Literature DB >> 35794409

A multimodal domain adaptive segmentation framework for IDH genotype prediction.

Hailong Zeng1, Zhen Xing2, Fenglian Gao3, Zhigang Wu4, Wanrong Huang2, Yan Su2, Zhong Chen1, Shuhui Cai1, Dairong Cao5, Congbo Cai6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The gene mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) in gliomas leads to a different prognosis. It is challenging to perform automated tumor segmentation and genotype prediction directly using label-deprived multimodal magnetic resonance (MR) images. We propose a novel framework that employs a domain adaptive mechanism to address this issue.
METHODS: Multimodal domain adaptive segmentation (MDAS) framework was proposed to solve the gap issue in cross dataset model transfer. Image translation was used to adaptively align the multimodal data from two domains at the image level, and segmentation consistency loss was proposed to retain more pathological information through semantic constraints. The data distribution between the labeled public dataset and label-free target dataset was learned to achieve better unsupervised segmentation results on the target dataset. Then, the segmented tumor foci were used as a mask to extract the radiomics and deep features. And the subsequent prediction of IDH gene mutation status was conducted by training a random forest classifier. The prediction model does not need any expert segmented labels.
RESULTS: We implemented our method on the public BraTS 2019 dataset and 110 astrocytoma cases of grade II-IV brain tumors from our hospital. We obtained a Dice score of 77.41% for unsupervised tumor segmentation, a genotype prediction accuracy (ACC) of 0.7639 and an area under curve (AUC) of 0.8600. Experimental results demonstrate that our domain adaptive approach outperforms the methods utilizing direct transfer learning. The model using hybrid features gives better results than the model using radiomics or deep features alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Domain adaptation enables the segmentation network to achieve better performance, and the extraction of mixed features at multiple levels on the segmented region of interest ensures effective prediction of the IDH gene mutation status.
© 2022. CARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Domain adaptation; IDH mutation; Radiomics; Unsupervised segmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35794409     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02700-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   3.421


  12 in total

1.  Unsupervised domain adaptation for medical imaging segmentation with self-ensembling.

Authors:  Christian S Perone; Pedro Ballester; Rodrigo C Barros; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Timo M Deist; Jurgen Peerlings; Evelyn E C de Jong; Janita van Timmeren; Sebastian Sanduleanu; Ruben T H M Larue; Aniek J G Even; Arthur Jochems; Yvonka van Wijk; Henry Woodruff; Johan van Soest; Tim Lustberg; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Andre Dekker; Felix M Mottaghy; Joachim E Wildberger; Sean Walsh
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Unsupervised Bidirectional Cross-Modality Adaptation via Deeply Synergistic Image and Feature Alignment for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Cheng Chen; Qi Dou; Hao Chen; Jing Qin; Pheng Ann Heng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Value and limitations of immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing for detection of the IDH1-R132H mutation in diffuse glioma biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Matthias Preusser; Adelheid Wöhrer; Susanne Stary; Romana Höftberger; Berthold Streubel; Johannes A Hainfellner
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 5.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.

Authors:  David N Louis; Arie Perry; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Webster K Cavenee; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Paul Kleihues; David W Ellison
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 17.088

6.  Machine Learning-Based Radiomics for Molecular Subtyping of Gliomas.

Authors:  Chia-Feng Lu; Fei-Ting Hsu; Kevin Li-Chun Hsieh; Yu-Chieh Jill Kao; Sho-Jen Cheng; Justin Bo-Kai Hsu; Ping-Huei Tsai; Ray-Jade Chen; Chao-Ching Huang; Yun Yen; Cheng-Yu Chen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Imaging Correlates of Adult Glioma Genotypes.

Authors:  Marion Smits; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  A Review of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Bryan Oronsky; Tony R Reid; Arnold Oronsky; Navjot Sandhu; Susan J Knox
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.