Literature DB >> 32699759

Prospective Evaluation of the Time Required for Insertion of 380 Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws Using Navigation with an Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging System.

Benjamin Tze Keong Ding1, Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal1, Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh1, Chun-Sing Yu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the time required for various parts of the procedure to insert lumbar and sacral pedicle screws using navigation with an intraoperative, 3-dimensional imaging system. Comparison of these timings was carried out for different surgical indications.
METHODS: This was a single-surgeon prospective cohort study of 69 consecutive patients (between August 2013 and June 2018) who underwent insertion of 380 pedicle screws into the lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Surgical indications, average time required for surgical exposure and attachment of the reference frame, average time required until completion of the first pedicle screw insertion, and average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw were evaluated.
RESULTS: The average time required from skin incision to reference frame attachment was 28.3 ± 20.4 (mean ± SD) minutes, and the average time required from reference frame attachment to completion of first pedicle screw insertion was 22.3 ± 9.6 minutes. The average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.8 ± 2.7 minutes. When surgical indications were compared, the average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.7 ± 2.6 minutes in surgery for spondylosis-related stenosis, 8.1 ± 2.8 minutes for degenerative scoliosis, and 8.2 ± 3.6 minutes for metastatic tumor (P = .89). There were no significant changes in these timings over consecutive 6-month periods.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant learning curve and no significant difference in navigation setup and pedicle screw insertion timings with intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems for surgeries of different pathologies and levels of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional fluoroscopy; O-arm; degenerative scoliosis; lumbar pedicle screw; lumbar spine; lumbar spondylosis; navigation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32699759      PMCID: PMC7343261          DOI: 10.14444/7048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T Laine; T Lund; M Ylikoski; J Lohikoski; D Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yasuo Ito; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masao Tomioka; Yasuhiro Hasegawa; Kie Nakago; Yukihisa Yagata
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-11

4.  Routine spinal navigation for thoraco-lumbar pedicle screw insertion using the O-arm three-dimensional imaging system improves placement accuracy.

Authors:  Ji Min Ling; Shree Kumar Dinesh; Boon Chuan Pang; Min Wei Chen; Heng Lip Lim; Danny T Louange; Chun Sing Yu; Chee Meng Ernest Wang
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Prospective Comparison Study Between the Fluoroscopy-guided and Navigation Coupled With O-arm-guided Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.

Authors:  Myung-Hoon Shin; Jung-Woo Hur; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-07

6.  Effect of intraoperative navigation on operative time in 1-level lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Arjun R Khanna; Vijay Yanamadala; Jean-Valery Coumans
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yucheng Wang; Kangwu Chen; Hao Chen; Kai Zhang; Jian Lu; Haiqing Mao; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Internal fixation (pedicle screw fixation) for fusions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S R Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Does the Iliac Wing Influence L5 Pedicle Screw Fixation?

Authors:  Hai-Ming Jin; Xue-Qin Bai; Xiang-Xiang Pan; Jianwei Wu; Cong-Cong Wu; Ying-Zhao Yan; Ke Wang; Ai-Ming Wu; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Position and complications of pedicle screw insertion with or without image-navigation techniques in the thoracolumbar spine: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Jinshan Tang; Ziqiang Zhu; Tao Sui; Dechao Kong; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2014-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.