| Literature DB >> 32679901 |
Kamil Pajor1, Łukasz Pajchel1, Anna Zgadzaj2, Urszula Piotrowska3, Joanna Kolmas1.
Abstract
Hydroxyapatite (HA) powders enriched with silver or gallium ions or both were synthesized by two different routes: standard precipitation and the solid-state method. The powders were characterized by using several methods: inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), powder X-ray diffractometry (PXRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (ssNMR). The effects of enrichment of the HAs in Ag+ or Ga3+ or both on in vitro cytotoxicity and microbiological activity were discussed. PXRD experiments showed that the samples obtained by the wet method consisted of single-phase nanocrystalline HA, while the samples prepared via the solid-state method are microcrystalline with a small amount of calcium oxide. The introduction of higher amounts of silver ions was found to be more effective than enriching HA with small amounts of Ag+. Gallium and silver ions were found not to affect the lattice parameters. Ga3+ affected the crystallinity of the samples as well as the content of structural hydroxyl groups. Among samples synthesized by the wet method, only one (5Ag-HAw) was cytotoxic, whereas all Ga-containing samples obtained by the dry method showed cytotoxicity. In the preliminary antimicrobial test all the materials containing "foreign" ions showed high antibacterial activity.Entities:
Keywords: FT-IR spectroscopy; NMR; PXRD; antibacterial activity; gallium; hydroxyapatite; silver
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32679901 PMCID: PMC7404191 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21145006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the samples: HAw (A); 1Ag-HAw (B); 5Ag-HAw (C); 5Ga-HAw (D); 1Ag5Ga-HAw (E) and 5Ag5Ga-HAw (F).
Quantitative analysis of silver and gallium and calculated molar [Ca+Ag+Ga]/P ratio from inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) data.
| Ag Content
| Efficiency (%) | Ga Content | Efficiency (%) |
[Ca+(Ag)+(Ga)]/P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAw | - | - | - | - | 1.65 ± 0.03 |
| 1Ag-HAw | 0.0056 (0.060) | 56 | - | - | 1.67 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ag-HAw | 0.0460 (0.460) | 92 | - | - | 1.63 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ga-HAw | - | - | 0.047 (0.33) | 94 | 1.59 ± 0.03 |
| 1Ag5Ga5-HAw | 0.0037 (0.04) | 37 | 0.046 (0.32) | 92 | 1.64 ± 0.04 |
| 5Ag5Ga-HAw | 0.0150 (0.16) | 30 | 0.046 (0.32) | 92 | 1.66 ± 0.02 |
| HAd | - | - | - | - | 1.70 ± 0.02 |
| 1Ag-HAd | 0.00093 (0.01) | 9.3 | - | - | 1.85 ± 0.02 |
| 5Ag-HAd | 0.0360 (0.39) | 72 | - | - | 1.83 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ga-HAd | - | - | 0.047 (0.33) | 94 | 1.88 ± 0.04 |
| 1Ag5Ga-HAd | 0.00093 (0.01) | 9.3 | 0.044 (0.31) | 88 | 1.87 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ag5Ga-HAd | 0.031 (0.33) | 62 | 0.044 (0.31) | 99 | 1.78 ± 0.03 |
Figure 2Powder X-ray diffractograms (PXRD) of the samples synthesized by the wet (A) and dry (B) method.
Various parameters obtained from PXRD data (* Error ± 0.3%).
| Lattice Parameters (Å) * | Crystal Size (nm) | Crystallinity Degree | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (002) | (300) | ||||
| HAw | 9.4113 | 6.8700 | 36 ± 2 | 14 ± 2 | 0.54 ± 0.03 |
| 1Ag-HAw | 9.4309 | 6.8784 | 34 ± 3 | 10 ± 3 | 0.44 ± 0.05 |
| 5Ag-HAw | 9.4271 | 6.8783 | 30 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 0.46 ± 0.04 |
| 5Ga-HAw | 9.4222 | 6.8765 | 26 ± 2 | 7 ± 2 | 0.33 ± 0.04 |
| 1Ag5Ga5-HAw | 9.4222 | 6.8765 | 29 ± 2 | 8 ± 2 | 0.40 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ag5Ga-HAw | 9.4152 | 6.8782 | 24 ± 2 | 8 ± 3 | 0.37 ± 0.02 |
| HAd | 9.4112 | 6.8754 | - | - | 0.98 ± 0.02 |
| 1Ag-HAd | 9.4113 | 6.8754 | - | - | 0.97 ± 0.03 |
| 5Ag-HAd | 9.4203 | 6.8809 | - | - | 0.95 ± 0.04 |
| 5Ga-HAd | 9.3991 | 6.8677 | - | - | 0.90 ± 0.02 |
| 1Ag5Ga-HAd | 9.4146 | 6.8777 | - | - | 0.94 ± 0.02 |
| 5Ag5Ga-HAd | 9.4152 | 6.8782 | - | - | 0.92 ± 0.03 |
Figure 3FT-IR spectra of the samples synthesized by the wet (A) and dry (B) method.
Figure 431P cross-polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (31P CP MAS NMR) spectra of the samples synthesized by the wet (A) and dry (B) method.
Figure 51H→31P cross-polarization nuclear magnetic resonance (1H→31P CP NMR) kinetic curves of the representative samples.
1H→31P CP/MAS NMR kinetics parameters for the selected samples.
| HAw | 5Ag-HAw | 5Ga-HAw | 5Ag5Ga-HAw | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 15.1 ± 0.1 | 21.1 ± 0.4 | 20.3 ± 0.2 | 19.2 ± 0.5 |
|
| 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | |
| 1.64 ± 0.04 | 8.8 ± 0.7 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | 18 ± 2 | ||
| ∞ | ∞ | 71 ± 4 | ∞ | ||
| 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ±0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.01 |
Cytotoxicity of the obtained samples (C—cytotoxic; N—non cytotoxic).
| Wet Method | Cytotoxicity | Dry Method | Cytotoxicity |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAw | N | HAd | N |
| 1Ag-HAw | N | 1Ag-HAd | N |
| 5Ag-HAw | C 1 | 5Ag-HAd | N |
| 5Ga-HAw | N | 5Ga-HAd | C 2 |
| 1Ag5Ga5-HAw | N | 1Ag5Ga-HAd | C 3 |
| 5Ag5Ga-HAw | N | 5Ag5Ga-HAd | C 4 |
1 IC50 = 60 mg/mL; 2 IC50 < 12.5 mg/mL; 3 IC50 = 19 mg/mL; 4 IC50 = 20 mg/mL.
Figure 6Disc diffusion antibacterial test against Pseudomonas fluorescens (1Ag5Ga-HAw (A); 5Ag5Ga-HAw (B); 1Ag5GaHAd (C) and 5Ag5Ga-HAd (D).