Literature DB >> 23563342

Prospective Comparison Study Between the Fluoroscopy-guided and Navigation Coupled With O-arm-guided Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic and Lumbosacral Spines.

Myung-Hoon Shin1, Jung-Woo Hur, Kyeong-Sik Ryu, Chun-Kun Park.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized comparison study between the fluoroscopy-guided and navigation coupled with O-arm-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbosacral spines.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and clinical benefits of a navigation coupled with O-arm-guided method in the thoracic and lumbar spines by comparing with a C-arm fluoroscopy-guided method.
METHODS: Under fluoroscopy guidance, 138 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients, and 124 pedicle screws were inserted from T9 to S1 in 20 patients using the navigation. The position of the screws within the pedicle was assessed from grade 0 (no violation cortex) to grade 3 (>4 mm violation), and the location of the violated cortex was determined. Preparation time of each equipment setting, time for screwing, and the number of x-ray shots were evaluated.
RESULTS: The number of screws observed as grade 0 was 121 (87.7%) in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 114 (91.9%) in the navigation-guided group. The lateral cortex was most commonly involved in the fluoroscopy-guided group (6 cases, 35.3%), and the medial cortex was most common in the navigation-guided group (4 cases, 40%). The mean time required for preparation for screw placement was 3.7 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 14.2 minutes in the navigation-guided group. Average screwing time was 3.6 minutes in the fluoroscopy-guided group and 4.3 minutes in the navigation-guided group. The mean number of x-ray shots for each screw placement in the fluoroscopy-guided group was 6.5. Postoperatively, 2 patients with misplacement of a screw under fluoroscopy guidance presented ipsilateral leg paresthesia, possibly related to the screw position.
CONCLUSIONS: The present prospective study reveals that the pedicle screw placement guided by the navigation coupled with O-arm system was more accurate and safer than that under fluoroscopy guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 23563342     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31829047a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  26 in total

1.  Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  A Aichmair; M Moser; M R Bauer; E Bachmann; J G Snedeker; M Betz; M Farshad
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Importance of intraoperative navigation in spinal surgery].

Authors:  P H Richter; F Gebhard; M Kraus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Techniques and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Varun Puvanesarajah; Jason A Liauw; Sheng-Fu Lo; Ioan A Lina; Timothy F Witham
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-04-18

Review 4.  Cervical screw placement using rapid prototyping drill templates for navigation: a literature review.

Authors:  Teng Lu; Chao Liu; Jun Dong; Meng Lu; Haopeng Li; Xijing He
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Letter to the editor regarding "O-arm navigation versus C-arm guidance for pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Yanyun Gu; Chunyan Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  New spinal robotic technologies.

Authors:  Bowen Jiang; Tej D Azad; Ethan Cottrill; Corinna C Zygourakis; Alex M Zhu; Neil Crawford; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.592

7.  Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yucheng Wang; Kangwu Chen; Hao Chen; Kai Zhang; Jian Lu; Haiqing Mao; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Combining pedicle screw stimulation with spinal navigation, a protocol to maximize the safety of neural elements and minimize radiation exposure in thoracolumbar spine instrumentation.

Authors:  Sebouh Z Kassis; Loay K Abukwedar; Abdul Karim Msaddi; Catalin N Majer; Walid Othman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Michael Betz; Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Manuel Moser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A comparative study on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement assisted by personalized rapid prototyping template between pre- and post-operation in patients with relatively normal mid-upper thoracic spine.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Zhen-Shan Yuan; William Ryan Spiker; Wei-Xin Dong; Xiao-Yang Sun; Jian-Bing Yuan; Jiao Zhang; Bingke Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.