Literature DB >> 32654644

The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Robin M Tinghitella1, Alycia C R Lackey2, Catherine Durso3, Jennifer A H Koop4, Janette W Boughman5.   

Abstract

Preference divergence is thought to contribute to reproductive isolation. Ecology can alter the way selection acts on female preferences, making them most likely to diverge when ecological conditions vary among populations. We present a novel mechanism for ecologically dependent sexual selection, termed 'the ecological stage' to highlight its ecological dependence. Our hypothesized mechanism emphasizes that males and females interact over mating in a specific ecological context, and different ecological conditions change the costs and benefits of mating interactions, selecting for different preferences in distinct environments and different male traits, especially when traits are condition dependent. We test key predictions of this mechanism in a sympatric three-spine stickleback species pair. We used a maternal half-sib split-clutch design for both species, mating females to attractive and unattractive males and raising progeny on alternate diets that mimic the specialized diets of the species in nature. We estimated the benefits of mate choice for an indicator trait (male nuptial colour) by measuring many fitness components across the lifetimes of both sons and daughters from these crosses. We analysed fitness data using a combination of aster and mixed models. We found that many benefits of mating with high-colour males depended on both species and diet. These results support the ecological stage hypothesis for sticklebacks. Finally, we discuss the potential role of this mechanism for other taxa and highlight its ability to enhance reproductive isolation as speciation proceeds, thus facilitating the evolution of strong reproductive isolation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aster modelling; mate choice; preference divergence; reproductive isolation; selection; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32654644      PMCID: PMC7423281          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  55 in total

1.  Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction.

Authors:  F Y Jia; M D Greenfield; R D Collins
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent.

Authors:  Allison M Welch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evidence for ecology's role in speciation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Seiichi Mori; Benjamin K Blackman; Lior David; David M Kingsley; Leia Jamieson; Jennifer Chou; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Virginie Ravigné
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Fission and fusion of Darwin's finches populations.

Authors:  B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies.

Authors:  Richard M Merrill; Zachariah Gompert; Lauren M Dembeck; Marcus R Kronforst; W Owen McMillan; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  BODY SIZE, NATURAL SELECTION, AND SPECIATION IN STICKLEBACKS.

Authors:  Laura Nagel; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections.

Authors:  I Barber; S A Arnott; V A Braithwaite; J Andrew; F A Huntingford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review.

Authors:  Franz J Weissing; Pim Edelaar; G Sander van Doorn
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

1.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Towards the completion of speciation: the evolution of reproductive isolation beyond the first barriers.

Authors:  Jonna Kulmuni; Roger K Butlin; Kay Lucek; Vincent Savolainen; Anja Marie Westram
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.