Literature DB >> 19755387

IDH1 mutations as molecular signature and predictive factor of secondary glioblastomas.

Sumihito Nobusawa1, Takuya Watanabe, Paul Kleihues, Hiroko Ohgaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish the frequency of IDH1 mutations in glioblastomas at a population level, and to assess whether they allow reliable discrimination between primary (de novo) glioblastomas and secondary glioblastomas that progressed from low-grade or anaplastic astrocytoma. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We screened glioblastomas from a population-based study for IDH1 mutations and correlated them with clinical data and other genetic alterations.
RESULTS: IDH1 mutations were detected in 36 of 407 glioblastomas (8.8%). Glioblastoma patients with IDH1 mutations were younger (mean, 47.9 years) than those with EGFR amplification (60.9 years) and were associated with significantly longer survival (mean, 27.1 versus 11.3 months; P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations were frequent in glioblastomas diagnosed as secondary (22 of 30; 73%), but rare in primary glioblastomas (14 of 377; 3.7%: P < 0.0001). IDH1 mutations as genetic marker of secondary glioblastoma corresponded to the respective clinical diagnosis in 95% of cases. Glioblastomas with IDH1 mutation diagnosed as primary had clinical and genetic profiles similar to those of secondary glioblastomas, suggesting that they may have rapidly progressed from a less malignant precursor lesion that escaped clinical diagnosis and were thus misclassified as primary. Conversely, glioblastomas without IDH1 mutations clinically diagnosed as secondary typically developed from anaplastic rather than low-grade gliomas, suggesting that at least some were actually primary glioblastomas, that may have been misclassified, possibly due to histologic sampling error.
CONCLUSION: IDH1 mutations are a strong predictor of a more favorable prognosis and a highly selective molecular marker of secondary glioblastomas that complements clinical criteria for distinguishing them from primary glioblastomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19755387     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  247 in total

1.  CD166/activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule is expressed on glioblastoma progenitor cells and involved in the regulation of tumor cell invasion.

Authors:  Noriyuki Kijima; Naoki Hosen; Naoki Kagawa; Naoya Hashimoto; Akiko Nakano; Yasunori Fujimoto; Manabu Kinoshita; Haruo Sugiyama; Toshiki Yoshimine
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Molecular profile of oligodendrogliomas in young patients.

Authors:  Vaishali Suri; Prerana Jha; Shipra Agarwal; Pankaj Pathak; Mehar Chand Sharma; Vikas Sharma; Sudhanshu Shukla; Kumaravel Somasundaram; Ashok Kumar Mahapatra; Shashank Sharad Kale; Chitra Sarkar
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Establishing cut-off points with clinical relevance for bcl-2, cyclin D1, p16, p21, p27, p53, Sox11 and WT1 expression in glioblastoma - a short report.

Authors:  Emma Camacho-Urkaray; Jorge Santos-Juanes; Francisco Borja Gutiérrez-Corres; Beatriz García; Luis M Quirós; Isabel Guerra-Merino; José Javier Aguirre; Iván Fernández-Vega
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.730

4.  Neurocognitive function varies by IDH1 genetic mutation status in patients with malignant glioma prior to surgical resection.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Wefel; Kyle R Noll; Ganesh Rao; Daniel P Cahill
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Expression level of miRNAs on chromosome 14q32.31 region correlates with tumor aggressiveness and survival of glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Tal Shahar; Avital Granit; Daniel Zrihan; Tamar Canello; Hanna Charbit; Ofira Einstein; Uri Rozovski; Sharona Elgavish; Zvi Ram; Tali Siegal; Iris Lavon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Paradoxical prognostic impact of TERT promoter mutations in gliomas depends on different histological and genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  Hao You; Yao Wu; Kai Chang; Xiao Shi; Xin-Da Chen; Wei Yan; Rui Li
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 5.243

7.  Diagnostic discrepancies in malignant astrocytoma due to limited small pathological tumor sample can be overcome by IDH1 testing.

Authors:  Betty Y S Kim; Wen Jiang; Jason Beiko; Sujit S Prabhu; Franco DeMonte; Mark R Gilbert; Raymond Sawaya; Kenneth D Aldape; Daniel P Cahill; Ian E McCutcheon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Radiogenomics correlation between MR imaging features and major genetic profiles in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Hong; Seung Hong Choi; Dong Jae Shin; Sang Won Jo; Roh-Eul Yoo; Koung Mi Kang; Tae Jin Yun; Ji-Hoon Kim; Chul-Ho Sohn; Sung-Hye Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Tae Min Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Il Han Kim; Soon Tae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Detection of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid in vivo by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in U87 glioma cells overexpressing isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutation.

Authors:  Jelena Lazovic; Horacio Soto; David Piccioni; Jerry R Lou; Sichen Li; Leili Mirsadraei; William Yong; Robert Prins; Linda M Liau; Benjamin M Ellingson; Timothy F Cloughesy; Albert Lai; Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Impact of treatment on survival of patients with secondary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Christina Hamisch; Maximilian Ruge; Stephanie Kellermann; Ann-Cathrin Kohl; Inga Duval; Roland Goldbrunner; Stefan J Grau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.