Literature DB >> 28785873

Residual Deep Convolutional Neural Network Predicts MGMT Methylation Status.

Panagiotis Korfiatis1, Timothy L Kline1, Daniel H Lachance2, Ian F Parney3, Jan C Buckner4, Bradley J Erickson5.   

Abstract

Predicting methylation of the O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene status utilizing MRI imaging is of high importance since it is a predictor of response and prognosis in brain tumors. In this study, we compare three different residual deep neural network (ResNet) architectures to evaluate their ability in predicting MGMT methylation status without the need for a distinct tumor segmentation step. We found that the ResNet50 (50 layers) architecture was the best performing model, achieving an accuracy of 94.90% (+/- 3.92%) for the test set (classification of a slice as no tumor, methylated MGMT, or non-methylated). ResNet34 (34 layers) achieved 80.72% (+/- 13.61%) while ResNet18 (18 layers) accuracy was 76.75% (+/- 20.67%). ResNet50 performance was statistically significantly better than both ResNet18 and ResNet34 architectures (p < 0.001). We report a method that alleviates the need of extensive preprocessing and acts as a proof of concept that deep neural architectures can be used to predict molecular biomarkers from routine medical images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; MGMT methylation; MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28785873      PMCID: PMC5603430          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0009-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  27 in total

1.  Continuing the search for MR imaging biomarkers for MGMT promoter methylation status: conventional and perfusion MRI revisited.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Antonio M P Omuro; Akash D Shah; Jerome J Graber; Weiji Shi; Zhigang Zhang; Robert J Young
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 3.  Radiogenomics and imaging phenotypes in glioblastoma: novel observations and correlation with molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Deep learning for automated skeletal bone age assessment in X-ray images.

Authors:  C Spampinato; S Palazzo; D Giordano; M Aldinucci; R Leonardi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Martin J van den Bent; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Predicting MGMT methylation status of glioblastomas from MRI texture.

Authors:  Ilya Levner; Sylvia Drabycz; Gloria Roldan; Paula De Robles; J Gregory Cairncross; Ross Mitchell
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009

7.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  IDH mutation and MGMT promoter methylation are associated with the pseudoprogression and improved prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme patients who have undergone concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Hailong Li; Jiye Li; Gang Cheng; Jianning Zhang; Xuezhen Li
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  Prediction of methylguanine methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Sung Soo Ahn; Na-Young Shin; Jong Hee Chang; Se Hoon Kim; Eui Hyun Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method.

Authors:  Dayle Rundle-Thiele; Bryan Day; Brett Stringer; Michael Fay; Jennifer Martin; Rosalind L Jeffree; Paul Thomas; Christopher Bell; Olivier Salvado; Yaniv Gal; Alan Coulthard; Stuart Crozier; Stephen Rose
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-04-16
View more
  42 in total

1.  Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Micah J Sheller; G Anthony Reina; Brandon Edwards; Jason Martin; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2019-01-26

Review 2.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology.

Authors:  Koichiro Yasaka; Hiroyuki Akai; Akira Kunimatsu; Shigeru Kiryu; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Discovering and interpreting transcriptomic drivers of imaging traits using neural networks.

Authors:  Nova F Smedley; Suzie El-Saden; William Hsu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Fully automated hybrid approach to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas via deep learning and radiomics.

Authors:  Yoon Seong Choi; Sohi Bae; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Se Hoon Kim; Jinna Kim; Tyler Hyungtaek Rim; Seung Hong Choi; Rajan Jain; Seung-Koo Lee
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Can artificial intelligence overtake human intelligence on the bumpy road towards glioma therapy?

Authors:  Precilla S Daisy; T S Anitha
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence radiogenomics for advancing precision and effectiveness in oncologic care (Review).

Authors:  Eleftherios Trivizakis; Georgios Z Papadakis; Ioannis Souglakos; Nikolaos Papanikolaou; Lefteris Koumakis; Demetrios A Spandidos; Aristidis Tsatsakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Kostas Marias
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 7.  Emerging MRI Techniques to Redefine Treatment Response in Patients With Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Fabrício Guimarães Gonçalves; Sanjeev Chawla; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Deep Convolutional Radiomic Features on Diffusion Tensor Images for Classification of Glioma Grades.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Jingjing Xiao; Shandong Wu; Fajin Lv; Junwei Gong; Lin Jiang; Renqiang Yu; Tianyou Luo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  A Comparison of the Efficiency of Using a Deep CNN Approach with Other Common Regression Methods for the Prediction of EGFR Expression in Glioblastoma Patients.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hedyehzadeh; Keivan Maghooli; Mohammad MomenGharibvand; Stephen Pistorius
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; R Nick Bryan; Christos Davatzikos; Suyash Mohan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.