| Literature DB >> 30355975 |
Teddy Tite1, Adrian-Claudiu Popa2,3, Liliana Marinela Balescu4, Iuliana Maria Bogdan5, Iuliana Pasuk6, José M F Ferreira7, George E Stan8.
Abstract
High-performance bioceramics are required for preventing failure and prolonging the life-time of bone grafting scaffolds and osseous implants. The proper identification and development of materials with extended functionalities addressing socio-economic needs and health problems constitute important and critical steps at the heart of clinical research. Recent findings in the realm of ion-substituted hydroxyapatite (HA) could pave the road towards significant developments in biomedicine, with an emphasis on a new generation of orthopaedic and dentistry applications, since such bioceramics are able to mimic the structural, compositional and mechanical properties of the bone mineral phase. In fact, the fascinating ability of the HA crystalline lattice to allow for the substitution of calcium ions with a plethora of cationic species has been widely explored in the recent period, with consequent modifications of its physical and chemical features, as well as its functional mechanical and in vitro and in vivo biological performance. A comprehensive inventory of the progresses achieved so far is both opportune and of paramount importance, in order to not only gather and summarize information, but to also allow fellow researchers to compare with ease and filter the best solutions for the cation substitution of HA-based materials and enable the development of multi-functional biomedical designs. The review surveys preparation and synthesis methods, pinpoints all the explored cation dopants, and discloses the full application range of substituted HA. Special attention is dedicated to the antimicrobial efficiency spectrum and cytotoxic trade-off concentration values for various cell lines, highlighting new prophylactic routes for the prevention of implant failure. Importantly, the current in vitro biological tests (widely employed to unveil the biological performance of HA-based materials), and their ability to mimic the in vivo biological interactions, are also critically assessed. Future perspectives are discussed, and a series of recommendations are underlined.Entities:
Keywords: biological assays; biomedicine; cation substitution; co-doping; hydroxyapatite
Year: 2018 PMID: 30355975 PMCID: PMC6266948 DOI: 10.3390/ma11112081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Yearly distribution of scientific articles published on the hydroxyapatite topic over the 1975–2018 period (15th of August 2018). Database: Clarivate Analytics—Web of Science® Core Collection. Coupled «title» and «topic» search keywords: “hydroxyapatite”, “hydroxylapatite”, “HA”, “HAp”, “Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, and “Ca5(PO4)3(OH)”.
Figure 2Yearly distribution of scientific articles published on the doped-substituted hydroxyapatite topic over the 1975–2018 period (15th of August 2018). Database: Clarivate Analytics—Web of Science® Core Collection. Coupled «title» and «topic» search keywords: “hydroxyapatite”, “hydroxylapatite”, “HA”, “HAp”, “Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2”, “Ca5(PO4)3(OH)”, “doped”, and “substituted”. Inset: Frequency of cation doping in hydroxyapatite.
Preparation of hydroxyapatite (HA) from natural resources.
| Elements | Source | Synthesis Method | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bovine | Cortical bone | [ | |
| Cortical bone | [ | ||
| Teeth | [ | ||
| Pig | Cortical bone | [ | |
| Cortical bone | [ | ||
| Camel | Cortical bone | [ | |
| Sheep | Cortical bone | [ | |
| Dentine | [ | ||
| Chicken | Egg-shells | [ | |
| Fish | Bones | [ | |
| Mussel | Shells | [ | |
| Snail | Shells | [ | |
| Cuttlefish | Whole | [ | |
| Dolomic marble | Origin: Ruschiţa, Romania | [ | |
| Red algae | Whole | [ |
Figure 3Yearly distribution of scientific articles published on the hydroxyapatite coatings topic over the 1975–2018 period (15th of August 2018). Database: Clarivate Analytics—Web of Science® Core Collection. Coupled «title» and «topic» search keywords: “hydroxyapatite”, “hydroxylapatite”, “HA”, “HAp”, “Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2”, “Ca5(PO4)3(OH)”, “coating”, “film”, and “layer”. Inset: Frequency comparison of the most used technologies for coating fabrication.
Other fields of applications for cation-substituted hydroxyapatite.
| Cation Dopant | Field of Application [Refs.] |
|---|---|
| Na | Sensors [ |
| Sr | Catalysis [ |
| Ba | Water decontamination [ |
| Al | Environment decontamination [ |
| Sn | Radionuclides and heavy metals scavengers (decontamination) [ |
| Pb | Catalysis [ |
| Y | Electrochemical devices [ |
| Ti | Catalysis [ |
| V | Catalysis [ |
| Mn | Catalysis [ |
| Fe | Sensors [ |
| Co | Sensors [ |
| Ni | Catalysis [ |
| Pd | Catalysis [ |
| Pt | Catalysis [ |
| Cu | Catalysis [ |
| Ag | Catalysis [ |
| Au | Catalysis [ |
| Zn | Catalysis [ |
| Sm | Optoelectronics [ |
| Eu | Optoelectronics [ |
| Gd | Optoelectronics [ |
| Tb | Catalysis [ |
| Dy | Optoelectronics [ |
Synopsis of the bio-functionality realm of cation-substituted hydroxyapatites.
