Literature DB >> 12778557

Genetic benefits of a female mating preference in gray tree frogs are context-dependent.

Allison M Welch1.   

Abstract

"Good genes" models of sexual selection predict that male courtship displays can advertise genetic quality and that, by mating with males with extreme displays, females can obtain genetic benefits for their offspring. However, because the relative performance of different genotypes can vary across environments, these genetic benefits may depend on the environmental context; in which case, static mating preferences may not be adaptive. To better understand how selection acts on the preference that female gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) express for long advertisement calls, I tested for genetic benefits in two realistic natural environments, by comparing the performance of half-sibling offspring sired by males with long versus short calls. Tadpoles from twelve such maternal half-sibships were raised in enclosures in their natal pond at two densities. In the low-density treatment, offspring of long-call males were larger at metamorphosis than were offspring of short-call males, whereas in the high-density treatment, offspring of males with long calls tended to metamorphose later than offspring of males with short calls. Thus, although the genes indicated by long calls were advantageous under low-density conditions, they were not beneficial under all conditions, suggesting that a static preference for long calls may not be adaptive in all environments. Such a genotype-by-environment interaction in the genetic consequences of mate choice predicts that when the environment is variable, selection may favor plasticity in female preferences or female selectivity among environments to control the conditions experienced by the offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12778557     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00299.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  17 in total

1.  Socially flexible female choice differs among populations of the Pacific field cricket: geographical variation in the interaction coefficient psi (Ψ).

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Daniel J Rankin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 4.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  'Good-genes' and 'compatible-genes' effects in an Alpine whitefish and the information content of breeding tubercles over the course of the spawning season.

Authors:  Claus Wedekind; Guillaume Evanno; Davnah Urbach; Alain Jacob; Rudolf Müller
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Swingin' in the rain: condition dependence and sexual selection in a capricious world.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn; Helen L Osmond; Michael C Double
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Indirect genetic effects and the lek paradox: inter-genotypic competition may strengthen genotype x environment interactions and conserve genetic variance.

Authors:  Anne M Danielson-François; Yihong Zhou; Michael D Greenfield
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  An introduction to genetic quality in the context of sexual selection.

Authors:  Trevor E Pitcher; Herman L Mays
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  The ecological stage changes benefits of mate choice and drives preference divergence.

Authors:  Robin M Tinghitella; Alycia C R Lackey; Catherine Durso; Jennifer A H Koop; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.