure [Delta down], respiratory changes in pulse pressure [Delta PP], and respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity [Delta Vpeak]). Before fluid infusion, RAP, PAOP, RVEDV, and LVEDA were not significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders in three of five studies, in seven of nine studies, in four of six studies, and in one of three studies, respectively. When a significant difference was found, no threshold value could discriminate responders and nonresponders. Before fluid infusion, Delta RAP, Delta down, Delta PP, and Delta Vpeak were significantly higher in responders, and a threshold value predicted fluid responsiveness with high positive (77 to 95%) and negative (81 to 100%) predictive values.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic parameters should be used preferentially to static parameters to predict fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12065368     DOI: 10.1378/chest.121.6.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  286 in total

1.  Assessing cardiac preload or fluid responsiveness? It depends on the question we want to answer.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Calculated global end-diastolic volume does not correspond to the largest heart blood volume: a bias for cardiac function index?

Authors:  François Gilles Brivet; Frédéric Jacobs; Patrice Colin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-11       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler.

Authors:  Michel Slama; Henri Masson; Jean-Louis Teboul; Marie-Luce Arnould; Rachida Nait-Kaoudjt; Bouchra Colas; Marcel Peltier; Christophe Tribouilloy; Dinko Susic; Edward Frohlich; Michel Andréjak
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Riccardo Moretti; Barbara Pizzi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Validity of Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) Compared with Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness.

Authors:  Abhishek Rathore; Shalendra Singh; Ritesh Lamsal; Priya Taank; Debashish Paul
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

7.  The Correlation Between Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Measured by Ultrasonography and Central Venous Pressure.

Authors:  Hans Vaish; Virendra Kumar; Rama Anand; Viswas Chhapola; Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 8.  Fluid management for the prevention and attenuation of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  John R Prowle; Christopher J Kirwan; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  Usefulness of ultrasonographic measurement of the diameter of the inferior vena cava to predict responsiveness to intravascular fluid administration in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Silvio A Ñamendys-Silva; Juan M Arredondo-Armenta; Humberto Guevara-García; Mireya Barragán-Dessavre; Francisco J García-Guillén; Luis A Sánchez-Hurtado; Bertha Córdova-Sánchez; Andoreni R Bautista-Ocampo; Angel Herrera-Gómez; Abelardo Meneses-García
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-10

10.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.