PURPOSE: To establish the frequency of IDH1 mutations in glioblastomas at a population level, and to assess whether they allow reliable discrimination between primary (de novo) glioblastomas and secondary glioblastomas that progressed from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We screened glioblastomas from a population-based study for IDH1 mutations and correlated them with clinical data and other genetic alterations. RESULTS: IDH1 mutations were detected in 36 of 407 glioblastomas (8.8%). Glioblastoma patients with IDH1 mutations were younger (mean, 47.9 years) than those with EGFR amplification (60.9 years) and were associated with significantly longer survival (mean, 27.1 versus 11.3 months; P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations were frequent in glioblastomas diagnosed as secondary (22 of 30; 73%), but rare in primary glioblastomas (14 of 377; 3.7%: P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations as genetic marker of secondary glioblastoma corresponded to the respective clinical diagnosis in 95% of cases. Glioblastomas with IDH1 mutation diagnosed as primary had clinical and genetic profiles similar to those of secondary glioblastomas, suggesting that they may have rapidly progressed from a less malignant precursor lesion that escaped clinical diagnosis and were thus misclassified as primary. Conversely, glioblastomas without IDH1 mutations clinically diagnosed as secondary typically developed from anaplastic rather than low-grade gliomas, suggesting that at least some were actually primary glioblastomas, that may have been misclassified, possibly due to histologic sampling error. CONCLUSION: IDH1 mutations are a strong predictor of a more favorable prognosis and a highly selective molecular marker of secondary glioblastomas that complements clinical criteria for distinguishing them from primary glioblastomas.
PURPOSE: To establish the frequency of IDH1 mutations in glioblastomas at a population level, and to assess whether they allow reliable discrimination between primary (de novo) glioblastomas and secondary glioblastomas that progressed from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We screened glioblastomas from a population-based study for IDH1 mutations and correlated them with clinical data and other genetic alterations. RESULTS:IDH1 mutations were detected in 36 of 407 glioblastomas (8.8%). Glioblastomapatients with IDH1 mutations were younger (mean, 47.9 years) than those with EGFR amplification (60.9 years) and were associated with significantly longer survival (mean, 27.1 versus 11.3 months; P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations were frequent in glioblastomas diagnosed as secondary (22 of 30; 73%), but rare in primary glioblastomas (14 of 377; 3.7%: P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations as genetic marker of secondary glioblastoma corresponded to the respective clinical diagnosis in 95% of cases. Glioblastomas with IDH1 mutation diagnosed as primary had clinical and genetic profiles similar to those of secondary glioblastomas, suggesting that they may have rapidly progressed from a less malignant precursor lesion that escaped clinical diagnosis and were thus misclassified as primary. Conversely, glioblastomas without IDH1 mutations clinically diagnosed as secondary typically developed from anaplastic rather than low-grade gliomas, suggesting that at least some were actually primary glioblastomas, that may have been misclassified, possibly due to histologic sampling error. CONCLUSION:IDH1 mutations are a strong predictor of a more favorable prognosis and a highly selective molecular marker of secondary glioblastomas that complements clinical criteria for distinguishing them from primary glioblastomas.
Authors: Emma Camacho-Urkaray; Jorge Santos-Juanes; Francisco Borja Gutiérrez-Corres; Beatriz García; Luis M Quirós; Isabel Guerra-Merino; José Javier Aguirre; Iván Fernández-Vega Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jelena Lazovic; Horacio Soto; David Piccioni; Jerry R Lou; Sichen Li; Leili Mirsadraei; William Yong; Robert Prins; Linda M Liau; Benjamin M Ellingson; Timothy F Cloughesy; Albert Lai; Whitney B Pope Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Christina Hamisch; Maximilian Ruge; Stephanie Kellermann; Ann-Cathrin Kohl; Inga Duval; Roland Goldbrunner; Stefan J Grau Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 4.130