| Cation (M) | Sample Form | Doping Range [M/(M + Ca)]∙100 (at.%) | Bio-Functionality/Effect of the Dopant | Refs. |
| Powder Scaffold Coating | 0.5–2 |
Stimulates in vitro bone-like apatite growth in simulated body fluid (SBF); Increases cell viability and proliferation; Li-HA scaffolds revealed in vivo (Japanese white rabbits) good Improves the Induces the | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 5 |
Enhances the in vitro biomineralization of apatite in SBF; Promotes Increases | [ | |
| Powder | 2.5–47 |
The Constitutes a | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 1–53 |
Mg doping stimulates bone-like apatite growth in SBF; Improves the Mg | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 1–40 |
Improves the biomineralization capacity (both in SBF and modified Eagle’s medium (MEM) media); Enhances the osteoblast cells Inhibits osteoclast production and proliferation (reducing bone resorption); | [ | |
| Powder | 0.5–2 |
Increases the biomineralization capacity of CaPs in SBF. No information on in vitro or in vivo biocompatibility; | [ | |
| Powder | 0.5–2.5 |
| [ | |
| Powder | n/a |
Non-effective against | [ | |
| Powder | 1; 3 |
Improves the Induces | [ | |
| Powder | 5–25 |
Increases HA dissolution rate; Induces the in vitro formation of bone-like apatite in SBF; Improves Bi-HA (scaffolds)—polyurethane (matrix) elicit excellent | [ | |
| Powder | 0.04–0.22 |
| [ | |
| Powder Scaffold Coating | 0.5–5 |
Induces the in vitro biomineralization of biomimetic apatite layers in both SBF and McCoy media; In vivo evaluations on Sprague-Dawley rats showed efficiency against methicillin-resistant Not effective as antibiotic against: Ag+ does not affect the densification of HA; At low concentrations it decreases HA solubility; Hardness is affected by Ag doping. | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 0.1–50 |
Excellent in vitro bioactivity in SBF; No inflammatory effect; | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 0.04–5 |
Excellent in vitro bioactivity in SBF. Beneficial for inducing A doping concentration of A significant level of | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 0.4–20 |
Possesses the ability to induce the in vitro growth on biomimetic apatite in SBF; Stimulates cell Increases Enhances the | [ | |
| Powder | 1–50 |
Increases Fe3+ is involved in Induces Fe-HA has | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 1–13 |
Induces in vitro formation of biomimetic apatite in SBF; Enhances cell proliferation, differentiation in osteoblasts and matrix mineralization; Hardness and elastic modulus increases with Ti addition. | [ | |
| Powder | 0.5–2.5 |
Cr- | [ | |
| Powder | 0.2–27 |
Elicits Might induce Ineffective against | [ | |
| Powder | 0.13–0.27 |
Promotes | [ | |
| Powder | 0.8–8.3 (theoretical)0.2–2.4(determined by ICP-OES) |
| [ | |
| Powder | 0.05–5.2 |
Enhances HA’s ability to | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 1.3–7 |
Stimulates Can be used for radioactive synovectomy to | [ | |
| Powder | n/a |
Toxic effect on the growth of plants. | [ | |
| Powder | 0.7–32.3 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 0.5–15 |
In vivo (mice) tests show | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 2–30 |
Improvement of mechanical properties: bonding strength and Vickers hardness. | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 4–20 |
Induces the in vitro formation of bone-like apatite in SBF; | [ | |
| Powder | 0.1–0.5 |
Increase of MG-63 Significant decrease of bacteria number when coupled with Fe3O4 NPs. | [ | |
| Powder Coating | 0.2–0.5 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 0.1–20 |
Induces the in vitro formation of bone-like apatite in SBF; | [ | |
| Powder | 2–17 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 1–17 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 0.5–10 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 1–17 |
| [ | |
| Powder | 2–10 |
Induces the formation of biomimetic apatite in-growths in SBF. | [ | |
| Solution | 0.1–10 |
| [ |
Figure 4Half-maximal cytotoxic concentration (in mM) of various cationic species: Li [428,429,430], Na [431,432,433,434], Mg [435,436,437,438], Sr [439,440,441], Al [442,443,444], Ga [408,445], Sn [406,446,447], Te [448,449,450], Pb [427,451], Bi [452,453,454,455], Ti [406,408,443,444,456,457], V [408,442,443,444], Cr [408,442,443,444], Mn [443,458,459,460], Fe [426,442,443,461], Co [406,408,442,443,444,462,463], Ni [406,408,430,443,444,445,462,463,464,465], Cu [406,408,445,462,466], Zn [406,408,457,462,467], Y [468,469,470], Zr [406,442], Mo [442,443,471,472], Ag [406,408,445,471,473,474,475,476], Cd [408,462,471], La [477,478,479], Ce [406,480,481,482], Pr [480,483], Nd [480,484], Sm [480,485], Eu [477,480], Gd [480,486,487], Tb [488], Dy [485], Ho [480,485,489], Er [480,483,485], U [490,491].