Yoon Seong Choi1,2,3, Sohi Bae4, Jong Hee Chang5, Seok-Gu Kang5, Se Hoon Kim6, Jinna Kim3, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim7, Seung Hong Choi8, Rajan Jain9,10, Seung-Koo Lee3. 1. Duke-NUS Medical School, RADSC ACP, Singapore. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 3. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 6. Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 7. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore. 8. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 9. Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 10. Department of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioma prognosis depends on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. We aimed to predict the IDH status of gliomas from preoperative MR images using a fully automated hybrid approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and radiomics. METHODS: We reviewed 1166 preoperative MR images of gliomas (grades II-IV) from Severance Hospital (n = 856), Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH; n = 107), and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA; n = 203). The Severance set was subdivided into the development (n = 727) and internal test (n = 129) sets. Based on T1 postcontrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, a fully automated model was developed that comprised a CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) and CNN-based classifier for IDH status prediction (Model 2) that uses a hybrid approach based on 2D tumor images and radiomic features from 3D tumor shape and loci guided by Model 1. The trained model was tested on internal (a subset of the Severance set) and external (SNUH and TCIA) test sets. RESULTS: The CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) achieved a dice coefficient of 0.86-0.92 across datasets. Our hybrid model achieved accuracies of 93.8%, 87.9%, and 78.8%, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.86 and areas under the precision-recall curves of 0.88, 0.82, and 0.81 in the internal test, SNUH, and TCIA sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our fully automated hybrid model demonstrated the potential to be a highly reproducible and generalizable tool across different datasets for the noninvasive prediction of the IDH status of gliomas.
BACKGROUND:Glioma prognosis depends on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. We aimed to predict the IDH status of gliomas from preoperative MR images using a fully automated hybrid approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and radiomics. METHODS: We reviewed 1166 preoperative MR images of gliomas (grades II-IV) from Severance Hospital (n = 856), Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH; n = 107), and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA; n = 203). The Severance set was subdivided into the development (n = 727) and internal test (n = 129) sets. Based on T1 postcontrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, a fully automated model was developed that comprised a CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) and CNN-based classifier for IDH status prediction (Model 2) that uses a hybrid approach based on 2D tumor images and radiomic features from 3D tumor shape and loci guided by Model 1. The trained model was tested on internal (a subset of the Severance set) and external (SNUH and TCIA) test sets. RESULTS: The CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) achieved a dice coefficient of 0.86-0.92 across datasets. Our hybrid model achieved accuracies of 93.8%, 87.9%, and 78.8%, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.86 and areas under the precision-recall curves of 0.88, 0.82, and 0.81 in the internal test, SNUH, and TCIA sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our fully automated hybrid model demonstrated the potential to be a highly reproducible and generalizable tool across different datasets for the noninvasive prediction of the IDH status of gliomas.
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; Jerrold Boxerman; Daniel Barboriak; Bradley J Erickson; Marion Smits; Sarah J Nelson; Elizabeth Gerstner; Brian Alexander; Gregory Goldmacher; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Vogelbaum; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Whitney B Pope; Dewen Yang; Caroline Chung; Michael V Knopp; Soonme Cha; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordan Xu; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Panagiotis Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Daniel H Lachance; Ian F Parney; Jan C Buckner; Bradley J Erickson Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: John Maynard; Sachi Okuchi; Stephen Wastling; Ayisha Al Busaidi; Ofran Almossawi; Wonderboy Mbatha; Sebastian Brandner; Zane Jaunmuktane; Ali Murat Koc; Laura Mancini; Rolf Jäger; Stefanie Thust Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Miguel Angel Tejada Neyra; Ulf Neuberger; Annekathrin Reinhardt; Gianluca Brugnara; David Bonekamp; Martin Sill; Antje Wick; David T W Jones; Alexander Radbruch; Andreas Unterberg; Jürgen Debus; Sabine Heiland; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Christel Herold-Mende; Stefan Pfister; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; David Capper; Martin Bendszus; Philipp Kickingereder Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Shuncong Wang; Yuanbo Feng; Lei Chen; Jie Yu; Chantal Van Ongeval; Guy Bormans; Yue Li; Yicheng Ni Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 5.942
Authors: Julia Cluceru; Yannet Interian; Joanna J Phillips; Annette M Molinaro; Tracy L Luks; Paula Alcaide-Leon; Marram P Olson; Devika Nair; Marisa LaFontaine; Anny Shai; Pranathi Chunduru; Valentina Pedoia; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Susan M Chang; Janine M Lupo Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 13.029